对影响加州拼车服务使用的因素的调查

IF 6.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Junia Compostella , Xiatian Iogansen , Mischa Young , Jaime Soza-Parra , Giovanni Circella , Alan Jenn
{"title":"对影响加州拼车服务使用的因素的调查","authors":"Junia Compostella ,&nbsp;Xiatian Iogansen ,&nbsp;Mischa Young ,&nbsp;Jaime Soza-Parra ,&nbsp;Giovanni Circella ,&nbsp;Alan Jenn","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pooled ridehailing services, like UberPOOL (now UberX Share) and Lyft Line (later rebranded as Lyft Shared before its discontinuation in May 2023), allow passengers to share part or the entirety of their trip with other paying passengers they typically do not know, resulting in lower fares. In this paper, we estimate a mixed logit model to examine the factors influencing the choice between pooled and solo ridehailing (e.g., UberX), using a dataset collected through <em>rMove</em>, an in-app survey and GPS data collection tool, which captures residents’ travel behaviors across three metropolitan regions in California. Our findings indicate that lower-income individuals, non-whites, women, and younger adults are more likely to choose pooled ridehailing. Conversely, individuals with higher vehicle ownership are less likely to pool. Frequent ridehailing users are more inclined to share rides, whereas employer-paid work trips are less likely to be pooled. Trips originating in high-density areas are also more likely to be pooled. Furthermore, we find a positive relationship between the use of public/active modes and the likelihood of pooling, highlighting both the risk of competition (and substitution) among these modes and an openness to multimodal travel among certain groups. Our analysis offers valuable insights for policymakers who seek to expand the share of pooled ridehailing trips while minimizing deadheading to reduce the emissions and congestion associated with the ridehailing industry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 104626"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An investigation of the factors that affect the use of pooled ridehailing services in California\",\"authors\":\"Junia Compostella ,&nbsp;Xiatian Iogansen ,&nbsp;Mischa Young ,&nbsp;Jaime Soza-Parra ,&nbsp;Giovanni Circella ,&nbsp;Alan Jenn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Pooled ridehailing services, like UberPOOL (now UberX Share) and Lyft Line (later rebranded as Lyft Shared before its discontinuation in May 2023), allow passengers to share part or the entirety of their trip with other paying passengers they typically do not know, resulting in lower fares. In this paper, we estimate a mixed logit model to examine the factors influencing the choice between pooled and solo ridehailing (e.g., UberX), using a dataset collected through <em>rMove</em>, an in-app survey and GPS data collection tool, which captures residents’ travel behaviors across three metropolitan regions in California. Our findings indicate that lower-income individuals, non-whites, women, and younger adults are more likely to choose pooled ridehailing. Conversely, individuals with higher vehicle ownership are less likely to pool. Frequent ridehailing users are more inclined to share rides, whereas employer-paid work trips are less likely to be pooled. Trips originating in high-density areas are also more likely to be pooled. Furthermore, we find a positive relationship between the use of public/active modes and the likelihood of pooling, highlighting both the risk of competition (and substitution) among these modes and an openness to multimodal travel among certain groups. Our analysis offers valuable insights for policymakers who seek to expand the share of pooled ridehailing trips while minimizing deadheading to reduce the emissions and congestion associated with the ridehailing industry.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104626\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096585642500254X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096585642500254X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

拼车服务,如UberPOOL(现在的UberX Share)和Lyft Line(后来更名为Lyft Shared,于2023年5月停止运营),允许乘客与其他他们通常不认识的付费乘客共享部分或全部行程,从而降低票价。在本文中,我们估计了一个混合logit模型来研究影响拼车和单独乘车(例如UberX)选择的因素,使用通过rMove收集的数据集,一个应用内调查和GPS数据收集工具,捕捉了加州三个大都市区居民的出行行为。我们的研究结果表明,低收入者、非白人、女性和年轻人更有可能选择拼车。相反,拥有较高车辆拥有量的人不太可能共用汽车。经常使用网约车的用户更倾向于拼车,而雇主支付的工作出行不太可能拼车。从人口密集地区出发的旅行也更有可能集中在一起。此外,我们发现公共/主动模式的使用与共享的可能性之间存在正相关关系,突出了这些模式之间的竞争(和替代)风险以及某些群体对多式联运的开放程度。我们的分析为政策制定者提供了有价值的见解,他们寻求扩大拼车出行的份额,同时最大限度地减少拥堵,以减少与拼车行业相关的排放和拥堵。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An investigation of the factors that affect the use of pooled ridehailing services in California
Pooled ridehailing services, like UberPOOL (now UberX Share) and Lyft Line (later rebranded as Lyft Shared before its discontinuation in May 2023), allow passengers to share part or the entirety of their trip with other paying passengers they typically do not know, resulting in lower fares. In this paper, we estimate a mixed logit model to examine the factors influencing the choice between pooled and solo ridehailing (e.g., UberX), using a dataset collected through rMove, an in-app survey and GPS data collection tool, which captures residents’ travel behaviors across three metropolitan regions in California. Our findings indicate that lower-income individuals, non-whites, women, and younger adults are more likely to choose pooled ridehailing. Conversely, individuals with higher vehicle ownership are less likely to pool. Frequent ridehailing users are more inclined to share rides, whereas employer-paid work trips are less likely to be pooled. Trips originating in high-density areas are also more likely to be pooled. Furthermore, we find a positive relationship between the use of public/active modes and the likelihood of pooling, highlighting both the risk of competition (and substitution) among these modes and an openness to multimodal travel among certain groups. Our analysis offers valuable insights for policymakers who seek to expand the share of pooled ridehailing trips while minimizing deadheading to reduce the emissions and congestion associated with the ridehailing industry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信