美国产前护理利用的差异。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Pearl A McElfish, Aaron R Caldwell, James P Selig, Donya Watson, Jonathan Langner, Jennifer Callaghan-Koru, Austin Porter, Don E Willis, Jennifer A Andersen, Nicola L Hawley, Philmar Mendoza-Kabua, Clare C Brown
{"title":"美国产前护理利用的差异。","authors":"Pearl A McElfish, Aaron R Caldwell, James P Selig, Donya Watson, Jonathan Langner, Jennifer Callaghan-Koru, Austin Porter, Don E Willis, Jennifer A Andersen, Nicola L Hawley, Philmar Mendoza-Kabua, Clare C Brown","doi":"10.1007/s10995-025-04150-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined disparities in prenatal care utilization by race/ethnicity and payer using three measures of inadequate prenatal care: (1) fewer than the recommended number of prenatal care visits, (2) late initiation of prenatal care (at or after 4 months gestation), or (3) no prenatal care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Birth records data from the National Center for Health Statistics were used. The study population consisted of singleton live births in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2022 (N = 33,107,382).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average number of reported prenatal care visits was 11.2 (SD = 1.2), 36.8% reported fewer than the recommended number of prenatal care visits, 22.7% reported late initiation of prenatal care, and 1.8% reported no prenatal care. Women with a Medicaid-covered delivery were 1.06 times more likely to have fewer than the recommended number of visits, 1.36 times more likely to initiate prenatal care late, and 1.72 times more likely to have no prenatal visits (all p < 0.001). There were significant disparities in prenatal care utilization by race/ethnicity, particularly for NHPI and AIAN women, with all minoritized racial/ethnic groups having greater risk for multiple measures of inadequate prenatal care utilization relative to White populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions for practice: </strong>Racial/ethnic and economic disparities in perinatal health in the U.S. are of national concern. Differences in prenatal care utilization between women with Medicaid and private/other insurance suggest modifications to Medicaid policies may improve prenatal care access among beneficiaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":48367,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in Prenatal Care Utilization in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Pearl A McElfish, Aaron R Caldwell, James P Selig, Donya Watson, Jonathan Langner, Jennifer Callaghan-Koru, Austin Porter, Don E Willis, Jennifer A Andersen, Nicola L Hawley, Philmar Mendoza-Kabua, Clare C Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10995-025-04150-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined disparities in prenatal care utilization by race/ethnicity and payer using three measures of inadequate prenatal care: (1) fewer than the recommended number of prenatal care visits, (2) late initiation of prenatal care (at or after 4 months gestation), or (3) no prenatal care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Birth records data from the National Center for Health Statistics were used. The study population consisted of singleton live births in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2022 (N = 33,107,382).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average number of reported prenatal care visits was 11.2 (SD = 1.2), 36.8% reported fewer than the recommended number of prenatal care visits, 22.7% reported late initiation of prenatal care, and 1.8% reported no prenatal care. Women with a Medicaid-covered delivery were 1.06 times more likely to have fewer than the recommended number of visits, 1.36 times more likely to initiate prenatal care late, and 1.72 times more likely to have no prenatal visits (all p < 0.001). There were significant disparities in prenatal care utilization by race/ethnicity, particularly for NHPI and AIAN women, with all minoritized racial/ethnic groups having greater risk for multiple measures of inadequate prenatal care utilization relative to White populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions for practice: </strong>Racial/ethnic and economic disparities in perinatal health in the U.S. are of national concern. Differences in prenatal care utilization between women with Medicaid and private/other insurance suggest modifications to Medicaid policies may improve prenatal care access among beneficiaries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maternal and Child Health Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maternal and Child Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04150-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04150-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究考察了不同种族/民族和付款人在产前护理利用方面的差异,采用产前护理不足的三种措施:(1)少于建议的产前护理访问次数,(2)产前护理开始较晚(妊娠4个月或之后),或(3)没有产前护理。方法:使用国家卫生统计中心的出生记录数据。研究人群包括2014年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间美国所有50个州和哥伦比亚特区的单胎活产婴儿(N = 33,107,382)。结果:报告的平均产前护理次数为11.2次(SD = 1.2), 36.8%的人报告产前护理次数少于建议的次数,22.7%的人报告产前护理开始晚,1.8%的人报告没有产前护理。在医疗补助范围内分娩的妇女,比推荐的检查次数少的可能性是1.06倍,产前护理延迟的可能性是1.36倍,没有产前检查的可能性是1.72倍(所有p结论:美国围产期健康的种族/民族和经济差异是全国关注的问题)。医疗补助和私人/其他保险的妇女之间产前护理利用的差异表明,医疗补助政策的修改可能会改善受益人的产前护理机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparities in Prenatal Care Utilization in the United States.

Objectives: This study examined disparities in prenatal care utilization by race/ethnicity and payer using three measures of inadequate prenatal care: (1) fewer than the recommended number of prenatal care visits, (2) late initiation of prenatal care (at or after 4 months gestation), or (3) no prenatal care.

Methods: Birth records data from the National Center for Health Statistics were used. The study population consisted of singleton live births in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2022 (N = 33,107,382).

Results: The average number of reported prenatal care visits was 11.2 (SD = 1.2), 36.8% reported fewer than the recommended number of prenatal care visits, 22.7% reported late initiation of prenatal care, and 1.8% reported no prenatal care. Women with a Medicaid-covered delivery were 1.06 times more likely to have fewer than the recommended number of visits, 1.36 times more likely to initiate prenatal care late, and 1.72 times more likely to have no prenatal visits (all p < 0.001). There were significant disparities in prenatal care utilization by race/ethnicity, particularly for NHPI and AIAN women, with all minoritized racial/ethnic groups having greater risk for multiple measures of inadequate prenatal care utilization relative to White populations.

Conclusions for practice: Racial/ethnic and economic disparities in perinatal health in the U.S. are of national concern. Differences in prenatal care utilization between women with Medicaid and private/other insurance suggest modifications to Medicaid policies may improve prenatal care access among beneficiaries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Maternal and Child Health Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
271
期刊介绍: Maternal and Child Health Journal is the first exclusive forum to advance the scientific and professional knowledge base of the maternal and child health (MCH) field. This bimonthly provides peer-reviewed papers addressing the following areas of MCH practice, policy, and research: MCH epidemiology, demography, and health status assessment Innovative MCH service initiatives Implementation of MCH programs MCH policy analysis and advocacy MCH professional development. Exploring the full spectrum of the MCH field, Maternal and Child Health Journal is an important tool for practitioners as well as academics in public health, obstetrics, gynecology, prenatal medicine, pediatrics, and neonatology. Sponsors include the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), the Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health (ATMCH), and CityMatCH.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信