耐甲氧西林与敏感甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌对消毒剂敏感性比较。

IF 1.9 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Ryan Karcher , Lisa S. Smith , Vipin K. Rastogi
{"title":"耐甲氧西林与敏感甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌对消毒剂敏感性比较。","authors":"Ryan Karcher ,&nbsp;Lisa S. Smith ,&nbsp;Vipin K. Rastogi","doi":"10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cells of a Methicillin-resistant strain of <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (MRSA, ATCC 33592) were compared with a Methicillin-sensitive strain of <em>S. aureus</em> (ATCC 6358) for sensitivity to three different disinfectant active ingredient classes using the quantitative method (QM). The disinfectant active ingredient classes included reagent grade hydrogen peroxide, quaternary ammonium compound (QAC), and reagent grade sodium hypochlorite. Cells of both strains were grown in broth culture, mixed with a 3-part soil load [mucin, Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) and yeast extract], dried briefly on small stainless-steel carriers, and exposed to different dosages of disinfectant classes, corresponding to low, intermediate, and high efficacy treatments. Results show consistent cell recovery from both strains in the range of 5.5–6.0-Log<sub>10</sub> of bacteria per carrier from control sets assessed on nine separate test days. Efficacy results measured as mean log reduction (LR) values show comparable sensitivity of the MRSA strain relative to the Methicillin-sensitive strain to the low treatment of all three disinfectant classes. The MRSA strain displayed enhanced sensitivity (an increase in LR of 1.5–2.0) to the three disinfectant classes at the intermediate treatment level relative to the Methicillin-sensitive strain. Interestingly, while the MRSA strain displayed higher sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide by 2-Log<sub>10</sub> relative to the Methicillin-sensitive strain at the high treatment level, the two strains displayed comparable sensitivity to high treatment levels of the other two disinfectant classes, i.e., sodium hypochlorite and QAC. Taken together, the results show comparable to enhanced sensitivity of the MRSA cells compared to Methicillin-sensitive cells to reagent grade hydrogen peroxide, QAC, and sodium hypochlorite. The results support the contention that antibiotic resistance in <em>S. aureus</em> is <em>not</em> correlated with higher resistance to these three classes of disinfectants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microbiological methods","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 107275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative disinfectant sensitivity of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus cells\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Karcher ,&nbsp;Lisa S. Smith ,&nbsp;Vipin K. Rastogi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cells of a Methicillin-resistant strain of <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (MRSA, ATCC 33592) were compared with a Methicillin-sensitive strain of <em>S. aureus</em> (ATCC 6358) for sensitivity to three different disinfectant active ingredient classes using the quantitative method (QM). The disinfectant active ingredient classes included reagent grade hydrogen peroxide, quaternary ammonium compound (QAC), and reagent grade sodium hypochlorite. Cells of both strains were grown in broth culture, mixed with a 3-part soil load [mucin, Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) and yeast extract], dried briefly on small stainless-steel carriers, and exposed to different dosages of disinfectant classes, corresponding to low, intermediate, and high efficacy treatments. Results show consistent cell recovery from both strains in the range of 5.5–6.0-Log<sub>10</sub> of bacteria per carrier from control sets assessed on nine separate test days. Efficacy results measured as mean log reduction (LR) values show comparable sensitivity of the MRSA strain relative to the Methicillin-sensitive strain to the low treatment of all three disinfectant classes. The MRSA strain displayed enhanced sensitivity (an increase in LR of 1.5–2.0) to the three disinfectant classes at the intermediate treatment level relative to the Methicillin-sensitive strain. Interestingly, while the MRSA strain displayed higher sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide by 2-Log<sub>10</sub> relative to the Methicillin-sensitive strain at the high treatment level, the two strains displayed comparable sensitivity to high treatment levels of the other two disinfectant classes, i.e., sodium hypochlorite and QAC. Taken together, the results show comparable to enhanced sensitivity of the MRSA cells compared to Methicillin-sensitive cells to reagent grade hydrogen peroxide, QAC, and sodium hypochlorite. The results support the contention that antibiotic resistance in <em>S. aureus</em> is <em>not</em> correlated with higher resistance to these three classes of disinfectants.