腹股沟穿刺30分钟内第一次通过效应的发生率和潜在预测因素:一项探索性单中心研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tshibambe Nathanael Tshimbombu, Shashvat Desai, Yaswanth Chintaluru, Paige Banyas, Angelina Cooper, Andrew Ducruet, Felipe C Albuquerque, Ashutosh Jadhav
{"title":"腹股沟穿刺30分钟内第一次通过效应的发生率和潜在预测因素:一项探索性单中心研究。","authors":"Tshibambe Nathanael Tshimbombu, Shashvat Desai, Yaswanth Chintaluru, Paige Banyas, Angelina Cooper, Andrew Ducruet, Felipe C Albuquerque, Ashutosh Jadhav","doi":"10.1177/15910199251380394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background and PurposeThe first pass effect (FPE), achieving near-complete revascularization in a single pass, predicts good outcomes in mechanical thrombectomy (MT). FPE30, achieving FPE within 30 min of groin puncture, is a novel procedural metric proposed as an indicator of maximal procedural and systems-level efficiency. This study aimed to determine the incidence of FPE30 and explore potential predictors in a real-world clinical setting, thereby assessing its utility as a performance benchmark.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 274 consecutive MT patients at a comprehensive stroke center. The primary outcome was FPE30, defined as achieving mTICI 2c-3 in a single pass within 30 min of groin puncture. Patient characteristics were compared between FPE30 and FPE > 30 groups.ResultsOf 274 patients, 52 (19.0%) achieved FPE; 43 (82.7%) met the FPE30 benchmark. No statistically significant predictors of FPE30 were found. Trends indicated FPE30 was less common in internal carotid artery (ICA) terminus occlusions (7.0% vs. 33.3%; <i>P</i> = .09) and more frequent with radial access (48.8% vs. 33.3%; <i>P</i> = .40). There was no significant difference in good 90-day functional outcomes (mRS 0-2) between FPE30 (34.9%) and FPE > 30 (33.3%) groups (<i>P</i> > .99).ConclusionsAchieving FPE within 30 min was common in this cohort, but not significantly predicted by measured factors. The lack of an association between FPE30 and improved 90-day functional outcomes suggests that the primary benefit is derived from achieving FPE itself, regardless of whether it is accomplished within or just beyond this ultra-early timeframe. Trends suggest occlusion location and access site may affect reperfusion speed. Lack of functional benefit difference highlights that FPE achievement itself remains the key outcome determinant. These findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant larger studies to clarify the value and predictors of FPE30 as both a clinical prognosticator and a quality improvement metric.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251380394"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence and potential predictors of first pass effect within 30 min of groin puncture: An exploratory single-center study.\",\"authors\":\"Tshibambe Nathanael Tshimbombu, Shashvat Desai, Yaswanth Chintaluru, Paige Banyas, Angelina Cooper, Andrew Ducruet, Felipe C Albuquerque, Ashutosh Jadhav\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199251380394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background and PurposeThe first pass effect (FPE), achieving near-complete revascularization in a single pass, predicts good outcomes in mechanical thrombectomy (MT). FPE30, achieving FPE within 30 min of groin puncture, is a novel procedural metric proposed as an indicator of maximal procedural and systems-level efficiency. This study aimed to determine the incidence of FPE30 and explore potential predictors in a real-world clinical setting, thereby assessing its utility as a performance benchmark.