机器学习心电图模型鉴别takotsubo综合征与心肌梗死。

IF 4.4 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
European heart journal. Digital health Pub Date : 2025-06-23 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf073
Felicia H K Hakansson, Erik Bodin, Vincent Dutordoir, Axel Gemvik, Thomas Olsson, Isabelle Nilsson, Mikael Andersson Franko, Jonas Spaak, Christina Ekenbäck, Loghman Henareh, Carl Henrik Ek, Per Tornvall
{"title":"机器学习心电图模型鉴别takotsubo综合征与心肌梗死。","authors":"Felicia H K Hakansson, Erik Bodin, Vincent Dutordoir, Axel Gemvik, Thomas Olsson, Isabelle Nilsson, Mikael Andersson Franko, Jonas Spaak, Christina Ekenbäck, Loghman Henareh, Carl Henrik Ek, Per Tornvall","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Machine learning (ML) algorithms applied to the electrocardiography (ECG) have been successful in several cardiac diagnoses, however, rarely been used for the diagnostics of takotsubo syndrome (TTS). Our aim was to develop ML-based ECG-models to differentiate TTS from patients with myocardial infarction (MI).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Cross-sectional study in Stockholm. A neural network with UNet architecture was trained and validated on 507 TTS cases and 14 978 controls with suspected and verified MI, identified from the Swedish coronary angiography and angioplasty register. Cross-validation was performed. The models were compared with cardiologists using previously proposed ECG criteria. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) for discriminating TTS from patients with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation MI ROC AUC 0.88 (cross-validation: 0.85-0.92) and 0.86 (cross-validation: 0.82-0.91), respectively. ROC AUC for discriminating TTS from verified MI [non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI) and ST-elevation MI (STEMI)] was 0.87 (cross-validation: 0.83-0.91) with sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.83) with low positive predictive value (PPV) and high negative predictive value (NPV). Results for suspected MI was ROC AUC 0.85 (cross validation: 0.81-0.91) with sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.79) with low PPV (0.11) and high NPV (0.99). The committee of two cardiologists using a combination of ECG criteria achieved an ROC AUC of 0.71.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning models could discriminate TTS from MI (NSTEMI and STEMI) and suspected MI with high sensitivity and NPV, outperforming cardiologists using conventional criteria. The models require further refinement to increase PPV, precision-recall and external validation, but it holds promise for TTS screening aiding the clinician in ruling out TTS.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 5","pages":"929-938"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450510/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning electrocardiography model to differentiate takotsubo syndrome from myocardial infarction.\",\"authors\":\"Felicia H K Hakansson, Erik Bodin, Vincent Dutordoir, Axel Gemvik, Thomas Olsson, Isabelle Nilsson, Mikael Andersson Franko, Jonas Spaak, Christina Ekenbäck, Loghman Henareh, Carl Henrik Ek, Per Tornvall\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Machine learning (ML) algorithms applied to the electrocardiography (ECG) have been successful in several cardiac diagnoses, however, rarely been used for the diagnostics of takotsubo syndrome (TTS). Our aim was to develop ML-based ECG-models to differentiate TTS from patients with myocardial infarction (MI).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Cross-sectional study in Stockholm. A neural network with UNet architecture was trained and validated on 507 TTS cases and 14 978 controls with suspected and verified MI, identified from the Swedish coronary angiography and angioplasty register. Cross-validation was performed. The models were compared with cardiologists using previously proposed ECG criteria. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) for discriminating TTS from patients with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation MI ROC AUC 0.88 (cross-validation: 0.85-0.92) and 0.86 (cross-validation: 0.82-0.91), respectively. ROC AUC for discriminating TTS from verified MI [non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI) and ST-elevation MI (STEMI)] was 0.87 (cross-validation: 0.83-0.91) with sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.83) with low positive predictive value (PPV) and high negative predictive value (NPV). Results for suspected MI was ROC AUC 0.85 (cross validation: 0.81-0.91) with sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.79) with low PPV (0.11) and high NPV (0.99). The committee of two cardiologists using a combination of ECG criteria achieved an ROC AUC of 0.71.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning models could discriminate TTS from MI (NSTEMI and STEMI) and suspected MI with high sensitivity and NPV, outperforming cardiologists using conventional criteria. The models require further refinement to increase PPV, precision-recall and external validation, but it holds promise for TTS screening aiding the clinician in ruling out TTS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European heart journal. Digital health\",\"volume\":\"6 5\",\"pages\":\"929-938\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450510/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European heart journal. Digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:应用于心电图(ECG)的机器学习(ML)算法在几种心脏诊断中取得了成功,然而,很少用于takotsubo综合征(TTS)的诊断。我们的目的是建立基于ml的心电图模型来区分TTS和心肌梗死(MI)患者。方法和结果:在斯德哥尔摩进行横断面研究。采用UNet结构的神经网络对507例TTS病例和14978例疑似和确诊心肌梗死的对照进行了训练和验证,这些患者来自瑞典冠状动脉造影和血管成形术登记。进行交叉验证。这些模型与心脏病专家使用先前提出的ECG标准进行比较。区分TTS与st段抬高和非st段抬高MI患者的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.88(交叉验证:0.85-0.92)和0.86(交叉验证:0.82-0.91)。区分TTS与已证实的心肌梗死[非st段抬高心肌梗死(NSTEMI)和st段抬高心肌梗死(STEMI)]的ROC AUC为0.87(交叉验证:0.83-0.91),敏感性(0.75)和特异性(0.83)具有低阳性预测值(PPV)和高阴性预测值(NPV)。结果疑似心肌梗死的ROC AUC为0.85(交叉验证:0.81-0.91),敏感性(0.75)和特异性(0.79),低PPV(0.11)和高NPV(0.99)。由两名心脏病专家组成的委员会使用ECG标准组合获得了0.71的ROC AUC。结论:机器学习模型能够以高灵敏度和NPV区分TTS与心肌梗死(NSTEMI和STEMI)和疑似心肌梗死,优于使用传统标准的心脏病专家。该模型需要进一步改进以提高PPV、精确召回率和外部验证,但它有望用于TTS筛查,帮助临床医生排除TTS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine learning electrocardiography model to differentiate takotsubo syndrome from myocardial infarction.

