从提供者监护中学到的经验:一种用于改善镰状细胞性贫血中风风险筛查的提供者跟踪应用程序。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alyssa M Schlenz, Shannon M Phillips, Judson Stevens, Logan P Williams, Margaret T Lee, Robert Nickel, Beng Fuh, Lily Dolatshahi, Julie Kanter
{"title":"从提供者监护中学到的经验:一种用于改善镰状细胞性贫血中风风险筛查的提供者跟踪应用程序。","authors":"Alyssa M Schlenz, Shannon M Phillips, Judson Stevens, Logan P Williams, Margaret T Lee, Robert Nickel, Beng Fuh, Lily Dolatshahi, Julie Kanter","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>We developed a novel web-based application, Provider Minder, for providers to track and monitor stroke risk screening in children with sickle cell anemia. Here, we describe the development of the application, the process evaluation during implementation, and our lessons learned.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An iterative development process was used to develop the Provider Minder application and its functionalities. For our process evaluation, our team conducted surveys and interviews with study teams across 13 sites that used Provider Minder as part of a multi-intervention trial for the Dissemination and Implementation of Stroke Prevention Looking at the Care Environment study. Surveys and interviews were conducted with providers and coordinators at midpoint (1 year) and end point (2 years). Results were integrated and organized according to themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The process evaluation indicated factors critical for implementation success, such as coordination across stakeholders. Successes of the intervention included high adaptability for unique site needs, ease of use, low costs of implementation, and perceived effectiveness at capturing missed screenings. Key challenges were the time burden for use, redundancy of data capture, and lack of integration, as Provider Minder was distinct from the electronic medical record.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While providers and coordinators described multiple barriers to implementing Provider Minder, results indicated that perceived successes outweighed barriers. Future efforts to reduce the burden associated with health care complexity and improvement in interoperability of electronic medical records will be important for improving the success of similar tracking applications for complex conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons Learned From Provider Minder: A Provider Tracking Application for Improving Stroke Risk Screening in Sickle Cell Anemia.\",\"authors\":\"Alyssa M Schlenz, Shannon M Phillips, Judson Stevens, Logan P Williams, Margaret T Lee, Robert Nickel, Beng Fuh, Lily Dolatshahi, Julie Kanter\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>We developed a novel web-based application, Provider Minder, for providers to track and monitor stroke risk screening in children with sickle cell anemia. Here, we describe the development of the application, the process evaluation during implementation, and our lessons learned.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An iterative development process was used to develop the Provider Minder application and its functionalities. For our process evaluation, our team conducted surveys and interviews with study teams across 13 sites that used Provider Minder as part of a multi-intervention trial for the Dissemination and Implementation of Stroke Prevention Looking at the Care Environment study. Surveys and interviews were conducted with providers and coordinators at midpoint (1 year) and end point (2 years). Results were integrated and organized according to themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The process evaluation indicated factors critical for implementation success, such as coordination across stakeholders. Successes of the intervention included high adaptability for unique site needs, ease of use, low costs of implementation, and perceived effectiveness at capturing missed screenings. Key challenges were the time burden for use, redundancy of data capture, and lack of integration, as Provider Minder was distinct from the electronic medical record.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While providers and coordinators described multiple barriers to implementing Provider Minder, results indicated that perceived successes outweighed barriers. Future efforts to reduce the burden associated with health care complexity and improvement in interoperability of electronic medical records will be important for improving the success of similar tracking applications for complex conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality Management in Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality Management in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000515\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000515","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:我们开发了一种新颖的基于网络的应用程序Provider Minder,供提供者跟踪和监测镰状细胞性贫血儿童卒中风险筛查。在这里,我们将描述应用程序的开发、实现期间的过程评估以及我们学到的经验教训。方法:采用迭代开发过程开发Provider Minder应用程序及其功能。为了我们的过程评估,我们的团队对13个地点的研究团队进行了调查和访谈,这些研究团队使用了Provider Minder作为多干预试验的一部分,以传播和实施卒中预防,观察护理环境研究。在中点(1年)和终点(2年)对提供者和协调员进行了调查和访谈。结果根据主题进行整合和组织。结果:过程评价指出了实施成功的关键因素,如利益相关者之间的协调。该干预措施的成功之处包括对独特场地需求的高适应性、易用性、低实施成本,以及捕获遗漏筛查的感知有效性。主要的挑战是使用的时间负担、数据捕获的冗余以及缺乏集成,因为Provider Minder与电子病历不同。结论:虽然提供者和协调员描述了实施“提供者监护”的多重障碍,但结果表明,感知到的成功大于障碍。今后努力减轻与医疗保健复杂性相关的负担和改进电子医疗记录的互操作性,对于提高复杂情况下类似跟踪应用程序的成功程度将是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lessons Learned From Provider Minder: A Provider Tracking Application for Improving Stroke Risk Screening in Sickle Cell Anemia.

Background and objectives: We developed a novel web-based application, Provider Minder, for providers to track and monitor stroke risk screening in children with sickle cell anemia. Here, we describe the development of the application, the process evaluation during implementation, and our lessons learned.

Methods: An iterative development process was used to develop the Provider Minder application and its functionalities. For our process evaluation, our team conducted surveys and interviews with study teams across 13 sites that used Provider Minder as part of a multi-intervention trial for the Dissemination and Implementation of Stroke Prevention Looking at the Care Environment study. Surveys and interviews were conducted with providers and coordinators at midpoint (1 year) and end point (2 years). Results were integrated and organized according to themes.

Results: The process evaluation indicated factors critical for implementation success, such as coordination across stakeholders. Successes of the intervention included high adaptability for unique site needs, ease of use, low costs of implementation, and perceived effectiveness at capturing missed screenings. Key challenges were the time burden for use, redundancy of data capture, and lack of integration, as Provider Minder was distinct from the electronic medical record.

Conclusions: While providers and coordinators described multiple barriers to implementing Provider Minder, results indicated that perceived successes outweighed barriers. Future efforts to reduce the burden associated with health care complexity and improvement in interoperability of electronic medical records will be important for improving the success of similar tracking applications for complex conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quality Management in Health Care
Quality Management in Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Quality Management in Health Care (QMHC) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for our readers to explore the theoretical, technical, and strategic elements of health care quality management. The journal''s primary focus is on organizational structure and processes as these affect the quality of care and patient outcomes. In particular, it: -Builds knowledge about the application of statistical tools, control charts, benchmarking, and other devices used in the ongoing monitoring and evaluation of care and of patient outcomes; -Encourages research in and evaluation of the results of various organizational strategies designed to bring about quantifiable improvements in patient outcomes; -Fosters the application of quality management science to patient care processes and clinical decision-making; -Fosters cooperation and communication among health care providers, payers and regulators in their efforts to improve the quality of patient outcomes; -Explores links among the various clinical, technical, administrative, and managerial disciplines involved in patient care, as well as the role and responsibilities of organizational governance in ongoing quality management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信