{"title":"耐甲氧西林与敏感甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌对消毒剂敏感性比较。","authors":"Ryan Karcher , Lisa S. Smith , Vipin K. Rastogi","doi":"10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cells of a Methicillin-resistant strain of <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (MRSA, ATCC 33592) were compared with a Methicillin-sensitive strain of <em>S. aureus</em> (ATCC 6358) for sensitivity to three different disinfectant active ingredient classes using the quantitative method (QM). The disinfectant active ingredient classes included reagent grade hydrogen peroxide, quaternary ammonium compound (QAC), and reagent grade sodium hypochlorite. Cells of both strains were grown in broth culture, mixed with a 3-part soil load [mucin, Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) and yeast extract], dried briefly on small stainless-steel carriers, and exposed to different dosages of disinfectant classes, corresponding to low, intermediate, and high efficacy treatments. Results show consistent cell recovery from both strains in the range of 5.5–6.0-Log<sub>10</sub> of bacteria per carrier from control sets assessed on nine separate test days. Efficacy results measured as mean log reduction (LR) values show comparable sensitivity of the MRSA strain relative to the Methicillin-sensitive strain to the low treatment of all three disinfectant classes. The MRSA strain displayed enhanced sensitivity (an increase in LR of 1.5–2.0) to the three disinfectant classes at the intermediate treatment level relative to the Methicillin-sensitive strain. Interestingly, while the MRSA strain displayed higher sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide by 2-Log<sub>10</sub> relative to the Methicillin-sensitive strain at the high treatment level, the two strains displayed comparable sensitivity to high treatment levels of the other two disinfectant classes, i.e., sodium hypochlorite and QAC. Taken together, the results show comparable to enhanced sensitivity of the MRSA cells compared to Methicillin-sensitive cells to reagent grade hydrogen peroxide, QAC, and sodium hypochlorite. The results support the contention that antibiotic resistance in <em>S. aureus</em> is <em>not</em> correlated with higher resistance to these three classes of disinfectants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microbiological methods","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 107275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative disinfectant sensitivity of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus cells\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Karcher , Lisa S. Smith , Vipin K. Rastogi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cells of a Methicillin-resistant strain of <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (MRSA, ATCC 33592) were compared with a Methicillin-sensitive strain of <em>S. aureus</em> (ATCC 6358) for sensitivity to three different disinfectant active ingredient classes using the quantitative method (QM). The disinfectant active ingredient classes included reagent grade hydrogen peroxide, quaternary ammonium compound (QAC), and reagent grade sodium hypochlorite. Cells of both strains were grown in broth culture, mixed with a 3-part soil load [mucin, Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) and yeast extract], dried briefly on small stainless-steel carriers, and exposed to different dosages of disinfectant classes, corresponding to low, intermediate, and high efficacy treatments. Results show consistent cell recovery from both strains in the range of 5.5–6.0-Log<sub>10</sub> of bacteria per carrier from control sets assessed on nine separate test days. Efficacy results measured as mean log reduction (LR) values show comparable sensitivity of the MRSA strain relative to the Methicillin-sensitive strain to the low treatment of all three disinfectant classes. The MRSA strain displayed enhanced sensitivity (an increase in LR of 1.5–2.0) to the three disinfectant classes at the intermediate treatment level relative to the Methicillin-sensitive strain. Interestingly, while the MRSA strain displayed higher sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide by 2-Log<sub>10</sub> relative to the Methicillin-sensitive strain at the high treatment level, the two strains displayed comparable sensitivity to high treatment levels of the other two disinfectant classes, i.e., sodium hypochlorite and QAC. Taken together, the results show comparable to enhanced sensitivity of the MRSA cells compared to Methicillin-sensitive cells to reagent grade hydrogen peroxide, QAC, and sodium hypochlorite. The results support the contention that antibiotic resistance in <em>S. aureus</em> is <em>not</em> correlated with higher resistance to these three classes of disinfectants.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of microbiological methods\",\"volume\":\"238 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of microbiological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167701225001915\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microbiological methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167701225001915","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative disinfectant sensitivity of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus cells
Cells of a Methicillin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, ATCC 33592) were compared with a Methicillin-sensitive strain of S. aureus (ATCC 6358) for sensitivity to three different disinfectant active ingredient classes using the quantitative method (QM). The disinfectant active ingredient classes included reagent grade hydrogen peroxide, quaternary ammonium compound (QAC), and reagent grade sodium hypochlorite. Cells of both strains were grown in broth culture, mixed with a 3-part soil load [mucin, Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) and yeast extract], dried briefly on small stainless-steel carriers, and exposed to different dosages of disinfectant classes, corresponding to low, intermediate, and high efficacy treatments. Results show consistent cell recovery from both strains in the range of 5.5–6.0-Log10 of bacteria per carrier from control sets assessed on nine separate test days. Efficacy results measured as mean log reduction (LR) values show comparable sensitivity of the MRSA strain relative to the Methicillin-sensitive strain to the low treatment of all three disinfectant classes. The MRSA strain displayed enhanced sensitivity (an increase in LR of 1.5–2.0) to the three disinfectant classes at the intermediate treatment level relative to the Methicillin-sensitive strain. Interestingly, while the MRSA strain displayed higher sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide by 2-Log10 relative to the Methicillin-sensitive strain at the high treatment level, the two strains displayed comparable sensitivity to high treatment levels of the other two disinfectant classes, i.e., sodium hypochlorite and QAC. Taken together, the results show comparable to enhanced sensitivity of the MRSA cells compared to Methicillin-sensitive cells to reagent grade hydrogen peroxide, QAC, and sodium hypochlorite. The results support the contention that antibiotic resistance in S. aureus is not correlated with higher resistance to these three classes of disinfectants.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Microbiological Methods publishes scholarly and original articles, notes and review articles. These articles must include novel and/or state-of-the-art methods, or significant improvements to existing methods. Novel and innovative applications of current methods that are validated and useful will also be published. JMM strives for scholarship, innovation and excellence. This demands scientific rigour, the best available methods and technologies, correctly replicated experiments/tests, the inclusion of proper controls, calibrations, and the correct statistical analysis. The presentation of the data must support the interpretation of the method/approach.
All aspects of microbiology are covered, except virology. These include agricultural microbiology, applied and environmental microbiology, bioassays, bioinformatics, biotechnology, biochemical microbiology, clinical microbiology, diagnostics, food monitoring and quality control microbiology, microbial genetics and genomics, geomicrobiology, microbiome methods regardless of habitat, high through-put sequencing methods and analysis, microbial pathogenesis and host responses, metabolomics, metagenomics, metaproteomics, microbial ecology and diversity, microbial physiology, microbial ultra-structure, microscopic and imaging methods, molecular microbiology, mycology, novel mathematical microbiology and modelling, parasitology, plant-microbe interactions, protein markers/profiles, proteomics, pyrosequencing, public health microbiology, radioisotopes applied to microbiology, robotics applied to microbiological methods,rumen microbiology, microbiological methods for space missions and extreme environments, sampling methods and samplers, soil and sediment microbiology, transcriptomics, veterinary microbiology, sero-diagnostics and typing/identification.