Jennie Pearson , Andrea Krüsi , Kate Shannon , Charlie Zhou , Shira M. Goldenberg
{"title":"性工作者参与实地和在线互助:探索加拿大温哥华社区群体获得基层支持网络的途径(2020-2024)","authors":"Jennie Pearson , Andrea Krüsi , Kate Shannon , Charlie Zhou , Shira M. Goldenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mutual aid is the practice of grassroots support based on principles of direct action and non-hierarchical cooperation, central to the health and well-being of marginalized communities including sex workers. Despite mutual aid's centrality to sex workers' well-being, there is a dearth of health research on sex workers' uptake of mutual aid, particularly digital modes, and its relationship to supportive occupational conditions. Drawing on longitudinal cohort data, we measured recent mutual aid and its association with structural and occupational conditions among 900+ sex workers in Metro Vancouver, Canada. Informed by mutual aid principles and a structural determinants framework, we examined uptake of “digital” and “on-the-ground” (i.e., in-person) mutual aid and explored associations with occupational conditions in a community-based cohort of sex workers over four years (2020–24). Among 367 sex workers, 37.2 % and 58 % reported engaging in digital and on-the-ground mutual aid, respectively. We found higher odds of utilizing “on-the-ground” mutual aid among those experiencing recent physical/sexual violence and lower odds of digital mutual aid among sex workers who experienced lifetime incarceration. The findings affirm engagement with mutual aid as a critical support model for sex workers, while highlighting barriers to emerging digital modalities. There is need for full decriminalization of sex work and the democratization of digital tools to reduce barriers to essential resources and support networks. Further, our findings underscore the potential of mutual aid principles within public health, by learning from communities who have cultivated grassroots models of care in the context of structural exclusion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"385 ","pages":"Article 118582"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex workers’ engagement with mutual aid on-the-ground and online: Exploring access to grassroots support networks among a community-based cohort in Vancouver, Canada (2020–2024)\",\"authors\":\"Jennie Pearson , Andrea Krüsi , Kate Shannon , Charlie Zhou , Shira M. Goldenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Mutual aid is the practice of grassroots support based on principles of direct action and non-hierarchical cooperation, central to the health and well-being of marginalized communities including sex workers. Despite mutual aid's centrality to sex workers' well-being, there is a dearth of health research on sex workers' uptake of mutual aid, particularly digital modes, and its relationship to supportive occupational conditions. Drawing on longitudinal cohort data, we measured recent mutual aid and its association with structural and occupational conditions among 900+ sex workers in Metro Vancouver, Canada. Informed by mutual aid principles and a structural determinants framework, we examined uptake of “digital” and “on-the-ground” (i.e., in-person) mutual aid and explored associations with occupational conditions in a community-based cohort of sex workers over four years (2020–24). Among 367 sex workers, 37.2 % and 58 % reported engaging in digital and on-the-ground mutual aid, respectively. We found higher odds of utilizing “on-the-ground” mutual aid among those experiencing recent physical/sexual violence and lower odds of digital mutual aid among sex workers who experienced lifetime incarceration. The findings affirm engagement with mutual aid as a critical support model for sex workers, while highlighting barriers to emerging digital modalities. There is need for full decriminalization of sex work and the democratization of digital tools to reduce barriers to essential resources and support networks. Further, our findings underscore the potential of mutual aid principles within public health, by learning from communities who have cultivated grassroots models of care in the context of structural exclusion.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"385 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118582\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362500913X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362500913X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sex workers’ engagement with mutual aid on-the-ground and online: Exploring access to grassroots support networks among a community-based cohort in Vancouver, Canada (2020–2024)
Mutual aid is the practice of grassroots support based on principles of direct action and non-hierarchical cooperation, central to the health and well-being of marginalized communities including sex workers. Despite mutual aid's centrality to sex workers' well-being, there is a dearth of health research on sex workers' uptake of mutual aid, particularly digital modes, and its relationship to supportive occupational conditions. Drawing on longitudinal cohort data, we measured recent mutual aid and its association with structural and occupational conditions among 900+ sex workers in Metro Vancouver, Canada. Informed by mutual aid principles and a structural determinants framework, we examined uptake of “digital” and “on-the-ground” (i.e., in-person) mutual aid and explored associations with occupational conditions in a community-based cohort of sex workers over four years (2020–24). Among 367 sex workers, 37.2 % and 58 % reported engaging in digital and on-the-ground mutual aid, respectively. We found higher odds of utilizing “on-the-ground” mutual aid among those experiencing recent physical/sexual violence and lower odds of digital mutual aid among sex workers who experienced lifetime incarceration. The findings affirm engagement with mutual aid as a critical support model for sex workers, while highlighting barriers to emerging digital modalities. There is need for full decriminalization of sex work and the democratization of digital tools to reduce barriers to essential resources and support networks. Further, our findings underscore the potential of mutual aid principles within public health, by learning from communities who have cultivated grassroots models of care in the context of structural exclusion.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.