膈呼吸训练对反流症状患者食管胃交界及食管运动的影响。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lucie Zdrhova, Petr Bitnar, Lukas Friedl, Jan Mares, Katerina Madle, Karel Balihar, Pavel Kolar, Jana Kozeluhova, Mark Fox, Jan Martinek
{"title":"膈呼吸训练对反流症状患者食管胃交界及食管运动的影响。","authors":"Lucie Zdrhova, Petr Bitnar, Lukas Friedl, Jan Mares, Katerina Madle, Karel Balihar, Pavel Kolar, Jana Kozeluhova, Mark Fox, Jan Martinek","doi":"10.1111/nmo.70172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diaphragmatic breathing training (DBT) improves symptoms in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease; however, the effect of DBT on the anti-reflux barrier and esophageal motility is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the changes in specific parameters of EGJ function and esophageal motility before and after DBT using high-resolution manometry (HRM) in patients with reflux symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively collected data from adult patients with persistent reflux symptoms who underwent initial and follow-up HRM after at least 3 months of DBT were analyzed. Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) function was assessed using basal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure (LESP), the EGJ contractile integral (EGJ-CI), and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). Esophageal motility was assessed using the distal contractile integral (DCI) and percentage of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM).</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Data from 53 patients with a median age of 45 years (range 25-77) were analyzed. LES pressure increased after DBT (mean LES pressure 25.6 [SE 1.3] vs. 29.1 [SE 1.4] mmHg after DBT; p = 0.02). This effect was also observed in patients with an initially hypotensive LES, but no effect was found on the size of hiatus hernia. There was a trend to increased EGJ-CI (mean EGJ-CI 52.8 [SE 3.7] vs. 59.9 [SE 4.3] mmHg·cm after DBT, p = 0.07). Esophageal contractility improved (mean DCI 1046.6 [SE 112] vs. 1264.1 [SE 137] mmHg·s·cm after DBT; p < 0.01) with the prevalence of IEM reduced from 38.0% [SE 5] to 29.2% [SE 4] after DBT; p = 0.03.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and inferences: </strong>Diaphragmatic breathing training increased LES pressure and esophageal peristaltic vigor in patients with reflux symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e70172"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Diaphragmatic Breathing Training on the Esophagogastric Junction and Esophageal Motility in Patients With Reflux Symptoms.\",\"authors\":\"Lucie Zdrhova, Petr Bitnar, Lukas Friedl, Jan Mares, Katerina Madle, Karel Balihar, Pavel Kolar, Jana Kozeluhova, Mark Fox, Jan Martinek\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nmo.70172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diaphragmatic breathing training (DBT) improves symptoms in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease; however, the effect of DBT on the anti-reflux barrier and esophageal motility is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the changes in specific parameters of EGJ function and esophageal motility before and after DBT using high-resolution manometry (HRM) in patients with reflux symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively collected data from adult patients with persistent reflux symptoms who underwent initial and follow-up HRM after at least 3 months of DBT were analyzed. Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) function was assessed using basal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure (LESP), the EGJ contractile integral (EGJ-CI), and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). Esophageal motility was assessed using the distal contractile integral (DCI) and percentage of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM).</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Data from 53 patients with a median age of 45 years (range 25-77) were analyzed. LES pressure increased after DBT (mean LES pressure 25.6 [SE 1.3] vs. 29.1 [SE 1.4] mmHg after DBT; p = 0.02). This effect was also observed in patients with an initially hypotensive LES, but no effect was found on the size of hiatus hernia. There was a trend to increased EGJ-CI (mean EGJ-CI 52.8 [SE 3.7] vs. 59.9 [SE 4.3] mmHg·cm after DBT, p = 0.07). Esophageal contractility improved (mean DCI 1046.6 [SE 112] vs. 1264.1 [SE 137] mmHg·s·cm after DBT; p < 0.01) with the prevalence of IEM reduced from 38.0% [SE 5] to 29.2% [SE 4] after DBT; p = 0.03.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and inferences: </strong>Diaphragmatic breathing training increased LES pressure and esophageal peristaltic vigor in patients with reflux symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70172\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70172","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:膈肌呼吸训练(DBT)可改善胃食管反流病患者的症状;然而,DBT对抗反流屏障和食管运动的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在利用高分辨率测压仪(HRM)评估有反流症状患者行DBT前后EGJ功能和食管运动特定参数的变化。方法:前瞻性地收集有持续反流症状的成年患者的数据,这些患者在DBT治疗至少3个月后接受了初始和随访的HRM。采用食管下括约肌(LES)基础压力(LESP)、食管下括约肌收缩积分(EGJ- ci)和综合松弛压力(IRP)评估食管胃交界(EGJ)功能。采用远端收缩积分(DCI)和无效食管运动百分比(IEM)评估食管运动。主要结果:分析了53例患者的数据,中位年龄为45岁(范围25-77岁)。DBT后LES压升高(DBT后平均LES压25.6 [SE 1.3]比29.1 [SE 1.4] mmHg; p = 0.02)。这种效果在最初低血压的LES患者中也观察到,但对裂孔疝的大小没有影响。DBT后EGJ-CI有升高的趋势(平均EGJ-CI 52.8 [SE 3.7]比59.9 [SE 4.3] mmHg·cm, p = 0.07)。DBT后食管收缩力改善(平均DCI 1046.6 [SE 112] vs. 1264.1 [SE 137] mmHg·s·cm); p结论和推论:膈肌呼吸训练增加反流症状患者的LES压和食管蠕动活力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Diaphragmatic Breathing Training on the Esophagogastric Junction and Esophageal Motility in Patients With Reflux Symptoms.

Background: Diaphragmatic breathing training (DBT) improves symptoms in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease; however, the effect of DBT on the anti-reflux barrier and esophageal motility is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the changes in specific parameters of EGJ function and esophageal motility before and after DBT using high-resolution manometry (HRM) in patients with reflux symptoms.

Methods: Prospectively collected data from adult patients with persistent reflux symptoms who underwent initial and follow-up HRM after at least 3 months of DBT were analyzed. Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) function was assessed using basal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure (LESP), the EGJ contractile integral (EGJ-CI), and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). Esophageal motility was assessed using the distal contractile integral (DCI) and percentage of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM).

Key results: Data from 53 patients with a median age of 45 years (range 25-77) were analyzed. LES pressure increased after DBT (mean LES pressure 25.6 [SE 1.3] vs. 29.1 [SE 1.4] mmHg after DBT; p = 0.02). This effect was also observed in patients with an initially hypotensive LES, but no effect was found on the size of hiatus hernia. There was a trend to increased EGJ-CI (mean EGJ-CI 52.8 [SE 3.7] vs. 59.9 [SE 4.3] mmHg·cm after DBT, p = 0.07). Esophageal contractility improved (mean DCI 1046.6 [SE 112] vs. 1264.1 [SE 137] mmHg·s·cm after DBT; p < 0.01) with the prevalence of IEM reduced from 38.0% [SE 5] to 29.2% [SE 4] after DBT; p = 0.03.

Conclusion and inferences: Diaphragmatic breathing training increased LES pressure and esophageal peristaltic vigor in patients with reflux symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信