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of microbiological methods\",\"volume\":\"238 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of microbiological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167701225001915\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microbiological methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167701225001915","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用定量方法(QM)比较了耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA, ATCC 33592)与耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(ATCC 6358)对3种不同消毒剂活性成分类别的敏感性。消毒剂有效成分类别包括试剂级过氧化氢、季铵化合物(QAC)和试剂级次氯酸钠。两种菌株的细胞在肉汤培养中生长,与三组分土壤负荷[粘蛋白,牛血清白蛋白(BSA)和酵母提取物]混合,在小型不锈钢载体上短暂干燥,并暴露于不同剂量的消毒剂类别,对应于低,中,高效的处理。结果显示,在9个单独的测试天内,两种菌株的细胞回收率一致,在每个载体5.5-6.0 log10的范围内。以平均对数降低(LR)值测量的功效结果显示,相对于甲氧西林敏感菌株,MRSA菌株对所有三种消毒剂的低处理具有相当的敏感性。与甲氧西林敏感菌株相比,MRSA菌株在中等处理水平下对三种消毒剂的敏感性增强(LR增加1.5-2.0)。有趣的是,虽然MRSA菌株在高处理水平下对过氧化氢的敏感性比甲氧西林敏感菌株高2-Log10,但这两种菌株对其他两种消毒剂(次氯酸钠和QAC)的敏感性相当。综上所述,结果表明与甲氧西林敏感细胞相比,MRSA细胞对试剂级过氧化氢、QAC和次氯酸钠的敏感性增强。结果支持了金黄色葡萄球菌的抗生素耐药性与对这三类消毒剂的高耐药性无关的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative disinfectant sensitivity of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus cells
Cells of a Methicillin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, ATCC 33592) were compared with a Methicillin-sensitive strain of S. aureus (ATCC 6358) for sensitivity to three different disinfectant active ingredient classes using the quantitative method (QM). The disinfectant active ingredient classes included reagent grade hydrogen peroxide, quaternary ammonium compound (QAC), and reagent grade sodium hypochlorite. Cells of both strains were grown in broth culture, mixed with a 3-part soil load [mucin, Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) and yeast extract], dried briefly on small stainless-steel carriers, and exposed to different dosages of disinfectant classes, corresponding to low, intermediate, and high efficacy treatments. Results show consistent cell recovery from both strains in the range of 5.5–6.0-Log10 of bacteria per carrier from control sets assessed on nine separate test days. Efficacy results measured as mean log reduction (LR) values show comparable sensitivity of the MRSA strain relative to the Methicillin-sensitive strain to the low treatment of all three disinfectant classes. The MRSA strain displayed enhanced sensitivity (an increase in LR of 1.5–2.0) to the three disinfectant classes at the intermediate treatment level relative to the Methicillin-sensitive strain. Interestingly, while the MRSA strain displayed higher sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide by 2-Log10 relative to the Methicillin-sensitive strain at the high treatment level, the two strains displayed comparable sensitivity to high treatment levels of the other two disinfectant classes, i.e., sodium hypochlorite and QAC. Taken together, the results show comparable to enhanced sensitivity of the MRSA cells compared to Methicillin-sensitive cells to reagent grade hydrogen peroxide, QAC, and sodium hypochlorite. The results support the contention that antibiotic resistance in S. aureus is not correlated with higher resistance to these three classes of disinfectants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of microbiological methods
Journal of microbiological methods 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
151
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Microbiological Methods publishes scholarly and original articles, notes and review articles. These articles must include novel and/or state-of-the-art methods, or significant improvements to existing methods. Novel and innovative applications of current methods that are validated and useful will also be published. JMM strives for scholarship, innovation and excellence. This demands scientific rigour, the best available methods and technologies, correctly replicated experiments/tests, the inclusion of proper controls, calibrations, and the correct statistical analysis. The presentation of the data must support the interpretation of the method/approach. All aspects of microbiology are covered, except virology. These include agricultural microbiology, applied and environmental microbiology, bioassays, bioinformatics, biotechnology, biochemical microbiology, clinical microbiology, diagnostics, food monitoring and quality control microbiology, microbial genetics and genomics, geomicrobiology, microbiome methods regardless of habitat, high through-put sequencing methods and analysis, microbial pathogenesis and host responses, metabolomics, metagenomics, metaproteomics, microbial ecology and diversity, microbial physiology, microbial ultra-structure, microscopic and imaging methods, molecular microbiology, mycology, novel mathematical microbiology and modelling, parasitology, plant-microbe interactions, protein markers/profiles, proteomics, pyrosequencing, public health microbiology, radioisotopes applied to microbiology, robotics applied to microbiological methods,rumen microbiology, microbiological methods for space missions and extreme environments, sampling methods and samplers, soil and sediment microbiology, transcriptomics, veterinary microbiology, sero-diagnostics and typing/identification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信