广泛生理特征的无监督聚类证实了五阶段睡眠分期范式。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Sleep Pub Date : 2025-09-23 DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsaf284
Yulin Ma, Chunping Li, Yiwen Xu, Xiaodan Tan, Xuefei Yu, Chang'an A Zhan
{"title":"广泛生理特征的无监督聚类证实了五阶段睡眠分期范式。","authors":"Yulin Ma, Chunping Li, Yiwen Xu, Xiaodan Tan, Xuefei Yu, Chang'an A Zhan","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsaf284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditional sleep staging, guided by the AASM scoring manual, categorizes sleep into five discrete stages based on visual analysis of electrophysiological signals by human expert. However, the rationale for the staging number remains underexplored, and sleep scoring results show low inter-rater agreement, due to such possible factors as subjective judgment, expertise variability among human experts, and limited number of signal features in the AASM manual. To address these limitations, we developed an unsupervised clustering framework incorporating a large set of features from EEG, EOG and EMG signals, including but not limited to the AASM visual features, and performing sleep staging without relying on pre-defined scoring rules. This data-driven approach shows that the sleep data can be optimally partitioned into five clusters, which correspond well to the five sleep stages defined in the AASM scoring manual. Importantly, the algorithm recognizes over 80% of AASM visual features, and additionally uncovers many features not mentioned in the AASM scoring manual. Detailed analysis into epochs inconsistently scored by the algorithm and by the human expert shows that the algorithm provides more interpretable results. The present study offers well-grounded evidence supporting that sleep should be partitioned into five stages. The findings also suggest that more features in the sleep data should be utilized in addition to those included in the AASM scoring manual for more accurate sleep scoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":22018,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unsupervised Clustering of Extensive Physiological Features Substantiates Five-Stage Sleep Staging Paradigm.\",\"authors\":\"Yulin Ma, Chunping Li, Yiwen Xu, Xiaodan Tan, Xuefei Yu, Chang'an A Zhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sleep/zsaf284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Traditional sleep staging, guided by the AASM scoring manual, categorizes sleep into five discrete stages based on visual analysis of electrophysiological signals by human expert. However, the rationale for the staging number remains underexplored, and sleep scoring results show low inter-rater agreement, due to such possible factors as subjective judgment, expertise variability among human experts, and limited number of signal features in the AASM manual. To address these limitations, we developed an unsupervised clustering framework incorporating a large set of features from EEG, EOG and EMG signals, including but not limited to the AASM visual features, and performing sleep staging without relying on pre-defined scoring rules. This data-driven approach shows that the sleep data can be optimally partitioned into five clusters, which correspond well to the five sleep stages defined in the AASM scoring manual. Importantly, the algorithm recognizes over 80% of AASM visual features, and additionally uncovers many features not mentioned in the AASM scoring manual. Detailed analysis into epochs inconsistently scored by the algorithm and by the human expert shows that the algorithm provides more interpretable results. The present study offers well-grounded evidence supporting that sleep should be partitioned into five stages. The findings also suggest that more features in the sleep data should be utilized in addition to those included in the AASM scoring manual for more accurate sleep scoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaf284\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaf284","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的睡眠分期是在AASM评分手册的指导下,由人类专家对电生理信号进行视觉分析,将睡眠分为五个独立的阶段。然而,分期数的基本原理仍未得到充分探讨,由于主观判断、人类专家的专业知识差异以及AASM手册中信号特征数量有限等可能的因素,睡眠评分结果显示评分者之间的一致性较低。为了解决这些限制,我们开发了一个无监督聚类框架,该框架结合了来自EEG, EOG和EMG信号的大量特征,包括但不限于AASM视觉特征,并在不依赖预定义评分规则的情况下进行睡眠分期。这种数据驱动的方法表明,睡眠数据可以最佳地划分为五个簇,这与AASM评分手册中定义的五个睡眠阶段相对应。重要的是,该算法识别了超过80%的AASM视觉特征,并且还发现了许多在AASM评分手册中没有提到的特征。对算法与人类专家评分不一致的时代进行了详细分析,结果表明该算法提供了更好的可解释性。目前的研究提供了充分的证据支持睡眠应该分为五个阶段。研究结果还表明,除了AASM评分手册中包含的特征外,还应该利用睡眠数据中的更多特征来进行更准确的睡眠评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unsupervised Clustering of Extensive Physiological Features Substantiates Five-Stage Sleep Staging Paradigm.

Traditional sleep staging, guided by the AASM scoring manual, categorizes sleep into five discrete stages based on visual analysis of electrophysiological signals by human expert. However, the rationale for the staging number remains underexplored, and sleep scoring results show low inter-rater agreement, due to such possible factors as subjective judgment, expertise variability among human experts, and limited number of signal features in the AASM manual. To address these limitations, we developed an unsupervised clustering framework incorporating a large set of features from EEG, EOG and EMG signals, including but not limited to the AASM visual features, and performing sleep staging without relying on pre-defined scoring rules. This data-driven approach shows that the sleep data can be optimally partitioned into five clusters, which correspond well to the five sleep stages defined in the AASM scoring manual. Importantly, the algorithm recognizes over 80% of AASM visual features, and additionally uncovers many features not mentioned in the AASM scoring manual. Detailed analysis into epochs inconsistently scored by the algorithm and by the human expert shows that the algorithm provides more interpretable results. The present study offers well-grounded evidence supporting that sleep should be partitioned into five stages. The findings also suggest that more features in the sleep data should be utilized in addition to those included in the AASM scoring manual for more accurate sleep scoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep
Sleep Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
10.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including: Genes Molecules Cells Physiology Neural systems and circuits Behavior and cognition Self-report SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to: Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信