{"title":"中美智慧城市科研趋势对比分析","authors":"Yuan Lai, Haoxiang Zhao","doi":"10.1038/s44284-025-00305-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The integrated concept of ‘smart cities’ has emerged as a key focus of contemporary research, yet efforts remain fragmented, split between technology-driven and human-centered approaches. Here we leverage open data and large language models to analyze smart city research proposals funded by the National Science Foundation in the USA and the National Natural Science Foundation of China. Our findings reveal common scientific inquiries alongside divergent research trajectories shaped by national contexts, exposing a persistent tension between techno-centric priorities and human-oriented imperatives. This comparative analysis of two leading global economies provides insights into the evolution of smart city research, highlighting both shared challenges and distinct pathways. Our results reveal common ground, divergent national priorities and funding mechanisms that risk dividing the field further. Smart city research remains fragmented between technology-driven and human-centered approaches, despite growing interest. This analysis of research proposals from the USA and China reveals common ground, divergent priorities and funding mechanisms that risk dividing the field further.","PeriodicalId":501700,"journal":{"name":"Nature Cities","volume":"2 9","pages":"875-883"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of smart city scientific research trends in the USA and China\",\"authors\":\"Yuan Lai, Haoxiang Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44284-025-00305-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The integrated concept of ‘smart cities’ has emerged as a key focus of contemporary research, yet efforts remain fragmented, split between technology-driven and human-centered approaches. Here we leverage open data and large language models to analyze smart city research proposals funded by the National Science Foundation in the USA and the National Natural Science Foundation of China. Our findings reveal common scientific inquiries alongside divergent research trajectories shaped by national contexts, exposing a persistent tension between techno-centric priorities and human-oriented imperatives. This comparative analysis of two leading global economies provides insights into the evolution of smart city research, highlighting both shared challenges and distinct pathways. Our results reveal common ground, divergent national priorities and funding mechanisms that risk dividing the field further. Smart city research remains fragmented between technology-driven and human-centered approaches, despite growing interest. This analysis of research proposals from the USA and China reveals common ground, divergent priorities and funding mechanisms that risk dividing the field further.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Cities\",\"volume\":\"2 9\",\"pages\":\"875-883\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44284-025-00305-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44284-025-00305-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative analysis of smart city scientific research trends in the USA and China
The integrated concept of ‘smart cities’ has emerged as a key focus of contemporary research, yet efforts remain fragmented, split between technology-driven and human-centered approaches. Here we leverage open data and large language models to analyze smart city research proposals funded by the National Science Foundation in the USA and the National Natural Science Foundation of China. Our findings reveal common scientific inquiries alongside divergent research trajectories shaped by national contexts, exposing a persistent tension between techno-centric priorities and human-oriented imperatives. This comparative analysis of two leading global economies provides insights into the evolution of smart city research, highlighting both shared challenges and distinct pathways. Our results reveal common ground, divergent national priorities and funding mechanisms that risk dividing the field further. Smart city research remains fragmented between technology-driven and human-centered approaches, despite growing interest. This analysis of research proposals from the USA and China reveals common ground, divergent priorities and funding mechanisms that risk dividing the field further.