Lorie Gage Richards, Amit Sethi, Maria Paluselli, Steven C Cramer
{"title":"脑卒中或外伤性脑损伤后肌电矫形器的使用:系统回顾。","authors":"Lorie Gage Richards, Amit Sethi, Maria Paluselli, Steven C Cramer","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2025.2553591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Upper extremity (UE) paralysis and weakness due to stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI) can limit independent functioning. Myoelectrically controlled orthoses can be used for compensatory support for activities of daily living (ADL), and for restorative rehabilitation to reduce disability.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigate the use of UE myoelectric orthoses (UE-MEO) for compensatory and/or restorative use after stroke or TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42024577225) from 15 databases including MEDLINE®, Embase®, and APA PsycInfo®. Peer-reviewed reports from 2014 onwards with patient use of UE-MEO after stroke or TBI were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies (11 reports) met the criteria; all included individuals post-stroke and one included a post-TBI subset. The majority were Oxford level of evidence 3b and rated as low risk of bias. All compensatory use studies showed participants could complete more activities or more parts of activities while wearing the UE-MEO. Studies in which the UE-MEO was studied as a restorative therapy took place in outpatient clinics and in the home setting, with mixed results across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that use of a UE-MEO is a viable option as a compensatory tool to improve UE function in individuals with partial paralysis or weakness due to stroke or TBI. Additional evidence is needed to test the utility of a UE-MEO for restorative use and to identify the patient population most likely to derive benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of myoelectric orthosis after stroke or traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Lorie Gage Richards, Amit Sethi, Maria Paluselli, Steven C Cramer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10749357.2025.2553591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Upper extremity (UE) paralysis and weakness due to stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI) can limit independent functioning. Myoelectrically controlled orthoses can be used for compensatory support for activities of daily living (ADL), and for restorative rehabilitation to reduce disability.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigate the use of UE myoelectric orthoses (UE-MEO) for compensatory and/or restorative use after stroke or TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42024577225) from 15 databases including MEDLINE®, Embase®, and APA PsycInfo®. Peer-reviewed reports from 2014 onwards with patient use of UE-MEO after stroke or TBI were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies (11 reports) met the criteria; all included individuals post-stroke and one included a post-TBI subset. The majority were Oxford level of evidence 3b and rated as low risk of bias. All compensatory use studies showed participants could complete more activities or more parts of activities while wearing the UE-MEO. Studies in which the UE-MEO was studied as a restorative therapy took place in outpatient clinics and in the home setting, with mixed results across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that use of a UE-MEO is a viable option as a compensatory tool to improve UE function in individuals with partial paralysis or weakness due to stroke or TBI. Additional evidence is needed to test the utility of a UE-MEO for restorative use and to identify the patient population most likely to derive benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2025.2553591\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2025.2553591","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Use of myoelectric orthosis after stroke or traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.
Background: Upper extremity (UE) paralysis and weakness due to stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI) can limit independent functioning. Myoelectrically controlled orthoses can be used for compensatory support for activities of daily living (ADL), and for restorative rehabilitation to reduce disability.
Objective: We investigate the use of UE myoelectric orthoses (UE-MEO) for compensatory and/or restorative use after stroke or TBI.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42024577225) from 15 databases including MEDLINE®, Embase®, and APA PsycInfo®. Peer-reviewed reports from 2014 onwards with patient use of UE-MEO after stroke or TBI were included.
Results: Ten studies (11 reports) met the criteria; all included individuals post-stroke and one included a post-TBI subset. The majority were Oxford level of evidence 3b and rated as low risk of bias. All compensatory use studies showed participants could complete more activities or more parts of activities while wearing the UE-MEO. Studies in which the UE-MEO was studied as a restorative therapy took place in outpatient clinics and in the home setting, with mixed results across studies.
Conclusion: The results suggest that use of a UE-MEO is a viable option as a compensatory tool to improve UE function in individuals with partial paralysis or weakness due to stroke or TBI. Additional evidence is needed to test the utility of a UE-MEO for restorative use and to identify the patient population most likely to derive benefits.
期刊介绍:
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues.
The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.