卫生相关生活质量指数(SanQoL-5)在六个国家的效度和信度

IF 24.1
Fouzia Akter, Neiva Banze, Igor Capitine, Kondwani Chidziwisano, Jenala Chipungu, Catildo Cubai, Oliver Cumming, Robert Dreibelbis, Patrick Vidzo Katana, Cremildo Manhiça, Mindy Panulo, Priya Rampal, Anjali Sharma, Sheillah Simiyu, Abiy Tafesse, James Ben Tidwell, Edna Viegas, Blessings White, Ian Ross
{"title":"卫生相关生活质量指数(SanQoL-5)在六个国家的效度和信度","authors":"Fouzia Akter, Neiva Banze, Igor Capitine, Kondwani Chidziwisano, Jenala Chipungu, Catildo Cubai, Oliver Cumming, Robert Dreibelbis, Patrick Vidzo Katana, Cremildo Manhiça, Mindy Panulo, Priya Rampal, Anjali Sharma, Sheillah Simiyu, Abiy Tafesse, James Ben Tidwell, Edna Viegas, Blessings White, Ian Ross","doi":"10.1038/s44221-025-00434-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainable Development Goal 6.2 measures sanitation progress by type of toilet service. Improving people’s subjective sanitation experiences is also important but rarely rigorously measured. The Sanitation-related Quality of Life index (SanQoL-5) combines answers to five simple questions (disgust, privacy, disease risk, shame and safety) into an overall score ranging from 0 to 1. Here we evaluated the validity and reliability of SanQoL-5 by interviewing 6,165 people across rural and urban areas of six countries: Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia. We found good evidence for construct validity, with support (P < 0.05) for 87% of hypothesized associations between SanQoL-5 and toilet quality characteristics. In 75 intercountry comparisons, only 9% of instances showed evidence of meaningful differential item functioning, suggesting good cross-cultural comparability. SanQoL-5 conformed to expectations in item response theory models, and we found evidence of convergent, discriminant and known groups validity. SanQoL-5 can be used in impact evaluation, monitoring, needs assessment and benefit–cost analysis. The Sanitation-related Quality of Life index (SanQoL-5) combines answers to five questions (disgust, privacy, disease, shame and safety) into a score ranging from 0 to 1. This study found good evidence for the validity and cross-cultural comparability of SanQoL-5.","PeriodicalId":74252,"journal":{"name":"Nature water","volume":"3 5","pages":"571-579"},"PeriodicalIF":24.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s44221-025-00434-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of the Sanitation-related Quality of Life index (SanQoL-5) in six countries\",\"authors\":\"Fouzia Akter, Neiva Banze, Igor Capitine, Kondwani Chidziwisano, Jenala Chipungu, Catildo Cubai, Oliver Cumming, Robert Dreibelbis, Patrick Vidzo Katana, Cremildo Manhiça, Mindy Panulo, Priya Rampal, Anjali Sharma, Sheillah Simiyu, Abiy Tafesse, James Ben Tidwell, Edna Viegas, Blessings White, Ian Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44221-025-00434-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sustainable Development Goal 6.2 measures sanitation progress by type of toilet service. Improving people’s subjective sanitation experiences is also important but rarely rigorously measured. The Sanitation-related Quality of Life index (SanQoL-5) combines answers to five simple questions (disgust, privacy, disease risk, shame and safety) into an overall score ranging from 0 to 1. Here we evaluated the validity and reliability of SanQoL-5 by interviewing 6,165 people across rural and urban areas of six countries: Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia. We found good evidence for construct validity, with support (P < 0.05) for 87% of hypothesized associations between SanQoL-5 and toilet quality characteristics. In 75 intercountry comparisons, only 9% of instances showed evidence of meaningful differential item functioning, suggesting good cross-cultural comparability. SanQoL-5 conformed to expectations in item response theory models, and we found evidence of convergent, discriminant and known groups validity. SanQoL-5 can be used in impact evaluation, monitoring, needs assessment and benefit–cost analysis. The Sanitation-related Quality of Life index (SanQoL-5) combines answers to five questions (disgust, privacy, disease, shame and safety) into a score ranging from 0 to 1. This study found good evidence for the validity and cross-cultural comparability of SanQoL-5.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature water\",\"volume\":\"3 5\",\"pages\":\"571-579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":24.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s44221-025-00434-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature water\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44221-025-00434-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44221-025-00434-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可持续发展目标6.2按厕所服务类型衡量环境卫生进展。改善人们的主观卫生体验也很重要,但很少进行严格衡量。与卫生相关的生活质量指数(SanQoL-5)将五个简单问题(厌恶、隐私、疾病风险、羞耻和安全)的答案结合起来,形成一个从0到1的总分。在这里,我们通过访问来自埃塞俄比亚、印度、肯尼亚、马拉维、莫桑比克和赞比亚六个国家的农村和城市地区的6165人来评估SanQoL-5的效度和信度。我们发现建构效度的良好证据,87%的SanQoL-5与厕所质量特征之间的假设关联得到支持(P < 0.05)。在75个国家间比较中,只有9%的实例显示有意义的差异项目功能的证据,这表明良好的跨文化可比性。SanQoL-5符合项目反应理论模型的期望,并且我们发现了收敛效度、判别效度和已知组效度的证据。SanQoL-5可用于影响评价、监测、需求评估和效益成本分析。与卫生相关的生活质量指数(SanQoL-5)综合了五个问题(厌恶、隐私、疾病、羞耻和安全)的答案,得分范围从0到1。本研究为SanQoL-5的有效性和跨文化可比性提供了很好的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Validity and reliability of the Sanitation-related Quality of Life index (SanQoL-5) in six countries

Validity and reliability of the Sanitation-related Quality of Life index (SanQoL-5) in six countries
Sustainable Development Goal 6.2 measures sanitation progress by type of toilet service. Improving people’s subjective sanitation experiences is also important but rarely rigorously measured. The Sanitation-related Quality of Life index (SanQoL-5) combines answers to five simple questions (disgust, privacy, disease risk, shame and safety) into an overall score ranging from 0 to 1. Here we evaluated the validity and reliability of SanQoL-5 by interviewing 6,165 people across rural and urban areas of six countries: Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia. We found good evidence for construct validity, with support (P < 0.05) for 87% of hypothesized associations between SanQoL-5 and toilet quality characteristics. In 75 intercountry comparisons, only 9% of instances showed evidence of meaningful differential item functioning, suggesting good cross-cultural comparability. SanQoL-5 conformed to expectations in item response theory models, and we found evidence of convergent, discriminant and known groups validity. SanQoL-5 can be used in impact evaluation, monitoring, needs assessment and benefit–cost analysis. The Sanitation-related Quality of Life index (SanQoL-5) combines answers to five questions (disgust, privacy, disease, shame and safety) into a score ranging from 0 to 1. This study found good evidence for the validity and cross-cultural comparability of SanQoL-5.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信