Lucie Zdrhova, Petr Bitnar, Lukas Friedl, Jan Mares, Katerina Madle, Karel Balihar, Pavel Kolar, Jana Kozeluhova, Mark Fox, Jan Martinek
{"title":"膈呼吸训练对反流症状患者食管胃交界及食管运动的影响。","authors":"Lucie Zdrhova, Petr Bitnar, Lukas Friedl, Jan Mares, Katerina Madle, Karel Balihar, Pavel Kolar, Jana Kozeluhova, Mark Fox, Jan Martinek","doi":"10.1111/nmo.70172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diaphragmatic breathing training (DBT) improves symptoms in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease; however, the effect of DBT on the anti-reflux barrier and esophageal motility is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the changes in specific parameters of EGJ function and esophageal motility before and after DBT using high-resolution manometry (HRM) in patients with reflux symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively collected data from adult patients with persistent reflux symptoms who underwent initial and follow-up HRM after at least 3 months of DBT were analyzed. Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) function was assessed using basal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure (LESP), the EGJ contractile integral (EGJ-CI), and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). Esophageal motility was assessed using the distal contractile integral (DCI) and percentage of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM).</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Data from 53 patients with a median age of 45 years (range 25-77) were analyzed. LES pressure increased after DBT (mean LES pressure 25.6 [SE 1.3] vs. 29.1 [SE 1.4] mmHg after DBT; p = 0.02). This effect was also observed in patients with an initially hypotensive LES, but no effect was found on the size of hiatus hernia. There was a trend to increased EGJ-CI (mean EGJ-CI 52.8 [SE 3.7] vs. 59.9 [SE 4.3] mmHg·cm after DBT, p = 0.07). Esophageal contractility improved (mean DCI 1046.6 [SE 112] vs. 1264.1 [SE 137] mmHg·s·cm after DBT; p < 0.01) with the prevalence of IEM reduced from 38.0% [SE 5] to 29.2% [SE 4] after DBT; p = 0.03.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and inferences: </strong>Diaphragmatic breathing training increased LES pressure and esophageal peristaltic vigor in patients with reflux symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e70172"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Diaphragmatic Breathing Training on the Esophagogastric Junction and Esophageal Motility in Patients With Reflux Symptoms.\",\"authors\":\"Lucie Zdrhova, Petr Bitnar, Lukas Friedl, Jan Mares, Katerina Madle, Karel Balihar, Pavel Kolar, Jana Kozeluhova, Mark Fox, Jan Martinek\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nmo.70172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diaphragmatic breathing training (DBT) improves symptoms in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease; however, the effect of DBT on the anti-reflux barrier and esophageal motility is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the changes in specific parameters of EGJ function and esophageal motility before and after DBT using high-resolution manometry (HRM) in patients with reflux symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively collected data from adult patients with persistent reflux symptoms who underwent initial and follow-up HRM after at least 3 months of DBT were analyzed. Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) function was assessed using basal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure (LESP), the EGJ contractile integral (EGJ-CI), and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). Esophageal motility was assessed using the distal contractile integral (DCI) and percentage of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM).</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Data from 53 patients with a median age of 45 years (range 25-77) were analyzed. LES pressure increased after DBT (mean LES pressure 25.6 [SE 1.3] vs. 29.1 [SE 1.4] mmHg after DBT; p = 0.02). This effect was also observed in patients with an initially hypotensive LES, but no effect was found on the size of hiatus hernia. There was a trend to increased EGJ-CI (mean EGJ-CI 52.8 [SE 3.7] vs. 59.9 [SE 4.3] mmHg·cm after DBT, p = 0.07). Esophageal contractility improved (mean DCI 1046.6 [SE 112] vs. 1264.1 [SE 137] mmHg·s·cm after DBT; p < 0.01) with the prevalence of IEM reduced from 38.0% [SE 5] to 29.2% [SE 4] after DBT; p = 0.03.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and inferences: </strong>Diaphragmatic breathing training increased LES pressure and esophageal peristaltic vigor in patients with reflux symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70172\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70172","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:膈肌呼吸训练(DBT)可改善胃食管反流病患者的症状;然而,DBT对抗反流屏障和食管运动的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在利用高分辨率测压仪(HRM)评估有反流症状患者行DBT前后EGJ功能和食管运动特定参数的变化。方法:前瞻性地收集有持续反流症状的成年患者的数据,这些患者在DBT治疗至少3个月后接受了初始和随访的HRM。采用食管下括约肌(LES)基础压力(LESP)、食管下括约肌收缩积分(EGJ- ci)和综合松弛压力(IRP)评估食管胃交界(EGJ)功能。采用远端收缩积分(DCI)和无效食管运动百分比(IEM)评估食管运动。主要结果:分析了53例患者的数据,中位年龄为45岁(范围25-77岁)。DBT后LES压升高(DBT后平均LES压25.6 [SE 1.3]比29.1 [SE 1.4] mmHg; p = 0.02)。这种效果在最初低血压的LES患者中也观察到,但对裂孔疝的大小没有影响。DBT后EGJ-CI有升高的趋势(平均EGJ-CI 52.8 [SE 3.7]比59.9 [SE 4.3] mmHg·cm, p = 0.07)。DBT后食管收缩力改善(平均DCI 1046.6 [SE 112] vs. 1264.1 [SE 137] mmHg·s·cm); p结论和推论:膈肌呼吸训练增加反流症状患者的LES压和食管蠕动活力。
Effect of Diaphragmatic Breathing Training on the Esophagogastric Junction and Esophageal Motility in Patients With Reflux Symptoms.
Background: Diaphragmatic breathing training (DBT) improves symptoms in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease; however, the effect of DBT on the anti-reflux barrier and esophageal motility is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the changes in specific parameters of EGJ function and esophageal motility before and after DBT using high-resolution manometry (HRM) in patients with reflux symptoms.
Methods: Prospectively collected data from adult patients with persistent reflux symptoms who underwent initial and follow-up HRM after at least 3 months of DBT were analyzed. Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) function was assessed using basal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure (LESP), the EGJ contractile integral (EGJ-CI), and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). Esophageal motility was assessed using the distal contractile integral (DCI) and percentage of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM).
Key results: Data from 53 patients with a median age of 45 years (range 25-77) were analyzed. LES pressure increased after DBT (mean LES pressure 25.6 [SE 1.3] vs. 29.1 [SE 1.4] mmHg after DBT; p = 0.02). This effect was also observed in patients with an initially hypotensive LES, but no effect was found on the size of hiatus hernia. There was a trend to increased EGJ-CI (mean EGJ-CI 52.8 [SE 3.7] vs. 59.9 [SE 4.3] mmHg·cm after DBT, p = 0.07). Esophageal contractility improved (mean DCI 1046.6 [SE 112] vs. 1264.1 [SE 137] mmHg·s·cm after DBT; p < 0.01) with the prevalence of IEM reduced from 38.0% [SE 5] to 29.2% [SE 4] after DBT; p = 0.03.
Conclusion and inferences: Diaphragmatic breathing training increased LES pressure and esophageal peristaltic vigor in patients with reflux symptoms.
期刊介绍:
Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.