社会学对野生动物研究的贡献:野生动物健康焦点

IF 4.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Helen Masterman-Smith , Andrew Peters , John Rafferty
{"title":"社会学对野生动物研究的贡献:野生动物健康焦点","authors":"Helen Masterman-Smith ,&nbsp;Andrew Peters ,&nbsp;John Rafferty","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article examines the emerging field of wildlife sociology, emphasising the potential of a social model of conservation to foster increased public engagement in wildlife health. Our illustrative literature review of some wildlife sociology articles (<em>n</em> = 52) explored the scope of this field, and the research approaches and sociological analyses commonly employed. Our analysis focused on three key areas: the application of sociological imagination, the applicability of social model of conservation themes adapted from the ‘social model of health,’ and public willingness and ability to help wildlife. Our illustrative review found that despite being in its early stages, and the research approaches mainly consisting of exploratory and case study research, the scope of field is expanding. Regarding the application of the sociological imagination, the cultural and structural lenses are garnering more attention than the historical and critical lenses. With respect to social model of health themes, social construction and social organisation aspects of wildlife issues are receiving greater attention than social inequality, social production, and social distribution themes. We found just six articles on public willingness and ability to help wildlife, compared to a preponderance of studies concerning negative human-wildlife interactions, illustrating an important gap in sociology's contribution to wildlife studies, which could assist further exploration of a social model of conservation and its potential to foster public support for wildlife health. Such a model could echo the advancements seen in human health outcomes following its shift from a largely bioscientific model to a social model in the 1940s, with important assistance from the sociology discipline.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"312 ","pages":"Article 111508"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sociology contributions to wildlife studies: A wildlife health focus\",\"authors\":\"Helen Masterman-Smith ,&nbsp;Andrew Peters ,&nbsp;John Rafferty\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article examines the emerging field of wildlife sociology, emphasising the potential of a social model of conservation to foster increased public engagement in wildlife health. Our illustrative literature review of some wildlife sociology articles (<em>n</em> = 52) explored the scope of this field, and the research approaches and sociological analyses commonly employed. Our analysis focused on three key areas: the application of sociological imagination, the applicability of social model of conservation themes adapted from the ‘social model of health,’ and public willingness and ability to help wildlife. Our illustrative review found that despite being in its early stages, and the research approaches mainly consisting of exploratory and case study research, the scope of field is expanding. Regarding the application of the sociological imagination, the cultural and structural lenses are garnering more attention than the historical and critical lenses. With respect to social model of health themes, social construction and social organisation aspects of wildlife issues are receiving greater attention than social inequality, social production, and social distribution themes. We found just six articles on public willingness and ability to help wildlife, compared to a preponderance of studies concerning negative human-wildlife interactions, illustrating an important gap in sociology's contribution to wildlife studies, which could assist further exploration of a social model of conservation and its potential to foster public support for wildlife health. Such a model could echo the advancements seen in human health outcomes following its shift from a largely bioscientific model to a social model in the 1940s, with important assistance from the sociology discipline.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Conservation\",\"volume\":\"312 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111508\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725005452\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725005452","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了新兴的野生动物社会学领域,强调了社会保护模式的潜力,以促进公众对野生动物健康的更多参与。我们对一些野生动物社会学文章(n = 52)进行了解释性文献综述,探讨了该领域的范围、研究方法和常用的社会学分析。我们的分析集中在三个关键领域:社会学想象力的应用,从“健康社会模式”改编的保护主题的社会模式的适用性,以及公众帮助野生动物的意愿和能力。我们的说明性回顾发现,尽管研究还处于初级阶段,研究方法主要以探索性研究和案例研究为主,但研究领域的范围正在扩大。在社会学想象的运用上,文化和结构的视角比历史和批判的视角更受关注。关于健康主题的社会模式,野生动物问题的社会建设和社会组织方面比社会不平等、社会生产和社会分配主题更受关注。我们只发现了6篇关于公众帮助野生动物的意愿和能力的文章,相比之下,关于人类与野生动物负面互动的研究占了优势,这说明了社会学对野生动物研究的重要贡献,这可以帮助进一步探索保护的社会模式及其促进公众支持野生动物健康的潜力。在社会学学科的重要帮助下,这种模式可以呼应20世纪40年代从主要是生物科学模式转向社会模式后在人类健康结果方面所取得的进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sociology contributions to wildlife studies: A wildlife health focus
This article examines the emerging field of wildlife sociology, emphasising the potential of a social model of conservation to foster increased public engagement in wildlife health. Our illustrative literature review of some wildlife sociology articles (n = 52) explored the scope of this field, and the research approaches and sociological analyses commonly employed. Our analysis focused on three key areas: the application of sociological imagination, the applicability of social model of conservation themes adapted from the ‘social model of health,’ and public willingness and ability to help wildlife. Our illustrative review found that despite being in its early stages, and the research approaches mainly consisting of exploratory and case study research, the scope of field is expanding. Regarding the application of the sociological imagination, the cultural and structural lenses are garnering more attention than the historical and critical lenses. With respect to social model of health themes, social construction and social organisation aspects of wildlife issues are receiving greater attention than social inequality, social production, and social distribution themes. We found just six articles on public willingness and ability to help wildlife, compared to a preponderance of studies concerning negative human-wildlife interactions, illustrating an important gap in sociology's contribution to wildlife studies, which could assist further exploration of a social model of conservation and its potential to foster public support for wildlife health. Such a model could echo the advancements seen in human health outcomes following its shift from a largely bioscientific model to a social model in the 1940s, with important assistance from the sociology discipline.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信