Tanmay A Gokhale, Nathan T Riek, Brent Medoff, Rui Qi Ji, Belinda Rivera-Lebron, Ervin Sejdic, Murat Akcakaya, Samir F Saba, Salah Al-Zaiti, Catalin Toma
{"title":"人工智能驱动的肺动脉栓塞风险分层心电图分析。","authors":"Tanmay A Gokhale, Nathan T Riek, Brent Medoff, Rui Qi Ji, Belinda Rivera-Lebron, Ervin Sejdic, Murat Akcakaya, Samir F Saba, Salah Al-Zaiti, Catalin Toma","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Among patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), rapid identification of those with highest clinical risk can help guide life-saving treatment. However, current risk stratification algorithms involve a multistep process requiring physical exam, imaging, and laboratory results. We investigated the utility of electrocardiogram (ECG) alone to rapidly identify patients at elevated clinical risk by developing and validating a feature-based artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict clinical risk.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients who were diagnosed with PE over a 9-year period, had an ECG within 1 day of presentation, and were evaluated by our PE response team (PERT) were included. A feature-based random forest model was trained to predict the PERT team's risk stratification from the ECG alone. The ability of the model to predict the clinical risk categorization and the accuracy of both risk stratification approaches in predicting mortality were examined on a holdout test set. Of the overall cohort of 1376 patients, 55% had a submassive (intermediate risk) or massive (high risk) PE, which were grouped together as 'severe PE'. The AI-ECG model was able to predict the clinical classification (low-risk vs. severe PE) with an AUC of 0.83 and F1 score of 0.78 in a holdout test set. A 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality were significantly different between patients classified by the model as low vs. elevated risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI-based analysis of 12-lead ECGs may provide a useful tool in the risk stratification of PE, allowing for rapid identification and treatment of those at highest risk of adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 5","pages":"989-996"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence-driven electrocardiogram analysis for risk stratification in pulmonary embolism.\",\"authors\":\"Tanmay A Gokhale, Nathan T Riek, Brent Medoff, Rui Qi Ji, Belinda Rivera-Lebron, Ervin Sejdic, Murat Akcakaya, Samir F Saba, Salah Al-Zaiti, Catalin Toma\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Among patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), rapid identification of those with highest clinical risk can help guide life-saving treatment. However, current risk stratification algorithms involve a multistep process requiring physical exam, imaging, and laboratory results. We investigated the utility of electrocardiogram (ECG) alone to rapidly identify patients at elevated clinical risk by developing and validating a feature-based artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict clinical risk.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients who were diagnosed with PE over a 9-year period, had an ECG within 1 day of presentation, and were evaluated by our PE response team (PERT) were included. A feature-based random forest model was trained to predict the PERT team's risk stratification from the ECG alone. The ability of the model to predict the clinical risk categorization and the accuracy of both risk stratification approaches in predicting mortality were examined on a holdout test set. Of the overall cohort of 1376 patients, 55% had a submassive (intermediate risk) or massive (high risk) PE, which were grouped together as 'severe PE'. The AI-ECG model was able to predict the clinical classification (low-risk vs. severe PE) with an AUC of 0.83 and F1 score of 0.78 in a holdout test set. A 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality were significantly different between patients classified by the model as low vs. elevated risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI-based analysis of 12-lead ECGs may provide a useful tool in the risk stratification of PE, allowing for rapid identification and treatment of those at highest risk of adverse outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European heart journal. Digital health\",\"volume\":\"6 5\",\"pages\":\"989-996\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450519/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European heart journal. Digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artificial intelligence-driven electrocardiogram analysis for risk stratification in pulmonary embolism.
Aims: Among patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), rapid identification of those with highest clinical risk can help guide life-saving treatment. However, current risk stratification algorithms involve a multistep process requiring physical exam, imaging, and laboratory results. We investigated the utility of electrocardiogram (ECG) alone to rapidly identify patients at elevated clinical risk by developing and validating a feature-based artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict clinical risk.
Methods and results: Patients who were diagnosed with PE over a 9-year period, had an ECG within 1 day of presentation, and were evaluated by our PE response team (PERT) were included. A feature-based random forest model was trained to predict the PERT team's risk stratification from the ECG alone. The ability of the model to predict the clinical risk categorization and the accuracy of both risk stratification approaches in predicting mortality were examined on a holdout test set. Of the overall cohort of 1376 patients, 55% had a submassive (intermediate risk) or massive (high risk) PE, which were grouped together as 'severe PE'. The AI-ECG model was able to predict the clinical classification (low-risk vs. severe PE) with an AUC of 0.83 and F1 score of 0.78 in a holdout test set. A 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality were significantly different between patients classified by the model as low vs. elevated risk.
Conclusion: AI-based analysis of 12-lead ECGs may provide a useful tool in the risk stratification of PE, allowing for rapid identification and treatment of those at highest risk of adverse outcomes.