Helen Masterman-Smith , Andrew Peters , John Rafferty
{"title":"社会学对野生动物研究的贡献:野生动物健康焦点","authors":"Helen Masterman-Smith , Andrew Peters , John Rafferty","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article examines the emerging field of wildlife sociology, emphasising the potential of a social model of conservation to foster increased public engagement in wildlife health. Our illustrative literature review of some wildlife sociology articles (<em>n</em> = 52) explored the scope of this field, and the research approaches and sociological analyses commonly employed. Our analysis focused on three key areas: the application of sociological imagination, the applicability of social model of conservation themes adapted from the ‘social model of health,’ and public willingness and ability to help wildlife. Our illustrative review found that despite being in its early stages, and the research approaches mainly consisting of exploratory and case study research, the scope of field is expanding. Regarding the application of the sociological imagination, the cultural and structural lenses are garnering more attention than the historical and critical lenses. With respect to social model of health themes, social construction and social organisation aspects of wildlife issues are receiving greater attention than social inequality, social production, and social distribution themes. We found just six articles on public willingness and ability to help wildlife, compared to a preponderance of studies concerning negative human-wildlife interactions, illustrating an important gap in sociology's contribution to wildlife studies, which could assist further exploration of a social model of conservation and its potential to foster public support for wildlife health. Such a model could echo the advancements seen in human health outcomes following its shift from a largely bioscientific model to a social model in the 1940s, with important assistance from the sociology discipline.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"312 ","pages":"Article 111508"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sociology contributions to wildlife studies: A wildlife health focus\",\"authors\":\"Helen Masterman-Smith , Andrew Peters , John Rafferty\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article examines the emerging field of wildlife sociology, emphasising the potential of a social model of conservation to foster increased public engagement in wildlife health. Our illustrative literature review of some wildlife sociology articles (<em>n</em> = 52) explored the scope of this field, and the research approaches and sociological analyses commonly employed. Our analysis focused on three key areas: the application of sociological imagination, the applicability of social model of conservation themes adapted from the ‘social model of health,’ and public willingness and ability to help wildlife. Our illustrative review found that despite being in its early stages, and the research approaches mainly consisting of exploratory and case study research, the scope of field is expanding. Regarding the application of the sociological imagination, the cultural and structural lenses are garnering more attention than the historical and critical lenses. With respect to social model of health themes, social construction and social organisation aspects of wildlife issues are receiving greater attention than social inequality, social production, and social distribution themes. We found just six articles on public willingness and ability to help wildlife, compared to a preponderance of studies concerning negative human-wildlife interactions, illustrating an important gap in sociology's contribution to wildlife studies, which could assist further exploration of a social model of conservation and its potential to foster public support for wildlife health. Such a model could echo the advancements seen in human health outcomes following its shift from a largely bioscientific model to a social model in the 1940s, with important assistance from the sociology discipline.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Conservation\",\"volume\":\"312 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111508\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725005452\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725005452","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sociology contributions to wildlife studies: A wildlife health focus
This article examines the emerging field of wildlife sociology, emphasising the potential of a social model of conservation to foster increased public engagement in wildlife health. Our illustrative literature review of some wildlife sociology articles (n = 52) explored the scope of this field, and the research approaches and sociological analyses commonly employed. Our analysis focused on three key areas: the application of sociological imagination, the applicability of social model of conservation themes adapted from the ‘social model of health,’ and public willingness and ability to help wildlife. Our illustrative review found that despite being in its early stages, and the research approaches mainly consisting of exploratory and case study research, the scope of field is expanding. Regarding the application of the sociological imagination, the cultural and structural lenses are garnering more attention than the historical and critical lenses. With respect to social model of health themes, social construction and social organisation aspects of wildlife issues are receiving greater attention than social inequality, social production, and social distribution themes. We found just six articles on public willingness and ability to help wildlife, compared to a preponderance of studies concerning negative human-wildlife interactions, illustrating an important gap in sociology's contribution to wildlife studies, which could assist further exploration of a social model of conservation and its potential to foster public support for wildlife health. Such a model could echo the advancements seen in human health outcomes following its shift from a largely bioscientific model to a social model in the 1940s, with important assistance from the sociology discipline.
期刊介绍:
Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.