Aims: Machine learning (ML) algorithms applied to the electrocardiography (ECG) have been successful in several cardiac diagnoses, however, rarely been used for the diagnostics of takotsubo syndrome (TTS). Our aim was to develop ML-based ECG-models to differentiate TTS from patients with myocardial infarction (MI).

Methods and results: Cross-sectional study in Stockholm. A neural network with UNet architecture was trained and validated on 507 TTS cases and 14 978 controls with suspected and verified MI, identified from the Swedish coronary angiography and angioplasty register. Cross-validation was performed. The models were compared with cardiologists using previously proposed ECG criteria. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) for discriminating TTS from patients with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation MI ROC AUC 0.88 (cross-validation: 0.85-0.92) and 0.86 (cross-validation: 0.82-0.91), respectively. ROC AUC for discriminating TTS from verified MI [non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI) and ST-elevation MI (STEMI)] was 0.87 (cross-validation: 0.83-0.91) with sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.83) with low positive predictive value (PPV) and high negative predictive value (NPV). Results for suspected MI was ROC AUC 0.85 (cross validation: 0.81-0.91) with sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.79) with low PPV (0.11) and high NPV (0.99). The committee of two cardiologists using a combination of ECG criteria achieved an ROC AUC of 0.71.

Conclusion: Machine learning models could discriminate TTS from MI (NSTEMI and STEMI) and suspected MI with high sensitivity and NPV, outperforming cardiologists using conventional criteria. The models require further refinement to increase PPV, precision-recall and external validation, but it holds promise for TTS screening aiding the clinician in ruling out TTS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信