Matheus F P T van Rens, Anita Huis, Kevin Hugill, Robin van der Lee, Willem P de Boode
{"title":"新生儿外周输液相关浸润和外渗的检测:范围综述。","authors":"Matheus F P T van Rens, Anita Huis, Kevin Hugill, Robin van der Lee, Willem P de Boode","doi":"10.1038/s41390-025-04367-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Short peripheral catheter (SPC) use is widespread in neonatal care but is associated with serious complications like infiltration and extravasation. Early recognition and prompt management are essential for improving outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the evidence on SPC infiltration and extravasation complications in neonates, focusing on incidence, risk factors, detection tools, research gaps, and opportunities for standardization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review framework, we systematically searched five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Web of Science) for studies published between January 2000 and May 2024. The search was conducted over a 3-month period (March-May 2024). Studies were included if they focused on SPC-related infiltration or extravasation in neonates in hospital settings. Exclusion criteria included studies on central or arterial lines, non-primary research, or lacking separate neonatal data. Two reviewers independently screened all records using a standardized template.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2879 records were identified, after 820 duplicates and one retracted article were removed, 2058 were left for initial screening. Of these, 1904 were screened in full, and 30 studies met the inclusion criteria. The reported incidence of infiltration and extravasation ranged widely (up to 70%). Risk factors identified included catheter insertion site, technique, and dwell time, and patient characteristics such as low birth weight. Detection was predominantly by subjective visual and tactile assessment, although emerging technologies such as near-infrared spectroscopy and sensor-based tools were explored in some studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SPC-related infiltration and extravasation remain frequent in neonatal care. Despite increasing interest in objective detection tools, their clinical adoption is limited. Standardized definitions and validated early detection methods are essential for improving outcomes and guiding evidence-based practice.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Addressing a critical neonatal concern-peripheral infiltration/extravasation remains a serious concern in neonatal practice, though its definition and incidence vary widely. This review consolidates existing knowledge, emphasizing the lack of standardized definitions and the need for consensus in clinical assessment. Bridging evidence gaps in prevention-few substantive measures are clinically proven to reduce the incidence and severity of SPC-related complications. This review highlights the limitations of current strategies and the potential of emerging technologies, advocating for robust clinical validation. Guiding future research and practice-the findings call for standardized protocols, multicenter trials, and objective detection tools to improve neonatal vascular access management and patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":19829,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of peripheral infusion-related infiltration and extravasation in neonates: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Matheus F P T van Rens, Anita Huis, Kevin Hugill, Robin van der Lee, Willem P de Boode\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41390-025-04367-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Short peripheral catheter (SPC) use is widespread in neonatal care but is associated with serious complications like infiltration and extravasation. Early recognition and prompt management are essential for improving outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the evidence on SPC infiltration and extravasation complications in neonates, focusing on incidence, risk factors, detection tools, research gaps, and opportunities for standardization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review framework, we systematically searched five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Web of Science) for studies published between January 2000 and May 2024. The search was conducted over a 3-month period (March-May 2024). Studies were included if they focused on SPC-related infiltration or extravasation in neonates in hospital settings. Exclusion criteria included studies on central or arterial lines, non-primary research, or lacking separate neonatal data. Two reviewers independently screened all records using a standardized template.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2879 records were identified, after 820 duplicates and one retracted article were removed, 2058 were left for initial screening. Of these, 1904 were screened in full, and 30 studies met the inclusion criteria. The reported incidence of infiltration and extravasation ranged widely (up to 70%). Risk factors identified included catheter insertion site, technique, and dwell time, and patient characteristics such as low birth weight. Detection was predominantly by subjective visual and tactile assessment, although emerging technologies such as near-infrared spectroscopy and sensor-based tools were explored in some studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SPC-related infiltration and extravasation remain frequent in neonatal care. Despite increasing interest in objective detection tools, their clinical adoption is limited. Standardized definitions and validated early detection methods are essential for improving outcomes and guiding evidence-based practice.