5%葡萄糖与生理盐水肩关节液胀术治疗肩周炎的疗效比较。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Xingyu Li, Jingyi Xie, Xinxiang Zhang, Xiaoxiao Guo, Yan Li, Qin Yin
{"title":"5%葡萄糖与生理盐水肩关节液胀术治疗肩周炎的疗效比较。","authors":"Xingyu Li, Jingyi Xie, Xinxiang Zhang, Xiaoxiao Guo, Yan Li, Qin Yin","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgaf157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a 5% glucose solution compared to normal saline for treating frozen shoulder via shoulder joint hydraulic distension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 100 participants were randomly assigned to either the 5% glucose group (1 ml compound betamethasone +4 ml 2% lidocaine +15 ml 5% glucose) or the saline group (1 ml compound betamethasone +4 ml 2% lidocaine +15 ml normal saline). Patients were assessed at 1, 4, and 12 weeks post-treatment using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, the Numerical Rating Scale for pain, and active range of motion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Substantial improvements were demonstrated by both treatment groups at all follow-up points (1, 4, and 12 weeks), as reflected by a decrease in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index score. However, the 5% glucose group showed significantly lower Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores than the saline group at 4 and 12 weeks (P = 0.003 and P < 0.05, respectively). This group also experienced significantly greater improvements in shoulder abduction at 4 weeks (P = 0.003) and extension at 12 weeks (P = 0.001) than the saline group. No significant differences were noted between the groups in Numerical Rating Scale scores or shoulder range of motion at other time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with painful frozen shoulder lasting over a month, both treatments resulted in substantial pain relief and improved function. The 5% glucose solution produced more pronounced benefits at 4 and 12 weeks, particularly with regard to pain relief and increased shoulder mobility. Key messages What is already known about this topic: Although extensive research has been conducted on frozen shoulder, the most effective treatment has yet to be identified. What does this study contribute: This is the first study to use a 5% glucose solution as the primary distending agent in shoulder joint hydraulic distension for frozen shoulder (FS), which is a novel approach not previously explored in the literature. How might this study affect research, practice or policy: This study provides a new clinical protocol for the treatment of frozen shoulder.</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of the efficacy of 5% glucose and saline solution in shoulder joint hydraulic distension for the treatment of frozen shoulder.\",\"authors\":\"Xingyu Li, Jingyi Xie, Xinxiang Zhang, Xiaoxiao Guo, Yan Li, Qin Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/postmj/qgaf157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a 5% glucose solution compared to normal saline for treating frozen shoulder via shoulder joint hydraulic distension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 100 participants were randomly assigned to either the 5% glucose group (1 ml compound betamethasone +4 ml 2% lidocaine +15 ml 5% glucose) or the saline group (1 ml compound betamethasone +4 ml 2% lidocaine +15 ml normal saline). Patients were assessed at 1, 4, and 12 weeks post-treatment using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, the Numerical Rating Scale for pain, and active range of motion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Substantial improvements were demonstrated by both treatment groups at all follow-up points (1, 4, and 12 weeks), as reflected by a decrease in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index score. However, the 5% glucose group showed significantly lower Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores than the saline group at 4 and 12 weeks (P = 0.003 and P < 0.05, respectively). This group also experienced significantly greater improvements in shoulder abduction at 4 weeks (P = 0.003) and extension at 12 weeks (P = 0.001) than the saline group. No significant differences were noted between the groups in Numerical Rating Scale scores or shoulder range of motion at other time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with painful frozen shoulder lasting over a month, both treatments resulted in substantial pain relief and improved function. The 5% glucose solution produced more pronounced benefits at 4 and 12 weeks, particularly with regard to pain relief and increased shoulder mobility. Key messages What is already known about this topic: Although extensive research has been conducted on frozen shoulder, the most effective treatment has yet to be identified. What does this study contribute: This is the first study to use a 5% glucose solution as the primary distending agent in shoulder joint hydraulic distension for frozen shoulder (FS), which is a novel approach not previously explored in the literature. How might this study affect research, practice or policy: This study provides a new clinical protocol for the treatment of frozen shoulder.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgaf157\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgaf157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这项前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照研究旨在评估5%葡萄糖溶液与生理盐水相比,通过肩关节液压膨胀治疗肩周炎的有效性。方法:100名受试者随机分为5%葡萄糖组(1 ml复方倍他米松+4 ml 2%利多卡因+15 ml 5%葡萄糖)和生理盐水组(1 ml复方倍他米松+4 ml 2%利多卡因+15 ml生理盐水)。在治疗后1周、4周和12周,使用肩部疼痛和残疾指数、疼痛数值评定量表和活动范围对患者进行评估。结果:两个治疗组在所有随访点(1周、4周和12周)均有显著改善,反映在肩部疼痛和残疾指数评分的降低上。然而,5%葡萄糖组在第4周和第12周的肩部疼痛和残疾指数评分明显低于生理盐水组(P = 0.003和P)。结论:对于持续一个月以上的疼痛性冻疮患者,两种治疗均可显著缓解疼痛并改善功能。5%葡萄糖溶液在第4周和第12周产生了更明显的益处,特别是在疼痛缓解和肩部活动能力增加方面。关于该主题的已知信息:尽管对肩周炎进行了广泛的研究,但最有效的治疗方法尚未确定。这项研究的贡献:这是第一个使用5%葡萄糖溶液作为冻疮肩关节液压膨胀(FS)的主要膨胀剂的研究,这是一种以前没有在文献中探索过的新方法。这项研究如何影响研究、实践或政策:这项研究为治疗肩周炎提供了一个新的临床方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of the efficacy of 5% glucose and saline solution in shoulder joint hydraulic distension for the treatment of frozen shoulder.

Objectives: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a 5% glucose solution compared to normal saline for treating frozen shoulder via shoulder joint hydraulic distension.

Methods: A total of 100 participants were randomly assigned to either the 5% glucose group (1 ml compound betamethasone +4 ml 2% lidocaine +15 ml 5% glucose) or the saline group (1 ml compound betamethasone +4 ml 2% lidocaine +15 ml normal saline). Patients were assessed at 1, 4, and 12 weeks post-treatment using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, the Numerical Rating Scale for pain, and active range of motion.

Results: Substantial improvements were demonstrated by both treatment groups at all follow-up points (1, 4, and 12 weeks), as reflected by a decrease in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index score. However, the 5% glucose group showed significantly lower Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores than the saline group at 4 and 12 weeks (P = 0.003 and P < 0.05, respectively). This group also experienced significantly greater improvements in shoulder abduction at 4 weeks (P = 0.003) and extension at 12 weeks (P = 0.001) than the saline group. No significant differences were noted between the groups in Numerical Rating Scale scores or shoulder range of motion at other time points.

Conclusion: For patients with painful frozen shoulder lasting over a month, both treatments resulted in substantial pain relief and improved function. The 5% glucose solution produced more pronounced benefits at 4 and 12 weeks, particularly with regard to pain relief and increased shoulder mobility. Key messages What is already known about this topic: Although extensive research has been conducted on frozen shoulder, the most effective treatment has yet to be identified. What does this study contribute: This is the first study to use a 5% glucose solution as the primary distending agent in shoulder joint hydraulic distension for frozen shoulder (FS), which is a novel approach not previously explored in the literature. How might this study affect research, practice or policy: This study provides a new clinical protocol for the treatment of frozen shoulder.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Postgraduate Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信