Patrick Hinton, Laura Andrea Rodriguez-Villamizar, Philippe Prince, Tim Prendergast, Minh T Do, Paul A Demers, Cheryl E Peters, Lydia B Zablotska, Paul J Villeneuve
{"title":"加拿大核电厂工人长期暴露于低剂量电离辐射与癌症发病率","authors":"Patrick Hinton, Laura Andrea Rodriguez-Villamizar, Philippe Prince, Tim Prendergast, Minh T Do, Paul A Demers, Cheryl E Peters, Lydia B Zablotska, Paul J Villeneuve","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2025-110257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ionising radiation is a human carcinogen; however, there are uncertainties about the shape of the exposure-response function at low doses. We evaluated the relationship between radiation dose and cancer incidence in a cohort of Canadian nuclear power plant workers (NPPWs) with protracted exposures to low-dose ionising radiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cohort included 75 350 workers employed at one of five Canadian nuclear power plants any time between 1945 and 2010. Exposure to cumulative whole-body effective dose was determined through personal monitoring. A total of 4370 incident cancers were identified through record linkage of these workers to national cancer registries (1969-2010). Vital status was determined through linkages to national mortality and tax databases. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated to compare cancer incidence rates of the cohort with the Canadian general population. Poisson regression was used to characterise dose-response relationships via categorical and linear excess relative risk (ERR) models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly elevated SIRs were found for solid cancers (combined), melanoma, colon and prostate cancer, while a reduced SIR was found for lung cancer. Positive, but not statistically significant excess risks were found for melanoma (ERR/100 mSv=0.32; 95% CI: -0.23 to 0.87) and prostate cancer (ERR/100 mSv=0.12; 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.29). An inverse association was found for lung cancer (ERR/100 mSv=-0.18; 95% CI: -0.01 to -0.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that Canadian NPPWs have increased risks of prostate cancer and melanoma from low-dose ionising radiation exposure. Estimates should be cautiously interpreted due to the inability to adjust for demographic and lifestyle factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":19459,"journal":{"name":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"370-379"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protracted exposure to low-dose ionising radiation and cancer incidence among Canadian nuclear power plant workers.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Hinton, Laura Andrea Rodriguez-Villamizar, Philippe Prince, Tim Prendergast, Minh T Do, Paul A Demers, Cheryl E Peters, Lydia B Zablotska, Paul J Villeneuve\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/oemed-2025-110257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ionising radiation is a human carcinogen; however, there are uncertainties about the shape of the exposure-response function at low doses. We evaluated the relationship between radiation dose and cancer incidence in a cohort of Canadian nuclear power plant workers (NPPWs) with protracted exposures to low-dose ionising radiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cohort included 75 350 workers employed at one of five Canadian nuclear power plants any time between 1945 and 2010. Exposure to cumulative whole-body effective dose was determined through personal monitoring. A total of 4370 incident cancers were identified through record linkage of these workers to national cancer registries (1969-2010). Vital status was determined through linkages to national mortality and tax databases. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated to compare cancer incidence rates of the cohort with the Canadian general population. Poisson regression was used to characterise dose-response relationships via categorical and linear excess relative risk (ERR) models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly elevated SIRs were found for solid cancers (combined), melanoma, colon and prostate cancer, while a reduced SIR was found for lung cancer. Positive, but not statistically significant excess risks were found for melanoma (ERR/100 mSv=0.32; 95% CI: -0.23 to 0.87) and prostate cancer (ERR/100 mSv=0.12; 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.29). An inverse association was found for lung cancer (ERR/100 mSv=-0.18; 95% CI: -0.01 to -0.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that Canadian NPPWs have increased risks of prostate cancer and melanoma from low-dose ionising radiation exposure. Estimates should be cautiously interpreted due to the inability to adjust for demographic and lifestyle factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Occupational and Environmental Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"370-379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Occupational and Environmental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-110257\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2025-110257","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Protracted exposure to low-dose ionising radiation and cancer incidence among Canadian nuclear power plant workers.
Objectives: Ionising radiation is a human carcinogen; however, there are uncertainties about the shape of the exposure-response function at low doses. We evaluated the relationship between radiation dose and cancer incidence in a cohort of Canadian nuclear power plant workers (NPPWs) with protracted exposures to low-dose ionising radiation.
Methods: The cohort included 75 350 workers employed at one of five Canadian nuclear power plants any time between 1945 and 2010. Exposure to cumulative whole-body effective dose was determined through personal monitoring. A total of 4370 incident cancers were identified through record linkage of these workers to national cancer registries (1969-2010). Vital status was determined through linkages to national mortality and tax databases. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated to compare cancer incidence rates of the cohort with the Canadian general population. Poisson regression was used to characterise dose-response relationships via categorical and linear excess relative risk (ERR) models.
Results: Significantly elevated SIRs were found for solid cancers (combined), melanoma, colon and prostate cancer, while a reduced SIR was found for lung cancer. Positive, but not statistically significant excess risks were found for melanoma (ERR/100 mSv=0.32; 95% CI: -0.23 to 0.87) and prostate cancer (ERR/100 mSv=0.12; 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.29). An inverse association was found for lung cancer (ERR/100 mSv=-0.18; 95% CI: -0.01 to -0.36).
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that Canadian NPPWs have increased risks of prostate cancer and melanoma from low-dose ionising radiation exposure. Estimates should be cautiously interpreted due to the inability to adjust for demographic and lifestyle factors.
期刊介绍:
Occupational and Environmental Medicine is an international peer reviewed journal covering current developments in occupational and environmental health worldwide. Occupational and Environmental Medicine publishes high-quality research relating to the full range of chemical, physical, ergonomic, biological and psychosocial hazards in the workplace and to environmental contaminants and their health effects. The journal welcomes research aimed at improving the evidence-based practice of occupational and environmental research; including the development and application of novel biological and statistical techniques in addition to evaluation of interventions in controlling occupational and environmental risks.