介绍TDM-20:一个经过验证的20项测量团队发展的工具。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hiroto Inoue, Kathryn Bonuck, Patricia A Carney, Daisuke Yamashita
{"title":"介绍TDM-20:一个经过验证的20项测量团队发展的工具。","authors":"Hiroto Inoue, Kathryn Bonuck, Patricia A Carney, Daisuke Yamashita","doi":"10.22454/FamMed.2025.548925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Research has shown that effective team functioning increases patient satisfaction and reduces medical errors and burnout. The Team Development Measure (TDM), a 31-item instrument, was validated to assess four areas of team development: cohesion, communication, roles and goals, and team priorities. Despite its high reliability and psychometric validity, the large number of items in the TDM may be a barrier to its use in busy health care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the original dataset of 1,194 participants from 120 primary care teams, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis. We used principal component analysis with varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization to validate a 20-item shortened version (TDM-20). We also performed a scree test as a parallel analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our exploratory factor analysis identified two domains in the TDM-20. The first was communication and engagement, which we defined as team members' ability to respectfully interact toward accomplishing goals. The second domain was shared values and cohesion, which we defined as core beliefs that guide the behaviors of a group from an empathetic and psychologically safe position. Each domain comprised 10 items. The eigenvalues for the two domains were 10.9 and 1.10, accounting for 54.5% and 5.5% of the variance, respectively. Both domains demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α were 0.92 and 0.93, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TDM-20 demonstrated high validity and is suitable for measuring team development in primary care medical settings. Further research is needed to examine whether the pandemic affected the results of the instrument in various cultural backgrounds and current medical environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introducing the TDM-20: A Validated 20-Item Instrument to Measure Team Development.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroto Inoue, Kathryn Bonuck, Patricia A Carney, Daisuke Yamashita\",\"doi\":\"10.22454/FamMed.2025.548925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Research has shown that effective team functioning increases patient satisfaction and reduces medical errors and burnout. The Team Development Measure (TDM), a 31-item instrument, was validated to assess four areas of team development: cohesion, communication, roles and goals, and team priorities. Despite its high reliability and psychometric validity, the large number of items in the TDM may be a barrier to its use in busy health care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the original dataset of 1,194 participants from 120 primary care teams, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis. We used principal component analysis with varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization to validate a 20-item shortened version (TDM-20). We also performed a scree test as a parallel analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our exploratory factor analysis identified two domains in the TDM-20. The first was communication and engagement, which we defined as team members' ability to respectfully interact toward accomplishing goals. The second domain was shared values and cohesion, which we defined as core beliefs that guide the behaviors of a group from an empathetic and psychologically safe position. Each domain comprised 10 items. The eigenvalues for the two domains were 10.9 and 1.10, accounting for 54.5% and 5.5% of the variance, respectively. Both domains demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α were 0.92 and 0.93, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TDM-20 demonstrated high validity and is suitable for measuring team development in primary care medical settings. Further research is needed to examine whether the pandemic affected the results of the instrument in various cultural backgrounds and current medical environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2025.548925\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2025.548925","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:研究表明,有效的团队运作可以提高患者满意度,减少医疗差错和职业倦怠。团队发展测量(TDM),一个包含31个项目的工具,被验证来评估团队发展的四个方面:凝聚力,沟通,角色和目标,以及团队优先级。尽管TDM具有很高的信度和心理效度,但在繁忙的卫生保健环境中,大量的项目可能是其使用的障碍。方法:使用来自120个初级保健团队的1194名参与者的原始数据集,我们进行了探索性因素分析。我们使用主成分分析和可变旋转和Kaiser归一化来验证20项缩短版本(TDM-20)。我们还执行了一个屏幕测试作为并行分析。结果:我们的探索性因子分析在TDM-20中发现了两个域。第一个是沟通和参与,我们将其定义为团队成员为完成目标而相互尊重的能力。第二个领域是共同的价值观和凝聚力,我们将其定义为从同情和心理安全的角度指导群体行为的核心信念。每个域包含10个条目。两个域的特征值分别为10.9和1.10,分别占方差的54.5%和5.5%。两个域具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach’s α分别为0.92和0.93)。结论:TDM-20具有较高的效度,适用于基层医疗机构团队发展的测量。需要进一步研究,以检查大流行是否影响了该工具在不同文化背景和当前医疗环境中的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introducing the TDM-20: A Validated 20-Item Instrument to Measure Team Development.

Background and objectives: Research has shown that effective team functioning increases patient satisfaction and reduces medical errors and burnout. The Team Development Measure (TDM), a 31-item instrument, was validated to assess four areas of team development: cohesion, communication, roles and goals, and team priorities. Despite its high reliability and psychometric validity, the large number of items in the TDM may be a barrier to its use in busy health care settings.

Methods: Using the original dataset of 1,194 participants from 120 primary care teams, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis. We used principal component analysis with varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization to validate a 20-item shortened version (TDM-20). We also performed a scree test as a parallel analysis.

Results: Our exploratory factor analysis identified two domains in the TDM-20. The first was communication and engagement, which we defined as team members' ability to respectfully interact toward accomplishing goals. The second domain was shared values and cohesion, which we defined as core beliefs that guide the behaviors of a group from an empathetic and psychologically safe position. Each domain comprised 10 items. The eigenvalues for the two domains were 10.9 and 1.10, accounting for 54.5% and 5.5% of the variance, respectively. Both domains demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α were 0.92 and 0.93, respectively).

Conclusions: The TDM-20 demonstrated high validity and is suitable for measuring team development in primary care medical settings. Further research is needed to examine whether the pandemic affected the results of the instrument in various cultural backgrounds and current medical environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family Medicine
Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信