性工作者参与实地和在线互助:探索加拿大温哥华社区群体获得基层支持网络的途径(2020-2024)

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jennie Pearson , Andrea Krüsi , Kate Shannon , Charlie Zhou , Shira M. Goldenberg
{"title":"性工作者参与实地和在线互助:探索加拿大温哥华社区群体获得基层支持网络的途径(2020-2024)","authors":"Jennie Pearson ,&nbsp;Andrea Krüsi ,&nbsp;Kate Shannon ,&nbsp;Charlie Zhou ,&nbsp;Shira M. Goldenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mutual aid is the practice of grassroots support based on principles of direct action and non-hierarchical cooperation, central to the health and well-being of marginalized communities including sex workers. Despite mutual aid's centrality to sex workers' well-being, there is a dearth of health research on sex workers' uptake of mutual aid, particularly digital modes, and its relationship to supportive occupational conditions. Drawing on longitudinal cohort data, we measured recent mutual aid and its association with structural and occupational conditions among 900+ sex workers in Metro Vancouver, Canada. Informed by mutual aid principles and a structural determinants framework, we examined uptake of “digital” and “on-the-ground” (i.e., in-person) mutual aid and explored associations with occupational conditions in a community-based cohort of sex workers over four years (2020–24). Among 367 sex workers, 37.2 % and 58 % reported engaging in digital and on-the-ground mutual aid, respectively. We found higher odds of utilizing “on-the-ground” mutual aid among those experiencing recent physical/sexual violence and lower odds of digital mutual aid among sex workers who experienced lifetime incarceration. The findings affirm engagement with mutual aid as a critical support model for sex workers, while highlighting barriers to emerging digital modalities. There is need for full decriminalization of sex work and the democratization of digital tools to reduce barriers to essential resources and support networks. Further, our findings underscore the potential of mutual aid principles within public health, by learning from communities who have cultivated grassroots models of care in the context of structural exclusion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"385 ","pages":"Article 118582"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex workers’ engagement with mutual aid on-the-ground and online: Exploring access to grassroots support networks among a community-based cohort in Vancouver, Canada (2020–2024)\",\"authors\":\"Jennie Pearson ,&nbsp;Andrea Krüsi ,&nbsp;Kate Shannon ,&nbsp;Charlie Zhou ,&nbsp;Shira M. Goldenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Mutual aid is the practice of grassroots support based on principles of direct action and non-hierarchical cooperation, central to the health and well-being of marginalized communities including sex workers. Despite mutual aid's centrality to sex workers' well-being, there is a dearth of health research on sex workers' uptake of mutual aid, particularly digital modes, and its relationship to supportive occupational conditions. Drawing on longitudinal cohort data, we measured recent mutual aid and its association with structural and occupational conditions among 900+ sex workers in Metro Vancouver, Canada. Informed by mutual aid principles and a structural determinants framework, we examined uptake of “digital” and “on-the-ground” (i.e., in-person) mutual aid and explored associations with occupational conditions in a community-based cohort of sex workers over four years (2020–24). Among 367 sex workers, 37.2 % and 58 % reported engaging in digital and on-the-ground mutual aid, respectively. We found higher odds of utilizing “on-the-ground” mutual aid among those experiencing recent physical/sexual violence and lower odds of digital mutual aid among sex workers who experienced lifetime incarceration. The findings affirm engagement with mutual aid as a critical support model for sex workers, while highlighting barriers to emerging digital modalities. There is need for full decriminalization of sex work and the democratization of digital tools to reduce barriers to essential resources and support networks. Further, our findings underscore the potential of mutual aid principles within public health, by learning from communities who have cultivated grassroots models of care in the context of structural exclusion.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"385 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118582\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362500913X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362500913X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

互助是基于直接行动和不分等级合作原则的基层支持做法,对包括性工作者在内的边缘化社区的健康和福祉至关重要。尽管互助对性工作者的福祉至关重要,但缺乏关于性工作者接受互助的健康研究,特别是数字模式,以及它与支持性职业条件的关系。利用纵向队列数据,我们测量了加拿大大温哥华900多名性工作者最近的互助情况及其与结构和职业状况的关系。根据互助原则和结构决定因素框架,我们检查了“数字”和“实地”(即面对面)互助的吸收情况,并探讨了四年(2020 - 2024年)以社区为基础的性工作者队列与职业条件的关系。在367名性工作者中,37.2%和58%的人分别报告参与了数字和现场互助。我们发现,在最近遭受身体/性暴力的性工作者中,使用“现场”互助的几率较高,而在经历过终身监禁的性工作者中,使用数字互助的几率较低。调查结果肯定了互助是性工作者的重要支持模式,同时强调了新兴数字模式的障碍。有必要将性工作完全非刑事化,并使数字工具民主化,以减少获得基本资源和支持网络的障碍。此外,我们的研究结果强调了互助原则在公共卫生领域的潜力,通过向在结构性排斥背景下培养基层护理模式的社区学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex workers’ engagement with mutual aid on-the-ground and online: Exploring access to grassroots support networks among a community-based cohort in Vancouver, Canada (2020–2024)
Mutual aid is the practice of grassroots support based on principles of direct action and non-hierarchical cooperation, central to the health and well-being of marginalized communities including sex workers. Despite mutual aid's centrality to sex workers' well-being, there is a dearth of health research on sex workers' uptake of mutual aid, particularly digital modes, and its relationship to supportive occupational conditions. Drawing on longitudinal cohort data, we measured recent mutual aid and its association with structural and occupational conditions among 900+ sex workers in Metro Vancouver, Canada. Informed by mutual aid principles and a structural determinants framework, we examined uptake of “digital” and “on-the-ground” (i.e., in-person) mutual aid and explored associations with occupational conditions in a community-based cohort of sex workers over four years (2020–24). Among 367 sex workers, 37.2 % and 58 % reported engaging in digital and on-the-ground mutual aid, respectively. We found higher odds of utilizing “on-the-ground” mutual aid among those experiencing recent physical/sexual violence and lower odds of digital mutual aid among sex workers who experienced lifetime incarceration. The findings affirm engagement with mutual aid as a critical support model for sex workers, while highlighting barriers to emerging digital modalities. There is need for full decriminalization of sex work and the democratization of digital tools to reduce barriers to essential resources and support networks. Further, our findings underscore the potential of mutual aid principles within public health, by learning from communities who have cultivated grassroots models of care in the context of structural exclusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信