推动青年共同设计人工智能驱动的数字精神卫生工具的道德准则

IF 8.7
C. A. Figueroa, G. Ramos, A. M. Psihogios, E. Ekuban, P. Bansie, M. de Haas, N. S. Karnik, O. Ajilore, E. E. Anderson, C. Stiles-Shields
{"title":"推动青年共同设计人工智能驱动的数字精神卫生工具的道德准则","authors":"C. A. Figueroa, G. Ramos, A. M. Psihogios, E. Ekuban, P. Bansie, M. de Haas, N. S. Karnik, O. Ajilore, E. E. Anderson, C. Stiles-Shields","doi":"10.1038/s44220-025-00467-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adolescents and young adults (AYA) often face mental health challenges and are heavily influenced by technology. Digital health interventions (DHIs), leveraging smartphone data and artificial intelligence, offer immense potential for personalized and accessible mental health support. However, ethical guidelines for DHI research fail to address AYA’s unique developmental and technological needs and leave crucial ethical questions unanswered. This gap creates risks of either over- or under-protecting AYA in DHI research, slowing progress and causing harm. This Perspective examines ethical gaps in DHI research for AYA, focusing on three critical domains: challenges of passive data collection and artificial intelligence, consent practices, and risks of exacerbating inequities. We propose an agenda for ethical guidance based on bioethical principles autonomy, respect for persons, beneficence and justice, developed through participatory research with AYA, particularly marginalized groups. We discuss methodologies to achieve this agenda, ensuring ethical, youth-focused and equitable DHI research for the mental health of AYA. Adolescents and young adults face unique ethical challenges in digital health interventions due to their developmental and technological needs. Here the authors identify critical ethical gaps in digital health interventions research for this population and emphasize the need to co-design ethical guidelines with youth, particularly those from marginalized backgrounds, rooted in core principles, such as autonomy, beneficence and justice.","PeriodicalId":74247,"journal":{"name":"Nature mental health","volume":"3 8","pages":"870-878"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing youth co-design of ethical guidelines for AI-powered digital mental health tools\",\"authors\":\"C. A. Figueroa, G. Ramos, A. M. Psihogios, E. Ekuban, P. Bansie, M. de Haas, N. S. Karnik, O. Ajilore, E. E. Anderson, C. Stiles-Shields\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44220-025-00467-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Adolescents and young adults (AYA) often face mental health challenges and are heavily influenced by technology. Digital health interventions (DHIs), leveraging smartphone data and artificial intelligence, offer immense potential for personalized and accessible mental health support. However, ethical guidelines for DHI research fail to address AYA’s unique developmental and technological needs and leave crucial ethical questions unanswered. This gap creates risks of either over- or under-protecting AYA in DHI research, slowing progress and causing harm. This Perspective examines ethical gaps in DHI research for AYA, focusing on three critical domains: challenges of passive data collection and artificial intelligence, consent practices, and risks of exacerbating inequities. We propose an agenda for ethical guidance based on bioethical principles autonomy, respect for persons, beneficence and justice, developed through participatory research with AYA, particularly marginalized groups. We discuss methodologies to achieve this agenda, ensuring ethical, youth-focused and equitable DHI research for the mental health of AYA. Adolescents and young adults face unique ethical challenges in digital health interventions due to their developmental and technological needs. Here the authors identify critical ethical gaps in digital health interventions research for this population and emphasize the need to co-design ethical guidelines with youth, particularly those from marginalized backgrounds, rooted in core principles, such as autonomy, beneficence and justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature mental health\",\"volume\":\"3 8\",\"pages\":\"870-878\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-025-00467-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-025-00467-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

青少年和青壮年(AYA)经常面临心理健康挑战,并受到技术的严重影响。利用智能手机数据和人工智能的数字卫生干预措施为个性化和可获得的精神卫生支持提供了巨大潜力。然而,DHI研究的伦理准则未能解决AYA独特的发展和技术需求,并留下了关键的伦理问题未得到解决。这一差距造成了在DHI研究中对AYA保护过度或保护不足的风险,从而减缓了进展并造成伤害。本展望探讨了AYA在DHI研究中的伦理差距,重点关注三个关键领域:被动数据收集和人工智能的挑战、同意实践以及加剧不平等的风险。我们提出了一个基于生物伦理原则的伦理指导议程,自主性,尊重人,仁慈和正义,通过与AYA,特别是边缘化群体的参与性研究制定。我们讨论了实现这一议程的方法,确保道德,以青年为重点和公平的DHI研究,以促进AYA的心理健康。由于青少年和年轻人的发展和技术需求,他们在数字卫生干预方面面临独特的伦理挑战。在这里,作者确定了针对这一人群的数字健康干预研究中的关键伦理差距,并强调需要与年轻人,特别是那些来自边缘背景的年轻人共同设计道德准则,这些准则植根于自主、慈善和正义等核心原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancing youth co-design of ethical guidelines for AI-powered digital mental health tools
Adolescents and young adults (AYA) often face mental health challenges and are heavily influenced by technology. Digital health interventions (DHIs), leveraging smartphone data and artificial intelligence, offer immense potential for personalized and accessible mental health support. However, ethical guidelines for DHI research fail to address AYA’s unique developmental and technological needs and leave crucial ethical questions unanswered. This gap creates risks of either over- or under-protecting AYA in DHI research, slowing progress and causing harm. This Perspective examines ethical gaps in DHI research for AYA, focusing on three critical domains: challenges of passive data collection and artificial intelligence, consent practices, and risks of exacerbating inequities. We propose an agenda for ethical guidance based on bioethical principles autonomy, respect for persons, beneficence and justice, developed through participatory research with AYA, particularly marginalized groups. We discuss methodologies to achieve this agenda, ensuring ethical, youth-focused and equitable DHI research for the mental health of AYA. Adolescents and young adults face unique ethical challenges in digital health interventions due to their developmental and technological needs. Here the authors identify critical ethical gaps in digital health interventions research for this population and emphasize the need to co-design ethical guidelines with youth, particularly those from marginalized backgrounds, rooted in core principles, such as autonomy, beneficence and justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信