轻至中度智力残疾患者自我报告疼痛:可行吗?

4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Psychiatria Danubina Pub Date : 2025-09-01
Ornella Ciccone, Alessandro Lepri, Olga Zaffini, Guido Camanni, Massimo Vallasciani, Antonella Baglioni, Chiara Tinarelli, Alessandro Jenkner, Michele Salata, Sandro Elisei
{"title":"轻至中度智力残疾患者自我报告疼痛:可行吗?","authors":"Ornella Ciccone, Alessandro Lepri, Olga Zaffini, Guido Camanni, Massimo Vallasciani, Antonella Baglioni, Chiara Tinarelli, Alessandro Jenkner, Michele Salata, Sandro Elisei","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The assessment of pain in people with intellectual disabilities (individuals with ID) represents a clinical challenge due to the variability in communicative and cognitive skills. This study explores the feasibility of pain self-reporting in individuals with mild to moderate intellectual disability using validated self-assessment scales. Our findings suggest that, under appropriate conditions, self-reporting can be a reliable and empowering method for pain evaluation in this population. This approach may foster autonomy, improve care, and counteract the undervaluation of subjective pain reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":20760,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatria Danubina","volume":"37 Suppl 1","pages":"309-314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SELF-REPORTING OF PAIN IN PEOPLE WITH MILD TO MODERATE INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY: IS IT FEASIBLE?\",\"authors\":\"Ornella Ciccone, Alessandro Lepri, Olga Zaffini, Guido Camanni, Massimo Vallasciani, Antonella Baglioni, Chiara Tinarelli, Alessandro Jenkner, Michele Salata, Sandro Elisei\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The assessment of pain in people with intellectual disabilities (individuals with ID) represents a clinical challenge due to the variability in communicative and cognitive skills. This study explores the feasibility of pain self-reporting in individuals with mild to moderate intellectual disability using validated self-assessment scales. Our findings suggest that, under appropriate conditions, self-reporting can be a reliable and empowering method for pain evaluation in this population. This approach may foster autonomy, improve care, and counteract the undervaluation of subjective pain reports.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatria Danubina\",\"volume\":\"37 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"309-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatria Danubina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatria Danubina","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于交流和认知技能的差异,对智力残疾者(ID个体)疼痛的评估是一项临床挑战。本研究探讨了使用有效的自我评估量表对轻至中度智力残疾患者进行疼痛自我报告的可行性。我们的研究结果表明,在适当的条件下,自我报告可以成为这一人群疼痛评估的可靠和授权方法。这种方法可以促进自主性,改善护理,并抵消主观疼痛报告的低估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SELF-REPORTING OF PAIN IN PEOPLE WITH MILD TO MODERATE INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY: IS IT FEASIBLE?

The assessment of pain in people with intellectual disabilities (individuals with ID) represents a clinical challenge due to the variability in communicative and cognitive skills. This study explores the feasibility of pain self-reporting in individuals with mild to moderate intellectual disability using validated self-assessment scales. Our findings suggest that, under appropriate conditions, self-reporting can be a reliable and empowering method for pain evaluation in this population. This approach may foster autonomy, improve care, and counteract the undervaluation of subjective pain reports.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatria Danubina
Psychiatria Danubina 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
288
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatria Danubina is a peer-reviewed open access journal of the Psychiatric Danubian Association, aimed to publish original scientific contributions in psychiatry, psychological medicine and related science (neurosciences, biological, psychological, and social sciences as well as philosophy of science and medical ethics, history, organization and economics of mental health services).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信