{"title":"临床实践中智障患者疼痛量表的实施:研究后随访。","authors":"Ornella Ciccone, Olga Zaffini, Alessandro Lepri, Guido Camanni, Massimo Vallasciani, Antonella Baglioni, Chiara Tinarelli, Sandro Elisei","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessing pain in people with intellectual disabilities (PWID), particularly those with multiple sensory and motor impairments, is a complex clinical challenge often overlooked, leading to the risk of underestimating pain. The Serafico Institute in Assisi investigated pain assessment in this population using the revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (R-FLACC) scale and self-report tools. This follow-up study examined the reporting of unexplained behavioral changes and the use of pain scales in routine clinical practice one year after the initial research. A total of 110 participants (72% male; mean age 27 years, range 2-54) were enrolled, including 27 children (25%) and 83 adults (75%). Over seven months, 252 episodes of unexplained behavioral changes were recorded: 227 (90%) assessed with R-FLACC and 25 (10%) via self-report. Of these, 148 (59%) were classified as pain-related, 83 (33%) as distress episodes, and 21 (7%) remained unexplained. The number of episodes reported and consistent use of pain scales, indicate heightened awareness among healthcare and educational staff towards unexplained behaviors that might signal pain, prompting appropriate evaluation and treatment. Pain assessment has now become an integral component of Serafico Institute's clinical practice and operational guidelines for PWID.</p>","PeriodicalId":20760,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatria Danubina","volume":"37 Suppl 1","pages":"305-308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IMPLEMENTATION OF PAIN SCALE USE IN PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE: A POST-STUDY FOLLOW-UP.\",\"authors\":\"Ornella Ciccone, Olga Zaffini, Alessandro Lepri, Guido Camanni, Massimo Vallasciani, Antonella Baglioni, Chiara Tinarelli, Sandro Elisei\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Assessing pain in people with intellectual disabilities (PWID), particularly those with multiple sensory and motor impairments, is a complex clinical challenge often overlooked, leading to the risk of underestimating pain. The Serafico Institute in Assisi investigated pain assessment in this population using the revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (R-FLACC) scale and self-report tools. This follow-up study examined the reporting of unexplained behavioral changes and the use of pain scales in routine clinical practice one year after the initial research. A total of 110 participants (72% male; mean age 27 years, range 2-54) were enrolled, including 27 children (25%) and 83 adults (75%). Over seven months, 252 episodes of unexplained behavioral changes were recorded: 227 (90%) assessed with R-FLACC and 25 (10%) via self-report. Of these, 148 (59%) were classified as pain-related, 83 (33%) as distress episodes, and 21 (7%) remained unexplained. The number of episodes reported and consistent use of pain scales, indicate heightened awareness among healthcare and educational staff towards unexplained behaviors that might signal pain, prompting appropriate evaluation and treatment. Pain assessment has now become an integral component of Serafico Institute's clinical practice and operational guidelines for PWID.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatria Danubina\",\"volume\":\"37 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"305-308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatria Danubina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatria Danubina","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
IMPLEMENTATION OF PAIN SCALE USE IN PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE: A POST-STUDY FOLLOW-UP.
Assessing pain in people with intellectual disabilities (PWID), particularly those with multiple sensory and motor impairments, is a complex clinical challenge often overlooked, leading to the risk of underestimating pain. The Serafico Institute in Assisi investigated pain assessment in this population using the revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (R-FLACC) scale and self-report tools. This follow-up study examined the reporting of unexplained behavioral changes and the use of pain scales in routine clinical practice one year after the initial research. A total of 110 participants (72% male; mean age 27 years, range 2-54) were enrolled, including 27 children (25%) and 83 adults (75%). Over seven months, 252 episodes of unexplained behavioral changes were recorded: 227 (90%) assessed with R-FLACC and 25 (10%) via self-report. Of these, 148 (59%) were classified as pain-related, 83 (33%) as distress episodes, and 21 (7%) remained unexplained. The number of episodes reported and consistent use of pain scales, indicate heightened awareness among healthcare and educational staff towards unexplained behaviors that might signal pain, prompting appropriate evaluation and treatment. Pain assessment has now become an integral component of Serafico Institute's clinical practice and operational guidelines for PWID.
期刊介绍:
Psychiatria Danubina is a peer-reviewed open access journal of the Psychiatric Danubian Association, aimed to publish original scientific contributions in psychiatry, psychological medicine and related science (neurosciences, biological, psychological, and social sciences as well as philosophy of science and medical ethics, history, organization and economics of mental health services).