Fouzia Akter, Neiva Banze, Igor Capitine, Kondwani Chidziwisano, Jenala Chipungu, Catildo Cubai, Oliver Cumming, Robert Dreibelbis, Patrick Vidzo Katana, Cremildo Manhiça, Mindy Panulo, Priya Rampal, Anjali Sharma, Sheillah Simiyu, Abiy Tafesse, James Ben Tidwell, Edna Viegas, Blessings White, Ian Ross
{"title":"卫生相关生活质量指数(SanQoL-5)在六个国家的效度和信度","authors":"Fouzia Akter, Neiva Banze, Igor Capitine, Kondwani Chidziwisano, Jenala Chipungu, Catildo Cubai, Oliver Cumming, Robert Dreibelbis, Patrick Vidzo Katana, Cremildo Manhiça, Mindy Panulo, Priya Rampal, Anjali Sharma, Sheillah Simiyu, Abiy Tafesse, James Ben Tidwell, Edna Viegas, Blessings White, Ian Ross","doi":"10.1038/s44221-025-00434-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainable Development Goal 6.2 measures sanitation progress by type of toilet service. Improving people’s subjective sanitation experiences is also important but rarely rigorously measured. The Sanitation-related Quality of Life index (SanQoL-5) combines answers to five simple questions (disgust, privacy, disease risk, shame and safety) into an overall score ranging from 0 to 1. Here we evaluated the validity and reliability of SanQoL-5 by interviewing 6,165 people across rural and urban areas of six countries: Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia. We found good evidence for construct validity, with support (P < 0.05) for 87% of hypothesized associations between SanQoL-5 and toilet quality characteristics. In 75 intercountry comparisons, only 9% of instances showed evidence of meaningful differential item functioning, suggesting good cross-cultural comparability. SanQoL-5 conformed to expectations in item response theory models, and we found evidence of convergent, discriminant and known groups validity. SanQoL-5 can be used in impact evaluation, monitoring, needs assessment and benefit–cost analysis. The Sanitation-related Quality of Life index (SanQoL-5) combines answers to five questions (disgust, privacy, disease, shame and safety) into a score ranging from 0 to 1. This study found good evidence for the validity and cross-cultural comparability of SanQoL-5.","PeriodicalId":74252,"journal":{"name":"Nature water","volume":"3 5","pages":"571-579"},"PeriodicalIF":24.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s44221-025-00434-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of the Sanitation-related Quality of Life index (SanQoL-5) in six countries\",\"authors\":\"Fouzia Akter, Neiva Banze, Igor Capitine, Kondwani Chidziwisano, Jenala Chipungu, Catildo Cubai, Oliver Cumming, Robert Dreibelbis, Patrick Vidzo Katana, Cremildo Manhiça, Mindy Panulo, Priya Rampal, Anjali Sharma, Sheillah Simiyu, Abiy Tafesse, James Ben Tidwell, Edna Viegas, Blessings White, Ian Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44221-025-00434-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sustainable Development Goal 6.2 measures sanitation progress by type of toilet service. Improving people’s subjective sanitation experiences is also important but rarely rigorously measured. The Sanitation-related Quality of Life index (SanQoL-5) combines answers to five simple questions (disgust, privacy, disease risk, shame and safety) into an overall score ranging from 0 to 1. Here we evaluated the validity and reliability of SanQoL-5 by interviewing 6,165 people across rural and urban areas of six countries: Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia. We found good evidence for construct validity, with support (P < 0.05) for 87% of hypothesized associations between SanQoL-5 and toilet quality characteristics. In 75 intercountry comparisons, only 9% of instances showed evidence of meaningful differential item functioning, suggesting good cross-cultural comparability. SanQoL-5 conformed to expectations in item response theory models, and we found evidence of convergent, discriminant and known groups validity. SanQoL-5 can be used in impact evaluation, monitoring, needs assessment and benefit–cost analysis. The Sanitation-related Quality of Life index (SanQoL-5) combines answers to five questions (disgust, privacy, disease, shame and safety) into a score ranging from 0 to 1. This study found good evidence for the validity and cross-cultural comparability of SanQoL-5.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature water\",\"volume\":\"3 5\",\"pages\":\"571-579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":24.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s44221-025-00434-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature water\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44221-025-00434-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44221-025-00434-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validity and reliability of the Sanitation-related Quality of Life index (SanQoL-5) in six countries
Sustainable Development Goal 6.2 measures sanitation progress by type of toilet service. Improving people’s subjective sanitation experiences is also important but rarely rigorously measured. The Sanitation-related Quality of Life index (SanQoL-5) combines answers to five simple questions (disgust, privacy, disease risk, shame and safety) into an overall score ranging from 0 to 1. Here we evaluated the validity and reliability of SanQoL-5 by interviewing 6,165 people across rural and urban areas of six countries: Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia. We found good evidence for construct validity, with support (P < 0.05) for 87% of hypothesized associations between SanQoL-5 and toilet quality characteristics. In 75 intercountry comparisons, only 9% of instances showed evidence of meaningful differential item functioning, suggesting good cross-cultural comparability. SanQoL-5 conformed to expectations in item response theory models, and we found evidence of convergent, discriminant and known groups validity. SanQoL-5 can be used in impact evaluation, monitoring, needs assessment and benefit–cost analysis. The Sanitation-related Quality of Life index (SanQoL-5) combines answers to five questions (disgust, privacy, disease, shame and safety) into a score ranging from 0 to 1. This study found good evidence for the validity and cross-cultural comparability of SanQoL-5.