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Addressing a critical neonatal concern-peripheral infiltration/extravasation remains a serious concern in neonatal practice, though its definition and incidence vary widely. This review consolidates existing knowledge, emphasizing the lack of standardized definitions and the need for consensus in clinical assessment. Bridging evidence gaps in prevention-few substantive measures are clinically proven to reduce the incidence and severity of SPC-related complications. This review highlights the limitations of current strategies and the potential of emerging technologies, advocating for robust clinical validation. Guiding future research and practice-the findings call for standardized protocols, multicenter trials, and objective detection tools to improve neonatal vascular access management and patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04367-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04367-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:短外周导管(SPC)在新生儿护理中广泛使用,但与浸润和外渗等严重并发症相关。早期识别和及时管理对于改善结果至关重要。目的:探讨新生儿SPC浸润和外渗并发症的证据,重点关注发病率、危险因素、检测工具、研究空白和标准化的机会。方法:根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)的范围审查框架,我们系统地检索了5个数据库(PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane和Web of Science),检索了2000年1月至2024年5月期间发表的研究。搜寻工作历时3个月(2024年3月至5月)。如果研究的重点是医院环境中新生儿的spc相关浸润或外渗,则纳入研究。排除标准包括中央或动脉线的研究,非主要研究,或缺乏单独的新生儿资料。两名审稿人使用标准化模板独立筛选所有记录。结果:共识别2879条记录,剔除820篇重复和1篇撤稿后,剩余2058条进行初步筛选。其中,1904项研究被全面筛选,30项研究符合纳入标准。报道的浸润和外渗发生率差别很大(可达70%)。确定的危险因素包括导管插入位置、技术、停留时间和患者特征,如低出生体重。尽管在一些研究中探索了近红外光谱和基于传感器的工具等新兴技术,但检测主要是通过主观的视觉和触觉评估。结论:spc相关的浸润和外渗在新生儿护理中仍然很常见。尽管人们对客观检测工具的兴趣越来越大,但它们的临床应用有限。标准化的定义和经过验证的早期检测方法对于改善结果和指导循证实践至关重要。影响:解决新生儿的一个关键问题-外周浸润/外渗仍然是新生儿实践中的一个严重问题,尽管其定义和发生率差异很大。这篇综述巩固了现有的知识,强调缺乏标准化的定义和在临床评估中需要达成共识。弥合预防方面的证据差距——临床证明,很少有实质性措施可以减少前列腺癌相关并发症的发生率和严重程度。这篇综述强调了当前策略的局限性和新兴技术的潜力,提倡进行强有力的临床验证。指导未来的研究和实践——研究结果呼吁制定标准化方案、多中心试验和客观检测工具,以改善新生儿血管通路管理和患者安全。
Detection of peripheral infusion-related infiltration and extravasation in neonates: a scoping review.
Background: Short peripheral catheter (SPC) use is widespread in neonatal care but is associated with serious complications like infiltration and extravasation. Early recognition and prompt management are essential for improving outcomes.
Objective: To examine the evidence on SPC infiltration and extravasation complications in neonates, focusing on incidence, risk factors, detection tools, research gaps, and opportunities for standardization.
Methods: Following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review framework, we systematically searched five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Web of Science) for studies published between January 2000 and May 2024. The search was conducted over a 3-month period (March-May 2024). Studies were included if they focused on SPC-related infiltration or extravasation in neonates in hospital settings. Exclusion criteria included studies on central or arterial lines, non-primary research, or lacking separate neonatal data. Two reviewers independently screened all records using a standardized template.
Results: 2879 records were identified, after 820 duplicates and one retracted article were removed, 2058 were left for initial screening. Of these, 1904 were screened in full, and 30 studies met the inclusion criteria. The reported incidence of infiltration and extravasation ranged widely (up to 70%). Risk factors identified included catheter insertion site, technique, and dwell time, and patient characteristics such as low birth weight. Detection was predominantly by subjective visual and tactile assessment, although emerging technologies such as near-infrared spectroscopy and sensor-based tools were explored in some studies.
Conclusions: SPC-related infiltration and extravasation remain frequent in neonatal care. Despite increasing interest in objective detection tools, their clinical adoption is limited. Standardized definitions and validated early detection methods are essential for improving outcomes and guiding evidence-based practice.
Impact: Addressing a critical neonatal concern-peripheral infiltration/extravasation remains a serious concern in neonatal practice, though its definition and incidence vary widely. This review consolidates existing knowledge, emphasizing the lack of standardized definitions and the need for consensus in clinical assessment. Bridging evidence gaps in prevention-few substantive measures are clinically proven to reduce the incidence and severity of SPC-related complications. This review highlights the limitations of current strategies and the potential of emerging technologies, advocating for robust clinical validation. Guiding future research and practice-the findings call for standardized protocols, multicenter trials, and objective detection tools to improve neonatal vascular access management and patient safety.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Research publishes original papers, invited reviews, and commentaries on the etiologies of children''s diseases and
disorders of development, extending from molecular biology to epidemiology. Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques
relevant to developmental biology and medicine are acceptable, as are translational human studies