临床实践中智障患者疼痛量表的实施:研究后随访。

4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Psychiatria Danubina Pub Date : 2025-09-01
Ornella Ciccone, Olga Zaffini, Alessandro Lepri, Guido Camanni, Massimo Vallasciani, Antonella Baglioni, Chiara Tinarelli, Sandro Elisei
{"title":"临床实践中智障患者疼痛量表的实施:研究后随访。","authors":"Ornella Ciccone, Olga Zaffini, Alessandro Lepri, Guido Camanni, Massimo Vallasciani, Antonella Baglioni, Chiara Tinarelli, Sandro Elisei","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessing pain in people with intellectual disabilities (PWID), particularly those with multiple sensory and motor impairments, is a complex clinical challenge often overlooked, leading to the risk of underestimating pain. The Serafico Institute in Assisi investigated pain assessment in this population using the revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (R-FLACC) scale and self-report tools. This follow-up study examined the reporting of unexplained behavioral changes and the use of pain scales in routine clinical practice one year after the initial research. A total of 110 participants (72% male; mean age 27 years, range 2-54) were enrolled, including 27 children (25%) and 83 adults (75%). Over seven months, 252 episodes of unexplained behavioral changes were recorded: 227 (90%) assessed with R-FLACC and 25 (10%) via self-report. Of these, 148 (59%) were classified as pain-related, 83 (33%) as distress episodes, and 21 (7%) remained unexplained. The number of episodes reported and consistent use of pain scales, indicate heightened awareness among healthcare and educational staff towards unexplained behaviors that might signal pain, prompting appropriate evaluation and treatment. Pain assessment has now become an integral component of Serafico Institute's clinical practice and operational guidelines for PWID.</p>","PeriodicalId":20760,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatria Danubina","volume":"37 Suppl 1","pages":"305-308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IMPLEMENTATION OF PAIN SCALE USE IN PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE: A POST-STUDY FOLLOW-UP.\",\"authors\":\"Ornella Ciccone, Olga Zaffini, Alessandro Lepri, Guido Camanni, Massimo Vallasciani, Antonella Baglioni, Chiara Tinarelli, Sandro Elisei\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Assessing pain in people with intellectual disabilities (PWID), particularly those with multiple sensory and motor impairments, is a complex clinical challenge often overlooked, leading to the risk of underestimating pain. The Serafico Institute in Assisi investigated pain assessment in this population using the revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (R-FLACC) scale and self-report tools. This follow-up study examined the reporting of unexplained behavioral changes and the use of pain scales in routine clinical practice one year after the initial research. A total of 110 participants (72% male; mean age 27 years, range 2-54) were enrolled, including 27 children (25%) and 83 adults (75%). Over seven months, 252 episodes of unexplained behavioral changes were recorded: 227 (90%) assessed with R-FLACC and 25 (10%) via self-report. Of these, 148 (59%) were classified as pain-related, 83 (33%) as distress episodes, and 21 (7%) remained unexplained. The number of episodes reported and consistent use of pain scales, indicate heightened awareness among healthcare and educational staff towards unexplained behaviors that might signal pain, prompting appropriate evaluation and treatment. Pain assessment has now become an integral component of Serafico Institute's clinical practice and operational guidelines for PWID.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatria Danubina\",\"volume\":\"37 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"305-308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatria Danubina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatria Danubina","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估智力残疾者(PWID)的疼痛,特别是那些有多重感觉和运动障碍的人,是一项复杂的临床挑战,经常被忽视,导致低估疼痛的风险。阿西西的塞拉菲科研究所使用修订后的面部、腿部、活动、哭泣、安慰(R-FLACC)量表和自我报告工具调查了这一人群的疼痛评估。这项后续研究调查了最初研究一年后报告的无法解释的行为改变和在常规临床实践中使用疼痛量表的情况。共纳入110名参与者(72%为男性,平均年龄27岁,2-54岁),包括27名儿童(25%)和83名成人(75%)。在7个月的时间里,记录了252次无法解释的行为改变:227次(90%)用R-FLACC评估,25次(10%)通过自我报告。其中,148例(59%)归类为疼痛相关,83例(33%)为痛苦发作,21例(7%)仍无法解释。报告的发作次数和疼痛量表的一致使用表明,卫生保健和教育人员对可能表明疼痛的无法解释的行为的认识有所提高,促使适当的评估和治疗。疼痛评估现在已经成为塞拉菲科研究所临床实践和PWID操作指南的一个组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IMPLEMENTATION OF PAIN SCALE USE IN PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE: A POST-STUDY FOLLOW-UP.

Assessing pain in people with intellectual disabilities (PWID), particularly those with multiple sensory and motor impairments, is a complex clinical challenge often overlooked, leading to the risk of underestimating pain. The Serafico Institute in Assisi investigated pain assessment in this population using the revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (R-FLACC) scale and self-report tools. This follow-up study examined the reporting of unexplained behavioral changes and the use of pain scales in routine clinical practice one year after the initial research. A total of 110 participants (72% male; mean age 27 years, range 2-54) were enrolled, including 27 children (25%) and 83 adults (75%). Over seven months, 252 episodes of unexplained behavioral changes were recorded: 227 (90%) assessed with R-FLACC and 25 (10%) via self-report. Of these, 148 (59%) were classified as pain-related, 83 (33%) as distress episodes, and 21 (7%) remained unexplained. The number of episodes reported and consistent use of pain scales, indicate heightened awareness among healthcare and educational staff towards unexplained behaviors that might signal pain, prompting appropriate evaluation and treatment. Pain assessment has now become an integral component of Serafico Institute's clinical practice and operational guidelines for PWID.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatria Danubina
Psychiatria Danubina 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
288
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatria Danubina is a peer-reviewed open access journal of the Psychiatric Danubian Association, aimed to publish original scientific contributions in psychiatry, psychological medicine and related science (neurosciences, biological, psychological, and social sciences as well as philosophy of science and medical ethics, history, organization and economics of mental health services).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信