Stacey M. Sklepinski , Yihong Deng , Kavya Sindu Swarna , Jeph Herrin , Eric C. Polley , Joshua J. Neumiller , Rodolfo J. Galindo , Guillermo E. Umpierrez , Joseph S. Ross , Bijan J. Borah , Bradley A. Maron , Mindy M. Mickelson , Rozalina G. McCoy
{"title":"GLP-1受体激动剂对成人2型糖尿病和中度心血管风险患者心血管结局的比较有效性:一项目标试验的模拟","authors":"Stacey M. Sklepinski , Yihong Deng , Kavya Sindu Swarna , Jeph Herrin , Eric C. Polley , Joshua J. Neumiller , Rodolfo J. Galindo , Guillermo E. Umpierrez , Joseph S. Ross , Bijan J. Borah , Bradley A. Maron , Mindy M. Mickelson , Rozalina G. McCoy","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To compare the cardiovascular outcomes of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) at moderate cardiovascular risk.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We emulated a target trial using claims data of adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk who initiated dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, or semaglutide between 01/01/2014–12/31/2021. Random treatment assignment was emulated by propensity scores and incorporated into inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) Cox models. Outcomes were time to composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality), expanded MACE (MACE, hospitalization for heart failure, and revascularization) and its components, and severe hypoglycemia.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After IPTW, 35,572 patients initiated dulaglutide, 4376 initiated exenatide, 8843 initiated liraglutide, and 33,063 initiated semaglutide. Compared to dulaglutide, semaglutide was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR 0.85, 95CI % 0.78–0.93), expanded MACE (HR 0.92, 95CI % 0.87–0.96), all-cause mortality (HR 0.81, 95CI % 0.71–0.92), stroke (HR 0.82, 95CI % 0.70–0.97), and revascularization (HR 0.93, 95CI % 0.88–0.99), while liraglutide was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR 0.84, 95CI % 0.72–0.97) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.79, 95CI % 0.64–0.99).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Among GLP-1RAs, semaglutide and liraglutide were associated with the greatest cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 112910"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular outcomes among adults with type 2 diabetes and moderate cardiovascular risk: emulation of a target trial\",\"authors\":\"Stacey M. Sklepinski , Yihong Deng , Kavya Sindu Swarna , Jeph Herrin , Eric C. Polley , Joshua J. Neumiller , Rodolfo J. Galindo , Guillermo E. Umpierrez , Joseph S. Ross , Bijan J. Borah , Bradley A. Maron , Mindy M. Mickelson , Rozalina G. McCoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To compare the cardiovascular outcomes of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) at moderate cardiovascular risk.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We emulated a target trial using claims data of adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk who initiated dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, or semaglutide between 01/01/2014–12/31/2021. Random treatment assignment was emulated by propensity scores and incorporated into inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) Cox models. Outcomes were time to composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality), expanded MACE (MACE, hospitalization for heart failure, and revascularization) and its components, and severe hypoglycemia.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After IPTW, 35,572 patients initiated dulaglutide, 4376 initiated exenatide, 8843 initiated liraglutide, and 33,063 initiated semaglutide. Compared to dulaglutide, semaglutide was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR 0.85, 95CI % 0.78–0.93), expanded MACE (HR 0.92, 95CI % 0.87–0.96), all-cause mortality (HR 0.81, 95CI % 0.71–0.92), stroke (HR 0.82, 95CI % 0.70–0.97), and revascularization (HR 0.93, 95CI % 0.88–0.99), while liraglutide was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR 0.84, 95CI % 0.72–0.97) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.79, 95CI % 0.64–0.99).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Among GLP-1RAs, semaglutide and liraglutide were associated with the greatest cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes research and clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"229 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112910\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes research and clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822725009246\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822725009246","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular outcomes among adults with type 2 diabetes and moderate cardiovascular risk: emulation of a target trial
Aim
To compare the cardiovascular outcomes of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) at moderate cardiovascular risk.
Methods
We emulated a target trial using claims data of adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk who initiated dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, or semaglutide between 01/01/2014–12/31/2021. Random treatment assignment was emulated by propensity scores and incorporated into inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) Cox models. Outcomes were time to composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality), expanded MACE (MACE, hospitalization for heart failure, and revascularization) and its components, and severe hypoglycemia.
Results
After IPTW, 35,572 patients initiated dulaglutide, 4376 initiated exenatide, 8843 initiated liraglutide, and 33,063 initiated semaglutide. Compared to dulaglutide, semaglutide was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR 0.85, 95CI % 0.78–0.93), expanded MACE (HR 0.92, 95CI % 0.87–0.96), all-cause mortality (HR 0.81, 95CI % 0.71–0.92), stroke (HR 0.82, 95CI % 0.70–0.97), and revascularization (HR 0.93, 95CI % 0.88–0.99), while liraglutide was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR 0.84, 95CI % 0.72–0.97) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.79, 95CI % 0.64–0.99).
Conclusions
Among GLP-1RAs, semaglutide and liraglutide were associated with the greatest cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.