加速度计测量的身体活动时间和发生心房颤动的风险:英国生物银行队列研究。

IF 7.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Qingling Zhang, Luoxuan Fu, Jinhua Zhao, Kangyin Chen, Gary Tse, Gregory Y H Lip, Tong Liu
{"title":"加速度计测量的身体活动时间和发生心房颤动的风险:英国生物银行队列研究。","authors":"Qingling Zhang, Luoxuan Fu, Jinhua Zhao, Kangyin Chen, Gary Tse, Gregory Y H Lip, Tong Liu","doi":"10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) is linked to a lower risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), the influence of its timing on AF outcomes remains largely understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Accelerometer-derived MVPA data from UK Biobank participants free of AF at baseline were used to examine associations between distinct MVPA timing patterns (inactive, morning, afternoon, evening, mixed) and incident AF risk, estimated via multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 88,024 participants (57.4% female) were followed for a median of 7.87 years, during which 3,815 developed incident AF. In the fully adjusted Cox model, engaging in MVPA in the morning, afternoon, or at mixed times was associated with lower AF risk, compared with inactivity. The morning activity group showed the greatest risk reduction (HR = 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.89; p < 0.001). Stratified analyses revealed that adults < 65 years benefited most from morning exercise. For diabetics, morning and afternoon MVPA were protective (HR 0.66, p = 0.001; HR 0.77, p = 0.025). Among non-diabetics, evening activity offered the greatest benefit (HR 0.76, p = 0.029). In non-hypertensive individuals, the timing of activity made little difference. However, among patients with hypertension, engaging in activity at any time of day was associated with a reduced risk of atrial fibrillation, with the greatest benefit observed in the morning (HR = 0.74, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regular MVPA at any time was associated with lower AF risk, with exploratory evidence suggesting greater benefit in the morning, particularly among younger adults and those with comorbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12051,"journal":{"name":"European journal of preventive cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity Timing and Risk of Incident Atrial Fibrillation: A UK Biobank Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Qingling Zhang, Luoxuan Fu, Jinhua Zhao, Kangyin Chen, Gary Tse, Gregory Y H Lip, Tong Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) is linked to a lower risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), the influence of its timing on AF outcomes remains largely understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Accelerometer-derived MVPA data from UK Biobank participants free of AF at baseline were used to examine associations between distinct MVPA timing patterns (inactive, morning, afternoon, evening, mixed) and incident AF risk, estimated via multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 88,024 participants (57.4% female) were followed for a median of 7.87 years, during which 3,815 developed incident AF. In the fully adjusted Cox model, engaging in MVPA in the morning, afternoon, or at mixed times was associated with lower AF risk, compared with inactivity. The morning activity group showed the greatest risk reduction (HR = 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.89; p < 0.001). Stratified analyses revealed that adults < 65 years benefited most from morning exercise. For diabetics, morning and afternoon MVPA were protective (HR 0.66, p = 0.001; HR 0.77, p = 0.025). Among non-diabetics, evening activity offered the greatest benefit (HR 0.76, p = 0.029). In non-hypertensive individuals, the timing of activity made little difference. However, among patients with hypertension, engaging in activity at any time of day was associated with a reduced risk of atrial fibrillation, with the greatest benefit observed in the morning (HR = 0.74, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regular MVPA at any time was associated with lower AF risk, with exploratory evidence suggesting greater benefit in the morning, particularly among younger adults and those with comorbidities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf604\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf604","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然中等到剧烈的体育活动(MVPA)与较低的房颤(AF)风险有关,但其时间对房颤结果的影响在很大程度上仍未得到充分研究。方法:使用英国生物银行(UK Biobank)无房颤参与者的加速度计得出的MVPA数据,检查不同MVPA时间模式(不活动、上午、下午、晚上、混合)与房颤风险之间的关系,通过多变量调整的Cox比例风险模型进行估计。结果:共有88,024名参与者(57.4%为女性)接受了中位7.87年的随访,在此期间,3,815人发生了AF。在完全调整的Cox模型中,与不运动相比,在上午、下午或混合时间进行MVPA与较低的AF风险相关。晨练组的风险降低幅度最大(HR = 0.79; 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.70-0.89; p < 0.001)。分层分析显示,65岁以下的成年人从晨练中获益最多。对于糖尿病患者,上午和下午的MVPA具有保护作用(HR 0.66, p = 0.001; HR 0.77, p = 0.025)。在非糖尿病患者中,晚间活动提供了最大的益处(HR 0.76, p = 0.029)。在非高血压个体中,运动的时间差别不大。然而,在高血压患者中,在一天中的任何时间进行活动都与房颤风险降低相关,在早晨观察到的益处最大(HR = 0.74, p < 0.001)。结论:任何时间的定期MVPA与较低的房颤风险相关,探索性证据表明,早晨进行MVPA获益更大,尤其是在年轻人和有合并症的人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity Timing and Risk of Incident Atrial Fibrillation: A UK Biobank Cohort Study.

Introduction: Although moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) is linked to a lower risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), the influence of its timing on AF outcomes remains largely understudied.

Methods: Accelerometer-derived MVPA data from UK Biobank participants free of AF at baseline were used to examine associations between distinct MVPA timing patterns (inactive, morning, afternoon, evening, mixed) and incident AF risk, estimated via multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: A total of 88,024 participants (57.4% female) were followed for a median of 7.87 years, during which 3,815 developed incident AF. In the fully adjusted Cox model, engaging in MVPA in the morning, afternoon, or at mixed times was associated with lower AF risk, compared with inactivity. The morning activity group showed the greatest risk reduction (HR = 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.89; p < 0.001). Stratified analyses revealed that adults < 65 years benefited most from morning exercise. For diabetics, morning and afternoon MVPA were protective (HR 0.66, p = 0.001; HR 0.77, p = 0.025). Among non-diabetics, evening activity offered the greatest benefit (HR 0.76, p = 0.029). In non-hypertensive individuals, the timing of activity made little difference. However, among patients with hypertension, engaging in activity at any time of day was associated with a reduced risk of atrial fibrillation, with the greatest benefit observed in the morning (HR = 0.74, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Regular MVPA at any time was associated with lower AF risk, with exploratory evidence suggesting greater benefit in the morning, particularly among younger adults and those with comorbidities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of preventive cardiology
European journal of preventive cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (EJPC) is an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). The journal covers a wide range of scientific, clinical, and public health disciplines related to cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor management, cardiovascular rehabilitation, population science and public health, and exercise physiology. The categories covered by the journal include classical risk factors and treatment, lifestyle risk factors, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular conditions, concomitant pathological conditions, sport cardiology, diagnostic tests, care settings, epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacotherapy, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信