肝切除术后抢救失败的危险因素和策略:综述。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jiro Kimura, Kosei Takagi, Tomokazu Fuji, Kazuya Yasui, Takeyoshi Nishiyama, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
{"title":"肝切除术后抢救失败的危险因素和策略:综述。","authors":"Jiro Kimura, Kosei Takagi, Tomokazu Fuji, Kazuya Yasui, Takeyoshi Nishiyama, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as mortality after major postoperative complications, is a crucial indicator of surgical quality. Although mortality rates after hepatectomy have declined owing to improved surgical techniques and perioperative care, FTR remains a major concern. This review synthesizes the current evidence on the risk factors contributing to FTR after hepatectomy and explores multidisciplinary strategies to reduce its rate. Post-hepatectomy liver failure, hemorrhage, bile leakage, and sepsis commonly precede FTR. Risk factors for FTR are multifactorial and include patient-, procedure-, and system-related factors. Higher procedural volumes are associated with lower FTR rates, likely due to better infrastructure, experienced personnel, and access to rapid interventions. Strategies to reduce the FTR rate include preoperative optimization, intraoperative precision, and vigilant postoperative surveillance. System-level approaches, such as multidisciplinary rounds, standardized escalation protocols, and a robust institutional safety culture, are also pivotal. Future innovations, such as predictive analytics, artificial intelligence, and wearable monitoring devices, offer considerable potential for the early detection of complications. Centralization of complex liver surgeries to high-volume centers is recommended to enhance team preparedness. This review emphasizes the importance of adopting a comprehensive, proactive, and technologically integrated approach to reduce the FTR rate after hepatectomy and improve patient survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors and Strategies for Failure to Rescue Following Hepatectomy: A Review.\",\"authors\":\"Jiro Kimura, Kosei Takagi, Tomokazu Fuji, Kazuya Yasui, Takeyoshi Nishiyama, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhbp.70014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as mortality after major postoperative complications, is a crucial indicator of surgical quality. Although mortality rates after hepatectomy have declined owing to improved surgical techniques and perioperative care, FTR remains a major concern. This review synthesizes the current evidence on the risk factors contributing to FTR after hepatectomy and explores multidisciplinary strategies to reduce its rate. Post-hepatectomy liver failure, hemorrhage, bile leakage, and sepsis commonly precede FTR. Risk factors for FTR are multifactorial and include patient-, procedure-, and system-related factors. Higher procedural volumes are associated with lower FTR rates, likely due to better infrastructure, experienced personnel, and access to rapid interventions. Strategies to reduce the FTR rate include preoperative optimization, intraoperative precision, and vigilant postoperative surveillance. System-level approaches, such as multidisciplinary rounds, standardized escalation protocols, and a robust institutional safety culture, are also pivotal. Future innovations, such as predictive analytics, artificial intelligence, and wearable monitoring devices, offer considerable potential for the early detection of complications. Centralization of complex liver surgeries to high-volume centers is recommended to enhance team preparedness. This review emphasizes the importance of adopting a comprehensive, proactive, and technologically integrated approach to reduce the FTR rate after hepatectomy and improve patient survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.70014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.70014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抢救失败(FTR)定义为术后主要并发症后的死亡率,是衡量手术质量的重要指标。尽管由于手术技术和围手术期护理的改进,肝切除术后的死亡率有所下降,但肝术后复发率仍然是一个主要问题。本综述综合了目前肝切除术后发生FTR的危险因素的证据,并探讨了降低其发生率的多学科策略。肝切除术后肝衰竭、出血、胆漏和败血症通常发生在FTR之前。FTR的危险因素是多因素的,包括患者、手术和系统相关因素。较高的手术量与较低的FTR率相关,这可能是由于更好的基础设施、经验丰富的人员和获得快速干预措施的机会。降低FTR率的策略包括术前优化、术中精确和术后警惕监测。系统级方法,如多学科轮次、标准化升级协议和健全的机构安全文化,也至关重要。未来的创新,如预测分析、人工智能和可穿戴监控设备,为早期发现并发症提供了巨大的潜力。建议将复杂的肝脏手术集中到大容量的中心,以加强团队的准备。这篇综述强调了采用全面、主动和技术综合的方法来降低肝切除术后的FTR率和提高患者生存率的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Factors and Strategies for Failure to Rescue Following Hepatectomy: A Review.

Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as mortality after major postoperative complications, is a crucial indicator of surgical quality. Although mortality rates after hepatectomy have declined owing to improved surgical techniques and perioperative care, FTR remains a major concern. This review synthesizes the current evidence on the risk factors contributing to FTR after hepatectomy and explores multidisciplinary strategies to reduce its rate. Post-hepatectomy liver failure, hemorrhage, bile leakage, and sepsis commonly precede FTR. Risk factors for FTR are multifactorial and include patient-, procedure-, and system-related factors. Higher procedural volumes are associated with lower FTR rates, likely due to better infrastructure, experienced personnel, and access to rapid interventions. Strategies to reduce the FTR rate include preoperative optimization, intraoperative precision, and vigilant postoperative surveillance. System-level approaches, such as multidisciplinary rounds, standardized escalation protocols, and a robust institutional safety culture, are also pivotal. Future innovations, such as predictive analytics, artificial intelligence, and wearable monitoring devices, offer considerable potential for the early detection of complications. Centralization of complex liver surgeries to high-volume centers is recommended to enhance team preparedness. This review emphasizes the importance of adopting a comprehensive, proactive, and technologically integrated approach to reduce the FTR rate after hepatectomy and improve patient survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信