{"title":"用数据驱动的学习增强议论文写作:探索发展轨迹和学习者概况","authors":"Wenjuan Qin, Weiran Wang, Yongyan Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the effectiveness of a data-driven learning (DDL) intervention in enhancing EFL learners' argumentative writing skills. The research has two primary objectives: 1) to examine developmental trajectories of EFL learners' argumentative writing at lexical, syntactic, and organizational levels; 2) to identify distinct learner profiles that emerge based on the development of these linguistic measures. 199 EFL students participated in seven iterative cycles of argumentative writing assignments, followed by corpus-based analysis and personalized feedback. Results revealed diverse developmental paths across three linguistic levels. Three distinct learner profiles emerged: high-performing formal language users, functional language adventurers, and low-performing formal and functional language users. The findings highlight the dynamic, non-linear nature of language development and underscore the need for personalized instructional strategies and sustained support for higher-order writing skills. This study bridges research and practice gaps through an innovative researcher-practitioner partnership, providing valuable insights for optimizing DDL interventions in language education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 102800"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing argumentative writing with data-driven learning: Exploring developmental trajectories and learner profiles\",\"authors\":\"Wenjuan Qin, Weiran Wang, Yongyan Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the effectiveness of a data-driven learning (DDL) intervention in enhancing EFL learners' argumentative writing skills. The research has two primary objectives: 1) to examine developmental trajectories of EFL learners' argumentative writing at lexical, syntactic, and organizational levels; 2) to identify distinct learner profiles that emerge based on the development of these linguistic measures. 199 EFL students participated in seven iterative cycles of argumentative writing assignments, followed by corpus-based analysis and personalized feedback. Results revealed diverse developmental paths across three linguistic levels. Three distinct learner profiles emerged: high-performing formal language users, functional language adventurers, and low-performing formal and functional language users. The findings highlight the dynamic, non-linear nature of language development and underscore the need for personalized instructional strategies and sustained support for higher-order writing skills. This study bridges research and practice gaps through an innovative researcher-practitioner partnership, providing valuable insights for optimizing DDL interventions in language education.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"124 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102800\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025001761\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608025001761","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhancing argumentative writing with data-driven learning: Exploring developmental trajectories and learner profiles
This study examines the effectiveness of a data-driven learning (DDL) intervention in enhancing EFL learners' argumentative writing skills. The research has two primary objectives: 1) to examine developmental trajectories of EFL learners' argumentative writing at lexical, syntactic, and organizational levels; 2) to identify distinct learner profiles that emerge based on the development of these linguistic measures. 199 EFL students participated in seven iterative cycles of argumentative writing assignments, followed by corpus-based analysis and personalized feedback. Results revealed diverse developmental paths across three linguistic levels. Three distinct learner profiles emerged: high-performing formal language users, functional language adventurers, and low-performing formal and functional language users. The findings highlight the dynamic, non-linear nature of language development and underscore the need for personalized instructional strategies and sustained support for higher-order writing skills. This study bridges research and practice gaps through an innovative researcher-practitioner partnership, providing valuable insights for optimizing DDL interventions in language education.
期刊介绍:
Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).