Francesco Brucchi, Maria Rennis, Pietro Achilli, Lorenzo Morini, Pietro Carnevali, Matteo Origi, Gianlorenzo Dionigi, Giovanni Ferrari
{"title":"漏斗形补片预防永久性末端结肠造口患者造口旁疝的回顾性评价。","authors":"Francesco Brucchi, Maria Rennis, Pietro Achilli, Lorenzo Morini, Pietro Carnevali, Matteo Origi, Gianlorenzo Dionigi, Giovanni Ferrari","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03481-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parastomal hernia (PSH) is the most common long-term complication after abdominoperineal resection (APR) with permanent end colostomy. Although prophylactic mesh placement has been suggested to reduce the rate of PSH, the optimal mesh type and surgical technique remain unclear. Recently, three-dimensional funnel-shaped meshes have been introduced to stabilize the bowel loop and minimize stoma-related mechanical stress, potentially reducing the incidence of PSH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study, reported in accordance with STROBE guidelines, included consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic permanent end colostomy (PEC) between 2011 and 2019 at a single institution. Patients were assigned to either a group without mesh or a group that received prophylactic intraperitoneal funnel-shaped mesh. The primary endpoint was radiologically confirmed PSH incidence. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to assess differences in cumulative PSH risk over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five patients were included (mesh group: 37; no-mesh group: 38), with a median follow-up of 46 and 43 months, respectively. The mesh group had a lower, but not statistically significant, absolute incidence of PSH (21.6% vs. 39.5%, p = 0.094). Importantly, the Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly lower cumulative incidence of PSH in the mesh group over time (p= 0.033). Postoperative complication rates were comparable between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conusions: </strong>Prophylactic placement of a funnel-shaped mesh during PEC was associated with a reduced cumulative incidence of PSH over long-term followup without increasing surgical morbidity. These results underline the potential benefit of funnel-shaped meshes in PSH prevention and highlight the need for prospective randomized studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"281"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12457522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective evaluation of a funnel-shaped mesh for the prevention of parastomal hernias in patients with permanent end colostomy.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Brucchi, Maria Rennis, Pietro Achilli, Lorenzo Morini, Pietro Carnevali, Matteo Origi, Gianlorenzo Dionigi, Giovanni Ferrari\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10029-025-03481-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parastomal hernia (PSH) is the most common long-term complication after abdominoperineal resection (APR) with permanent end colostomy. Although prophylactic mesh placement has been suggested to reduce the rate of PSH, the optimal mesh type and surgical technique remain unclear. Recently, three-dimensional funnel-shaped meshes have been introduced to stabilize the bowel loop and minimize stoma-related mechanical stress, potentially reducing the incidence of PSH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study, reported in accordance with STROBE guidelines, included consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic permanent end colostomy (PEC) between 2011 and 2019 at a single institution. Patients were assigned to either a group without mesh or a group that received prophylactic intraperitoneal funnel-shaped mesh. The primary endpoint was radiologically confirmed PSH incidence. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to assess differences in cumulative PSH risk over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five patients were included (mesh group: 37; no-mesh group: 38), with a median follow-up of 46 and 43 months, respectively. The mesh group had a lower, but not statistically significant, absolute incidence of PSH (21.6% vs. 39.5%, p = 0.094). Importantly, the Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly lower cumulative incidence of PSH in the mesh group over time (p= 0.033). Postoperative complication rates were comparable between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conusions: </strong>Prophylactic placement of a funnel-shaped mesh during PEC was associated with a reduced cumulative incidence of PSH over long-term followup without increasing surgical morbidity. These results underline the potential benefit of funnel-shaped meshes in PSH prevention and highlight the need for prospective randomized studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hernia\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12457522/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hernia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03481-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03481-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Retrospective evaluation of a funnel-shaped mesh for the prevention of parastomal hernias in patients with permanent end colostomy.
Background: Parastomal hernia (PSH) is the most common long-term complication after abdominoperineal resection (APR) with permanent end colostomy. Although prophylactic mesh placement has been suggested to reduce the rate of PSH, the optimal mesh type and surgical technique remain unclear. Recently, three-dimensional funnel-shaped meshes have been introduced to stabilize the bowel loop and minimize stoma-related mechanical stress, potentially reducing the incidence of PSH.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study, reported in accordance with STROBE guidelines, included consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic permanent end colostomy (PEC) between 2011 and 2019 at a single institution. Patients were assigned to either a group without mesh or a group that received prophylactic intraperitoneal funnel-shaped mesh. The primary endpoint was radiologically confirmed PSH incidence. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to assess differences in cumulative PSH risk over time.
Results: Seventy-five patients were included (mesh group: 37; no-mesh group: 38), with a median follow-up of 46 and 43 months, respectively. The mesh group had a lower, but not statistically significant, absolute incidence of PSH (21.6% vs. 39.5%, p = 0.094). Importantly, the Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly lower cumulative incidence of PSH in the mesh group over time (p= 0.033). Postoperative complication rates were comparable between the groups.
Conusions: Prophylactic placement of a funnel-shaped mesh during PEC was associated with a reduced cumulative incidence of PSH over long-term followup without increasing surgical morbidity. These results underline the potential benefit of funnel-shaped meshes in PSH prevention and highlight the need for prospective randomized studies.
期刊介绍:
Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery.
Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.