Amy Finlay, Andrew Jones, Paula Thorp, I Gusti Ngurah Edi Putra, Megan Polden, Jean Adams, Jane Brealey, Eric Robinson
{"title":"2024年期间英国户外食品行业菜单卡路里标签的准确性:国家食品政策的评估。","authors":"Amy Finlay, Andrew Jones, Paula Thorp, I Gusti Ngurah Edi Putra, Megan Polden, Jean Adams, Jane Brealey, Eric Robinson","doi":"10.1017/S0007114525105217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mandatory calorie labelling was introduced in out-of-home (OOH) food sector outlets during 2022 in England. Previous research in North America has found that labelled energy content can be underestimated for packaged and quick-serve foods, but no study has evaluated the accuracy of OOH food sector menu calorie labelling in response to the mandatory policy introduced in England. <i>N</i> 295 menu items from a range of outlet types (e.g. cafes, pubs, restaurants) and menu categories (e.g. starters and sides, main, dessert) were sampled. Bomb calorimetry was used to quantify energy content, and the reported energy content on menus was recorded. Consistency of measured energy was assessed by sampling the same items across outlets of the same business (<i>n</i> 50 menu items). Differences between reported and measured energy content were tested through Wilcoxon signed rank tests, and a linear model examined correlates of the difference. Mean measured kilocalories (kcal) were significantly lower than reported kcal (-16·70 kcal (±149·19), <i>V</i> = 16 920, <i>P</i> < 0·01 and <i>r</i> = 0·182). However, both over- (23 % of menu items) and under-estimation (11 %) by > 20 % of measured energy content were common, and the averaged absolute percentage difference between reported and measured values was 21 % (±29 %). Discrepancy between measured and reported energy content was more common in some outlet types (pubs), and reported energy content was substantially different (> 20 %) to measured energy content for 35 % of sampled menu items. There may be significant inaccuracies in reported energy content of calorie labelled menu items in English food outlets subject to mandatory calorie labelling.</p>","PeriodicalId":9257,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of menu calorie labelling in the England out-of-home food sector during 2024: assessment of a national food policy.\",\"authors\":\"Amy Finlay, Andrew Jones, Paula Thorp, I Gusti Ngurah Edi Putra, Megan Polden, Jean Adams, Jane Brealey, Eric Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0007114525105217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mandatory calorie labelling was introduced in out-of-home (OOH) food sector outlets during 2022 in England. Previous research in North America has found that labelled energy content can be underestimated for packaged and quick-serve foods, but no study has evaluated the accuracy of OOH food sector menu calorie labelling in response to the mandatory policy introduced in England. <i>N</i> 295 menu items from a range of outlet types (e.g. cafes, pubs, restaurants) and menu categories (e.g. starters and sides, main, dessert) were sampled. Bomb calorimetry was used to quantify energy content, and the reported energy content on menus was recorded. Consistency of measured energy was assessed by sampling the same items across outlets of the same business (<i>n</i> 50 menu items). Differences between reported and measured energy content were tested through Wilcoxon signed rank tests, and a linear model examined correlates of the difference. Mean measured kilocalories (kcal) were significantly lower than reported kcal (-16·70 kcal (±149·19), <i>V</i> = 16 920, <i>P</i> < 0·01 and <i>r</i> = 0·182). However, both over- (23 % of menu items) and under-estimation (11 %) by > 20 % of measured energy content were common, and the averaged absolute percentage difference between reported and measured values was 21 % (±29 %). Discrepancy between measured and reported energy content was more common in some outlet types (pubs), and reported energy content was substantially different (> 20 %) to measured energy content for 35 % of sampled menu items. There may be significant inaccuracies in reported energy content of calorie labelled menu items in English food outlets subject to mandatory calorie labelling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114525105217\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114525105217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accuracy of menu calorie labelling in the England out-of-home food sector during 2024: assessment of a national food policy.
Mandatory calorie labelling was introduced in out-of-home (OOH) food sector outlets during 2022 in England. Previous research in North America has found that labelled energy content can be underestimated for packaged and quick-serve foods, but no study has evaluated the accuracy of OOH food sector menu calorie labelling in response to the mandatory policy introduced in England. N 295 menu items from a range of outlet types (e.g. cafes, pubs, restaurants) and menu categories (e.g. starters and sides, main, dessert) were sampled. Bomb calorimetry was used to quantify energy content, and the reported energy content on menus was recorded. Consistency of measured energy was assessed by sampling the same items across outlets of the same business (n 50 menu items). Differences between reported and measured energy content were tested through Wilcoxon signed rank tests, and a linear model examined correlates of the difference. Mean measured kilocalories (kcal) were significantly lower than reported kcal (-16·70 kcal (±149·19), V = 16 920, P < 0·01 and r = 0·182). However, both over- (23 % of menu items) and under-estimation (11 %) by > 20 % of measured energy content were common, and the averaged absolute percentage difference between reported and measured values was 21 % (±29 %). Discrepancy between measured and reported energy content was more common in some outlet types (pubs), and reported energy content was substantially different (> 20 %) to measured energy content for 35 % of sampled menu items. There may be significant inaccuracies in reported energy content of calorie labelled menu items in English food outlets subject to mandatory calorie labelling.
期刊介绍:
British Journal of Nutrition is a leading international peer-reviewed journal covering research on human and clinical nutrition, animal nutrition and basic science as applied to nutrition. The Journal recognises the multidisciplinary nature of nutritional science and includes material from all of the specialities involved in nutrition research, including molecular and cell biology and nutritional genomics.