Sun Hyong Kim, Inhwan Kim, Jin-Hyoung Cho, Kyung-Hwa Kang, Minji Kim, Su-Jung Kim, Yoon-Ji Kim, Sang-Jin Sung, Young Ho Kim, Sung-Hoon Lim, Seung-Hak Baek, Namkug Kim, Mihee Hong
{"title":"人工智能辅助下III类双颌手术患者连续侧位脑电图软组织地标识别的准确性。","authors":"Sun Hyong Kim, Inhwan Kim, Jin-Hyoung Cho, Kyung-Hwa Kang, Minji Kim, Su-Jung Kim, Yoon-Ji Kim, Sang-Jin Sung, Young Ho Kim, Sung-Hoon Lim, Seung-Hak Baek, Namkug Kim, Mihee Hong","doi":"10.4041/kjod24.302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted soft tissue landmark identification (STLI) on serial lateral cephalograms (Lat-Cephs) of Class III patients treated with two-jaw orthognathic surgery across four different time-points.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convolutional neural network model was developed for STLI, trained and validated using 3,004 Lat-Cephs from 751 patients. The test set included 224 Lat-Cephs from 56 patients, divided into the genioplasty (n = 22) and non-genioplasty (n = 34) groups. The four time-points included initial (T0), pre-surgery (T1, brackets), post-surgery (T2, brackets, surgical plates, and screws [S-PS]), and debonding (T3, S-PS and fixed retainers). AI accuracy was compared with a human standard for 13 soft tissue landmarks. Mean radial errors (MREs), horizontal and vertical errors, and statistical differences were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total MRE across all time-points was 1.50 ± 0.48 mm, with 64.9% of values being less than 1.5 mm MRE. There were no significant differences in accuracy among the four time-points (T0, 1.41 mm; T1, 1.53 mm; T2, 1.58 mm; T3, 1.47 mm). The pronasale, stomion inferius (Stmi), stomion superius (Stms) showed an increase in MRE (<i>P</i> < 0.01, <i>P</i> < 0.05, and <i>P</i> < 0.05, respectively), whereas the Lower Lip showed a decrease in MRE (<i>P</i> < 0.01). There were no significant differences in errors across time-points for the soft-tissue B point, soft-tissue Pogonion, or soft-tissue Menton between the genioplasty and non-genioplasty groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AI algorithm in this study might be an effective tool for STLI in Lat-Cephs at T1, T2, and T3, despite the presence of brackets, S-PS, fixed retainers, genioplasty, and bone remodeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":51260,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"55 5","pages":"392-404"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460026/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted soft tissue landmark identification in serial lateral cephalograms of Class III two-jaw surgery patients.\",\"authors\":\"Sun Hyong Kim, Inhwan Kim, Jin-Hyoung Cho, Kyung-Hwa Kang, Minji Kim, Su-Jung Kim, Yoon-Ji Kim, Sang-Jin Sung, Young Ho Kim, Sung-Hoon Lim, Seung-Hak Baek, Namkug Kim, Mihee Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.4041/kjod24.302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted soft tissue landmark identification (STLI) on serial lateral cephalograms (Lat-Cephs) of Class III patients treated with two-jaw orthognathic surgery across four different time-points.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convolutional neural network model was developed for STLI, trained and validated using 3,004 Lat-Cephs from 751 patients. The test set included 224 Lat-Cephs from 56 patients, divided into the genioplasty (n = 22) and non-genioplasty (n = 34) groups. The four time-points included initial (T0), pre-surgery (T1, brackets), post-surgery (T2, brackets, surgical plates, and screws [S-PS]), and debonding (T3, S-PS and fixed retainers). AI accuracy was compared with a human standard for 13 soft tissue landmarks. Mean radial errors (MREs), horizontal and vertical errors, and statistical differences were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total MRE across all time-points was 1.50 ± 0.48 mm, with 64.9% of values being less than 1.5 mm MRE. There were no significant differences in accuracy among the four time-points (T0, 1.41 mm; T1, 1.53 mm; T2, 1.58 mm; T3, 1.47 mm). The pronasale, stomion inferius (Stmi), stomion superius (Stms) showed an increase in MRE (<i>P</i> < 0.01, <i>P</i> < 0.05, and <i>P</i> < 0.05, respectively), whereas the Lower Lip showed a decrease in MRE (<i>P</i> < 0.01). There were no significant differences in errors across time-points for the soft-tissue B point, soft-tissue Pogonion, or soft-tissue Menton between the genioplasty and non-genioplasty groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AI algorithm in this study might be an effective tool for STLI in Lat-Cephs at T1, T2, and T3, despite the presence of brackets, S-PS, fixed retainers, genioplasty, and bone remodeling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"55 5\",\"pages\":\"392-404\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460026/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod24.302\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod24.302","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted soft tissue landmark identification in serial lateral cephalograms of Class III two-jaw surgery patients.
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted soft tissue landmark identification (STLI) on serial lateral cephalograms (Lat-Cephs) of Class III patients treated with two-jaw orthognathic surgery across four different time-points.
Methods: A convolutional neural network model was developed for STLI, trained and validated using 3,004 Lat-Cephs from 751 patients. The test set included 224 Lat-Cephs from 56 patients, divided into the genioplasty (n = 22) and non-genioplasty (n = 34) groups. The four time-points included initial (T0), pre-surgery (T1, brackets), post-surgery (T2, brackets, surgical plates, and screws [S-PS]), and debonding (T3, S-PS and fixed retainers). AI accuracy was compared with a human standard for 13 soft tissue landmarks. Mean radial errors (MREs), horizontal and vertical errors, and statistical differences were analyzed.
Results: The total MRE across all time-points was 1.50 ± 0.48 mm, with 64.9% of values being less than 1.5 mm MRE. There were no significant differences in accuracy among the four time-points (T0, 1.41 mm; T1, 1.53 mm; T2, 1.58 mm; T3, 1.47 mm). The pronasale, stomion inferius (Stmi), stomion superius (Stms) showed an increase in MRE (P < 0.01, P < 0.05, and P < 0.05, respectively), whereas the Lower Lip showed a decrease in MRE (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in errors across time-points for the soft-tissue B point, soft-tissue Pogonion, or soft-tissue Menton between the genioplasty and non-genioplasty groups.
Conclusions: The AI algorithm in this study might be an effective tool for STLI in Lat-Cephs at T1, T2, and T3, despite the presence of brackets, S-PS, fixed retainers, genioplasty, and bone remodeling.
期刊介绍:
The Korean Journal of Orthodontics (KJO) is an international, open access, peer reviewed journal published in January, March, May, July, September, and November each year. It was first launched in 1970 and, as the official scientific publication of Korean Association of Orthodontists, KJO aims to publish high quality clinical and scientific original research papers in all areas related to orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. Specifically, its interest focuses on evidence-based investigations of contemporary diagnostic procedures and treatment techniques, expanding to significant clinical reports of diverse treatment approaches.
The scope of KJO covers all areas of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics including successful diagnostic procedures and treatment planning, growth and development of the face and its clinical implications, appliance designs, biomechanics, TMJ disorders and adult treatment. Specifically, its latest interest focuses on skeletal anchorage devices, orthodontic appliance and biomaterials, 3 dimensional imaging techniques utilized for dentofacial diagnosis and treatment planning, and orthognathic surgery to correct skeletal disharmony in association of orthodontic treatment.