利用额肌的双向特性:超高注射技术。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Lehao Wu, Hengyuan Ma, Binghang Li, Yihao Xu, Jianjun You, Tailing Wang
{"title":"利用额肌的双向特性:超高注射技术。","authors":"Lehao Wu, Hengyuan Ma, Binghang Li, Yihao Xu, Jianjun You, Tailing Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-05241-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is widely used for forehead rejuvenation, but risks complications like brow ptosis with conventional pan-frontalis injections. Recent study highlights the frontalis muscle's bidirectional movement, demarcated by the line of convergence (C-line): The upper segment depresses the hairline and the lower segment elevates the brows. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a super-high BoNT injection technique, selectively targeting the upper frontalis above the C-line to reduce forehead lines while preserving brow position and mobility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-one East Asian participants (35-50 years) received BoNT injections (20 U/ml) at two midline points above the C-line (upper 1/5 of the forehead). Doses varied by gender (1.5-2 U/point). Three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry quantified brow position (BP), maximal brow height (MBH), and brow movement range (BMR) at baseline , 4 weeks, and 16 weeks. Forehead Wrinkle Scale (FWS) scores and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At T1, static FWS improved by 51% (1.00 ± 0.70 to 0.49 ± 0.50, p < 0.01) and dynamic FWS by 63% (2.51 ± 0.64 to 0.92 ± 0.64, p < 0.01), with 100% patient satisfaction. BP decreased marginally (left: 60.83 ± 3.21 mm to 60.44 ± 3.22 mm; right: 61.06 ± 2.95 mm to 60.69 ± 3.12 mm; p < 0.05), but BMR remained stable (p > 0.1), indicating preserved dynamic function. No brow ptosis or eyelid heaviness occurred. Static and dynamic FWS scores decreased by 51% (1.00 ± 0.70 to 0.49 ± 0.50, p < 0.01) and 63% (2.51 ± 0.64 to 0.92 ± 0.64, p < 0.01), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The super-high injection technique effectively reduces forehead wrinkles without disrupting brow dynamics, offering a safe alternative to pan-frontalis approaches. The absence of complications and preserved movement validated this anatomically guided approach as an alternative option for forehead rejuvenation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iv: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harnessing the Bidirectional Feature of the Frontalis Muscle: The Super-High Injection Technique.\",\"authors\":\"Lehao Wu, Hengyuan Ma, Binghang Li, Yihao Xu, Jianjun You, Tailing Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00266-025-05241-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is widely used for forehead rejuvenation, but risks complications like brow ptosis with conventional pan-frontalis injections. Recent study highlights the frontalis muscle's bidirectional movement, demarcated by the line of convergence (C-line): The upper segment depresses the hairline and the lower segment elevates the brows. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a super-high BoNT injection technique, selectively targeting the upper frontalis above the C-line to reduce forehead lines while preserving brow position and mobility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-one East Asian participants (35-50 years) received BoNT injections (20 U/ml) at two midline points above the C-line (upper 1/5 of the forehead). Doses varied by gender (1.5-2 U/point). Three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry quantified brow position (BP), maximal brow height (MBH), and brow movement range (BMR) at baseline , 4 weeks, and 16 weeks. Forehead Wrinkle Scale (FWS) scores and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At T1, static FWS improved by 51% (1.00 ± 0.70 to 0.49 ± 0.50, p < 0.01) and dynamic FWS by 63% (2.51 ± 0.64 to 0.92 ± 0.64, p < 0.01), with 100% patient satisfaction. BP decreased marginally (left: 60.83 ± 3.21 mm to 60.44 ± 3.22 mm; right: 61.06 ± 2.95 mm to 60.69 ± 3.12 mm; p < 0.05), but BMR remained stable (p > 0.1), indicating preserved dynamic function. No brow ptosis or eyelid heaviness occurred. Static and dynamic FWS scores decreased by 51% (1.00 ± 0.70 to 0.49 ± 0.50, p < 0.01) and 63% (2.51 ± 0.64 to 0.92 ± 0.64, p < 0.01), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The super-high injection technique effectively reduces forehead wrinkles without disrupting brow dynamics, offering a safe alternative to pan-frontalis approaches. The absence of complications and preserved movement validated this anatomically guided approach as an alternative option for forehead rejuvenation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iv: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-05241-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-05241-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肉毒杆菌神经毒素(BoNT)被广泛用于前额年轻化,但传统的泛额注射有眉下垂等并发症的风险。最近的研究强调了额肌的双向运动,由收敛线(c线)划分:上部部分压低发际线,下部部分抬高眉毛。本研究评估了一种超高BoNT注射技术的有效性和安全性,选择性地针对c线以上的上额肌,在保留额头位置和活动能力的同时减少前额纹。方法:41名东亚参与者(35-50岁)在c线以上的两个中线点(额头上1/5)注射BoNT (20 U/ml)。剂量因性别而异(1.5-2 U/点)。三维立体摄影测量在基线、4周和16周时量化眉毛位置(BP)、最大眉毛高度(MBH)和眉毛运动范围(BMR)。分析前额皱纹量表(FWS)评分和患者报告的结果。结果:T1时,静态FWS改善51%(1.00±0.70 ~ 0.49±0.50,p 0.1),表明动态功能保留。无眉下垂或眼睑重。静态和动态FWS评分下降了51%(1.00±0.70 ~ 0.49±0.50,p)。结论:超高注射技术在不影响眉毛动态的情况下有效减少了前额皱纹,是一种安全的替代方法。无并发症和保留运动证实了这种解剖引导入路作为前额年轻化的替代选择。证据等级iv:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定一个证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www.springer.com/00266。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Harnessing the Bidirectional Feature of the Frontalis Muscle: The Super-High Injection Technique.

Background: Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is widely used for forehead rejuvenation, but risks complications like brow ptosis with conventional pan-frontalis injections. Recent study highlights the frontalis muscle's bidirectional movement, demarcated by the line of convergence (C-line): The upper segment depresses the hairline and the lower segment elevates the brows. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a super-high BoNT injection technique, selectively targeting the upper frontalis above the C-line to reduce forehead lines while preserving brow position and mobility.

Methods: Forty-one East Asian participants (35-50 years) received BoNT injections (20 U/ml) at two midline points above the C-line (upper 1/5 of the forehead). Doses varied by gender (1.5-2 U/point). Three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry quantified brow position (BP), maximal brow height (MBH), and brow movement range (BMR) at baseline , 4 weeks, and 16 weeks. Forehead Wrinkle Scale (FWS) scores and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed.

Results: At T1, static FWS improved by 51% (1.00 ± 0.70 to 0.49 ± 0.50, p < 0.01) and dynamic FWS by 63% (2.51 ± 0.64 to 0.92 ± 0.64, p < 0.01), with 100% patient satisfaction. BP decreased marginally (left: 60.83 ± 3.21 mm to 60.44 ± 3.22 mm; right: 61.06 ± 2.95 mm to 60.69 ± 3.12 mm; p < 0.05), but BMR remained stable (p > 0.1), indicating preserved dynamic function. No brow ptosis or eyelid heaviness occurred. Static and dynamic FWS scores decreased by 51% (1.00 ± 0.70 to 0.49 ± 0.50, p < 0.01) and 63% (2.51 ± 0.64 to 0.92 ± 0.64, p < 0.01), respectively.

Conclusion: The super-high injection technique effectively reduces forehead wrinkles without disrupting brow dynamics, offering a safe alternative to pan-frontalis approaches. The absence of complications and preserved movement validated this anatomically guided approach as an alternative option for forehead rejuvenation.

Level of evidence iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信