地球物理法医事件监测研究进展

Michael E. Pasyanos, Christoph Pilger, Ruijia Wang  (, )
{"title":"地球物理法医事件监测研究进展","authors":"Michael E. Pasyanos, Christoph Pilger, Ruijia Wang \n (, )","doi":"10.1038/s43017-025-00702-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forensic analysis of man-made, non-nuclear events (such as industrial accidents, explosion experiments and mine collapses) has become more frequent and detailed owing to advancements in geophysical monitoring. In this Technical Review, we demonstrate how geophysical forensic monitoring using seismic, infrasound and hydroacoustic recordings provides insights on events in the solid earth, atmosphere and underwater. Advanced techniques, including machine-learning-based models, have been developed to detect, identify and investigate these events, providing information on location, subevents, sources and explosive yield. The increase in data availability, application of advanced methods and computation and the growth of multitechnology approaches have increased the accuracy of forensic event analysis and enabled more realistic characterization of uncertainties. For example, the 2020 Beirut explosion in Lebanon demonstrated that various seismic, acoustic and other methods could be used to estimate explosive yield (and yield uncertainties) of about 1 ktonne, providing confidence in the application of these methods to smaller events where data are available. However, forensic investigations remain largely limited to known events with identified sources. Increased access to data, sophisticated analysis methods and high-resolution earth models will improve forensic event analysis further, enabling civil and scientific applications, such as localization in the search for the lost ARA San Juan submarine. Forensic event analysis is used to investigate non-nuclear, man-made, explosion-like accidents and unanticipated events. This Technical Review outlines the techniques used to monitor and analyse the seismic, infrasound and hydroacoustic signals produced by such events in underground, near-surface, atmospheric and underwater domains.","PeriodicalId":18921,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Earth & Environment","volume":"6 8","pages":"521-534"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances in geophysical forensic event monitoring\",\"authors\":\"Michael E. Pasyanos, Christoph Pilger, Ruijia Wang \\n (, )\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s43017-025-00702-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Forensic analysis of man-made, non-nuclear events (such as industrial accidents, explosion experiments and mine collapses) has become more frequent and detailed owing to advancements in geophysical monitoring. In this Technical Review, we demonstrate how geophysical forensic monitoring using seismic, infrasound and hydroacoustic recordings provides insights on events in the solid earth, atmosphere and underwater. Advanced techniques, including machine-learning-based models, have been developed to detect, identify and investigate these events, providing information on location, subevents, sources and explosive yield. The increase in data availability, application of advanced methods and computation and the growth of multitechnology approaches have increased the accuracy of forensic event analysis and enabled more realistic characterization of uncertainties. For example, the 2020 Beirut explosion in Lebanon demonstrated that various seismic, acoustic and other methods could be used to estimate explosive yield (and yield uncertainties) of about 1 ktonne, providing confidence in the application of these methods to smaller events where data are available. However, forensic investigations remain largely limited to known events with identified sources. Increased access to data, sophisticated analysis methods and high-resolution earth models will improve forensic event analysis further, enabling civil and scientific applications, such as localization in the search for the lost ARA San Juan submarine. Forensic event analysis is used to investigate non-nuclear, man-made, explosion-like accidents and unanticipated events. This Technical Review outlines the techniques used to monitor and analyse the seismic, infrasound and hydroacoustic signals produced by such events in underground, near-surface, atmospheric and underwater domains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Earth & Environment\",\"volume\":\"6 8\",\"pages\":\"521-534\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Earth & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43017-025-00702-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Earth & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43017-025-00702-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于地球物理监测的进步,对人为的非核事件(如工业事故、爆炸实验和矿井坍塌)的法医分析变得更加频繁和详细。在这篇技术评论中,我们展示了地球物理法医监测如何使用地震、次声和水声记录来提供对固体地球、大气和水下事件的见解。包括基于机器学习的模型在内的先进技术已经被开发出来,用于检测、识别和调查这些事件,提供有关地点、子事件、来源和爆炸当量的信息。数据可用性的增加、先进方法和计算的应用以及多技术方法的发展提高了法医事件分析的准确性,并能够更现实地描述不确定性。例如,2020年黎巴嫩贝鲁特爆炸表明,可以使用各种地震、声学和其他方法来估计约1千吨的爆炸当量(和当量不确定性),这为将这些方法应用于有数据的较小事件提供了信心。然而,法医调查仍然主要局限于已查明来源的已知事件。增加对数据的访问,复杂的分析方法和高分辨率地球模型将进一步改善法医事件分析,使民用和科学应用成为可能,例如寻找失踪的ARA圣胡安潜艇的本地化。法医事件分析用于调查非核、人为、爆炸类事故和意外事件。本技术评论概述了用于监测和分析地下、近地表、大气和水下领域此类事件产生的地震、次声和水声信号的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Advances in geophysical forensic event monitoring

Advances in geophysical forensic event monitoring
Forensic analysis of man-made, non-nuclear events (such as industrial accidents, explosion experiments and mine collapses) has become more frequent and detailed owing to advancements in geophysical monitoring. In this Technical Review, we demonstrate how geophysical forensic monitoring using seismic, infrasound and hydroacoustic recordings provides insights on events in the solid earth, atmosphere and underwater. Advanced techniques, including machine-learning-based models, have been developed to detect, identify and investigate these events, providing information on location, subevents, sources and explosive yield. The increase in data availability, application of advanced methods and computation and the growth of multitechnology approaches have increased the accuracy of forensic event analysis and enabled more realistic characterization of uncertainties. For example, the 2020 Beirut explosion in Lebanon demonstrated that various seismic, acoustic and other methods could be used to estimate explosive yield (and yield uncertainties) of about 1 ktonne, providing confidence in the application of these methods to smaller events where data are available. However, forensic investigations remain largely limited to known events with identified sources. Increased access to data, sophisticated analysis methods and high-resolution earth models will improve forensic event analysis further, enabling civil and scientific applications, such as localization in the search for the lost ARA San Juan submarine. Forensic event analysis is used to investigate non-nuclear, man-made, explosion-like accidents and unanticipated events. This Technical Review outlines the techniques used to monitor and analyse the seismic, infrasound and hydroacoustic signals produced by such events in underground, near-surface, atmospheric and underwater domains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信