{"title":"弗洛伦提乌斯·舒尔(Florentius Schuyl) 1662年、1664年拉丁文版《笛卡尔人性论》中的脑血管系统插图。","authors":"Douglas J Lanska","doi":"10.1080/0964704X.2025.2557331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The <i>Treatise on Man</i> (1662, 1664) by French philosopher René Descartes (1596-1650) is the primary source for Cartesian physiology, but the accompanying illustrations were created <i>after</i> Descartes' death by a group of Descartes' disciples who were forced to create illustrations for Descartes' unfinished, and often vague and confusing, text. The iconographic tradition originating in the French edition (<i>L'Homme</i>, 1664) has predominated since the 17th century, whereas the Latin editions (<i>De Homine</i>, 1662, 1664) and their illustrations remain little known. Dutch physician and botanist Florentius Schuyl (1619-1669) both edited and illustrated the Latin editions with woodcuts and copperplate engravings. Although Schuyl faithfully illustrated Descartes' mistaken notions concerning the location and motility of the pineal gland, other mistakes and innovations were due to Schuyl rather than Descartes. These include (1) the mistake of illustrating the mythical human rete mirabile more than a century after Jacopo Berengario da Carpi (1460-1530) and Andreas Vesalius (1514-1564) had denied its existence in humans; (2) the mistake of illustrating an ungulate aortic arch as that of a human; and (3) the insight and courage to modify a Vesalian diagram to show a pre-Willisian circle of Willis, following Giulio Casseri (1552-1616) and Johann Vesling (1598-1649).</p>","PeriodicalId":49997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of the Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illustrations of the cerebrovascular system in Florentius Schuyl's Latin editions (1662, 1664) of René Descartes' <i>Treatise on Man</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Douglas J Lanska\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0964704X.2025.2557331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The <i>Treatise on Man</i> (1662, 1664) by French philosopher René Descartes (1596-1650) is the primary source for Cartesian physiology, but the accompanying illustrations were created <i>after</i> Descartes' death by a group of Descartes' disciples who were forced to create illustrations for Descartes' unfinished, and often vague and confusing, text. The iconographic tradition originating in the French edition (<i>L'Homme</i>, 1664) has predominated since the 17th century, whereas the Latin editions (<i>De Homine</i>, 1662, 1664) and their illustrations remain little known. Dutch physician and botanist Florentius Schuyl (1619-1669) both edited and illustrated the Latin editions with woodcuts and copperplate engravings. Although Schuyl faithfully illustrated Descartes' mistaken notions concerning the location and motility of the pineal gland, other mistakes and innovations were due to Schuyl rather than Descartes. These include (1) the mistake of illustrating the mythical human rete mirabile more than a century after Jacopo Berengario da Carpi (1460-1530) and Andreas Vesalius (1514-1564) had denied its existence in humans; (2) the mistake of illustrating an ungulate aortic arch as that of a human; and (3) the insight and courage to modify a Vesalian diagram to show a pre-Willisian circle of Willis, following Giulio Casseri (1552-1616) and Johann Vesling (1598-1649).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the History of the Neurosciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the History of the Neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2025.2557331\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of the Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2025.2557331","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Illustrations of the cerebrovascular system in Florentius Schuyl's Latin editions (1662, 1664) of René Descartes' Treatise on Man.
The Treatise on Man (1662, 1664) by French philosopher René Descartes (1596-1650) is the primary source for Cartesian physiology, but the accompanying illustrations were created after Descartes' death by a group of Descartes' disciples who were forced to create illustrations for Descartes' unfinished, and often vague and confusing, text. The iconographic tradition originating in the French edition (L'Homme, 1664) has predominated since the 17th century, whereas the Latin editions (De Homine, 1662, 1664) and their illustrations remain little known. Dutch physician and botanist Florentius Schuyl (1619-1669) both edited and illustrated the Latin editions with woodcuts and copperplate engravings. Although Schuyl faithfully illustrated Descartes' mistaken notions concerning the location and motility of the pineal gland, other mistakes and innovations were due to Schuyl rather than Descartes. These include (1) the mistake of illustrating the mythical human rete mirabile more than a century after Jacopo Berengario da Carpi (1460-1530) and Andreas Vesalius (1514-1564) had denied its existence in humans; (2) the mistake of illustrating an ungulate aortic arch as that of a human; and (3) the insight and courage to modify a Vesalian diagram to show a pre-Willisian circle of Willis, following Giulio Casseri (1552-1616) and Johann Vesling (1598-1649).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the History of the Neurosciences is the leading communication platform dealing with the historical roots of the basic and applied neurosciences. Its domains cover historical perspectives and developments, including biographical studies, disorders, institutions, documents, and instrumentation in neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropsychology, and the behavioral neurosciences. The history of ideas, changes in society and medicine, and the connections with other disciplines (e.g., the arts, philosophy, psychology) are welcome. In addition to original, full-length papers, the journal welcomes informative short communications, letters to the editors, book reviews, and contributions to its NeuroWords and Neurognostics columns. All manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by an Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, full- and short-length papers are subject to peer review (double blind, if requested) by at least 2 anonymous referees.