Elnaz S. Mirdamadi, Seyyedmorteza Attari, Cato T. Laurencin
{"title":"规范肩袖撕裂合成基质的临床试验","authors":"Elnaz S. Mirdamadi, Seyyedmorteza Attari, Cato T. Laurencin","doi":"10.1038/s44222-025-00292-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical reports on synthetic matrices for rotator cuff tears (RCTs) have varied outcomes owing to limitations such as inconsistency in follow-up time, small sample sizes and lack of control groups. Standardized methods are crucial to optimize synthetic matrix applications and ensure consistent results in tendon repair.","PeriodicalId":74248,"journal":{"name":"Nature reviews bioengineering","volume":"3 6","pages":"441-443"},"PeriodicalIF":37.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardizing clinical trials for synthetic matrices in rotator cuff tears\",\"authors\":\"Elnaz S. Mirdamadi, Seyyedmorteza Attari, Cato T. Laurencin\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44222-025-00292-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clinical reports on synthetic matrices for rotator cuff tears (RCTs) have varied outcomes owing to limitations such as inconsistency in follow-up time, small sample sizes and lack of control groups. Standardized methods are crucial to optimize synthetic matrix applications and ensure consistent results in tendon repair.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature reviews bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"3 6\",\"pages\":\"441-443\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":37.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature reviews bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44222-025-00292-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature reviews bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44222-025-00292-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Standardizing clinical trials for synthetic matrices in rotator cuff tears
Clinical reports on synthetic matrices for rotator cuff tears (RCTs) have varied outcomes owing to limitations such as inconsistency in follow-up time, small sample sizes and lack of control groups. Standardized methods are crucial to optimize synthetic matrix applications and ensure consistent results in tendon repair.