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 274 consecutive MT patients at a comprehensive stroke center. The primary outcome was FPE30, defined as achieving mTICI 2c-3 in a single pass within 30 min of groin puncture. Patient characteristics were compared between FPE30 and FPE > 30 groups.ResultsOf 274 patients, 52 (19.0%) achieved FPE; 43 (82.7%) met the FPE30 benchmark. No statistically significant predictors of FPE30 were found. Trends indicated FPE30 was less common in internal carotid artery (ICA) terminus occlusions (7.0% vs. 33.3%; <i>P</i> = .09) and more frequent with radial access (48.8% vs. 33.3%; <i>P</i> = .40). There was no significant difference in good 90-day functional outcomes (mRS 0-2) between FPE30 (34.9%) and FPE > 30 (33.3%) groups (<i>P</i> > .99).ConclusionsAchieving FPE within 30 min was common in this cohort, but not significantly predicted by measured factors. The lack of an association between FPE30 and improved 90-day functional outcomes suggests that the primary benefit is derived from achieving FPE itself, regardless of whether it is accomplished within or just beyond this ultra-early timeframe. Trends suggest occlusion location and access site may affect reperfusion speed. Lack of functional benefit difference highlights that FPE achievement itself remains the key outcome determinant. These findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant larger studies to clarify the value and predictors of FPE30 as both a clinical prognosticator and a quality improvement metric.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15910199251380394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460320/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251380394\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251380394","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的首通效应(first pass effect, FPE)可在单通中实现几乎完全的血运重建,预测机械取栓(MT)的良好预后。FPE30,在腹股沟穿刺30分钟内达到FPE,是一种新的程序指标,作为最大程序和系统级效率的指标。本研究旨在确定FPE30的发病率,并在现实世界的临床环境中探索潜在的预测因素,从而评估其作为性能基准的效用。方法回顾性分析某综合脑卒中中心连续收治的274例MT患者。主要终点是FPE30,定义为在腹股沟穿刺30分钟内单次通过达到mTICI 2c-3。比较FPE30组和FPE bbb30组的患者特征。结果274例患者中,52例(19.0%)实现FPE;43个(82.7%)达到FPE30基准。未发现FPE30有统计学意义的预测因子。趋势显示FPE30在颈内动脉(ICA)终末闭塞中较少见(7.0% vs. 33.3%; P =。09)和更频繁的径向通路(48.8%比33.3%;P = 0.40)。FPE30组(34.9%)和FPE bbb30组(33.3%)90天良好功能结局(mRS 0-2)无显著差异(P > .99)。结论:在30分钟内实现FPE在该队列中很常见,但测量因素无法显著预测。FPE30与改善的90天功能结果之间缺乏相关性,这表明主要的益处来自于实现FPE本身,无论是否在这个超早的时间框架内完成。趋势提示闭塞位置和通路位置可能影响再灌注速度。缺乏功能效益差异突出表明,FPE成就本身仍然是关键的结果决定因素。这些发现是假设的产生,需要更大规模的研究来阐明FPE30作为临床预后指标和质量改进指标的价值和预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidence and potential predictors of first pass effect within 30 min of groin puncture: An exploratory single-center study.

Background and PurposeThe first pass effect (FPE), achieving near-complete revascularization in a single pass, predicts good outcomes in mechanical thrombectomy (MT). FPE30, achieving FPE within 30 min of groin puncture, is a novel procedural metric proposed as an indicator of maximal procedural and systems-level efficiency. This study aimed to determine the incidence of FPE30 and explore potential predictors in a real-world clinical setting, thereby assessing its utility as a performance benchmark.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 274 consecutive MT patients at a comprehensive stroke center. The primary outcome was FPE30, defined as achieving mTICI 2c-3 in a single pass within 30 min of groin puncture. Patient characteristics were compared between FPE30 and FPE > 30 groups.ResultsOf 274 patients, 52 (19.0%) achieved FPE; 43 (82.7%) met the FPE30 benchmark. No statistically significant predictors of FPE30 were found. Trends indicated FPE30 was less common in internal carotid artery (ICA) terminus occlusions (7.0% vs. 33.3%; P = .09) and more frequent with radial access (48.8% vs. 33.3%; P = .40). There was no significant difference in good 90-day functional outcomes (mRS 0-2) between FPE30 (34.9%) and FPE > 30 (33.3%) groups (P > .99).ConclusionsAchieving FPE within 30 min was common in this cohort, but not significantly predicted by measured factors. The lack of an association between FPE30 and improved 90-day functional outcomes suggests that the primary benefit is derived from achieving FPE itself, regardless of whether it is accomplished within or just beyond this ultra-early timeframe. Trends suggest occlusion location and access site may affect reperfusion speed. Lack of functional benefit difference highlights that FPE achievement itself remains the key outcome determinant. These findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant larger studies to clarify the value and predictors of FPE30 as both a clinical prognosticator and a quality improvement metric.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信