Hiroto Inoue, Kathryn Bonuck, Patricia A Carney, Daisuke Yamashita
{"title":"介绍TDM-20:一个经过验证的20项测量团队发展的工具。","authors":"Hiroto Inoue, Kathryn Bonuck, Patricia A Carney, Daisuke Yamashita","doi":"10.22454/FamMed.2025.548925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Research has shown that effective team functioning increases patient satisfaction and reduces medical errors and burnout. The Team Development Measure (TDM), a 31-item instrument, was validated to assess four areas of team development: cohesion, communication, roles and goals, and team priorities. Despite its high reliability and psychometric validity, the large number of items in the TDM may be a barrier to its use in busy health care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the original dataset of 1,194 participants from 120 primary care teams, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis. We used principal component analysis with varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization to validate a 20-item shortened version (TDM-20). We also performed a scree test as a parallel analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our exploratory factor analysis identified two domains in the TDM-20. The first was communication and engagement, which we defined as team members' ability to respectfully interact toward accomplishing goals. The second domain was shared values and cohesion, which we defined as core beliefs that guide the behaviors of a group from an empathetic and psychologically safe position. Each domain comprised 10 items. The eigenvalues for the two domains were 10.9 and 1.10, accounting for 54.5% and 5.5% of the variance, respectively. Both domains demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α were 0.92 and 0.93, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TDM-20 demonstrated high validity and is suitable for measuring team development in primary care medical settings. Further research is needed to examine whether the pandemic affected the results of the instrument in various cultural backgrounds and current medical environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introducing the TDM-20: A Validated 20-Item Instrument to Measure Team Development.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroto Inoue, Kathryn Bonuck, Patricia A Carney, Daisuke Yamashita\",\"doi\":\"10.22454/FamMed.2025.548925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Research has shown that effective team functioning increases patient satisfaction and reduces medical errors and burnout. The Team Development Measure (TDM), a 31-item instrument, was validated to assess four areas of team development: cohesion, communication, roles and goals, and team priorities. Despite its high reliability and psychometric validity, the large number of items in the TDM may be a barrier to its use in busy health care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the original dataset of 1,194 participants from 120 primary care teams, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis. We used principal component analysis with varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization to validate a 20-item shortened version (TDM-20). We also performed a scree test as a parallel analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our exploratory factor analysis identified two domains in the TDM-20. The first was communication and engagement, which we defined as team members' ability to respectfully interact toward accomplishing goals. The second domain was shared values and cohesion, which we defined as core beliefs that guide the behaviors of a group from an empathetic and psychologically safe position. Each domain comprised 10 items. The eigenvalues for the two domains were 10.9 and 1.10, accounting for 54.5% and 5.5% of the variance, respectively. Both domains demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α were 0.92 and 0.93, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TDM-20 demonstrated high validity and is suitable for measuring team development in primary care medical settings. Further research is needed to examine whether the pandemic affected the results of the instrument in various cultural backgrounds and current medical environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2025.548925\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2025.548925","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Introducing the TDM-20: A Validated 20-Item Instrument to Measure Team Development.
Background and objectives: Research has shown that effective team functioning increases patient satisfaction and reduces medical errors and burnout. The Team Development Measure (TDM), a 31-item instrument, was validated to assess four areas of team development: cohesion, communication, roles and goals, and team priorities. Despite its high reliability and psychometric validity, the large number of items in the TDM may be a barrier to its use in busy health care settings.
Methods: Using the original dataset of 1,194 participants from 120 primary care teams, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis. We used principal component analysis with varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization to validate a 20-item shortened version (TDM-20). We also performed a scree test as a parallel analysis.
Results: Our exploratory factor analysis identified two domains in the TDM-20. The first was communication and engagement, which we defined as team members' ability to respectfully interact toward accomplishing goals. The second domain was shared values and cohesion, which we defined as core beliefs that guide the behaviors of a group from an empathetic and psychologically safe position. Each domain comprised 10 items. The eigenvalues for the two domains were 10.9 and 1.10, accounting for 54.5% and 5.5% of the variance, respectively. Both domains demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α were 0.92 and 0.93, respectively).
Conclusions: The TDM-20 demonstrated high validity and is suitable for measuring team development in primary care medical settings. Further research is needed to examine whether the pandemic affected the results of the instrument in various cultural backgrounds and current medical environments.
期刊介绍:
Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.