混合耕作对飞蛾有益吗?探索不同的农业系统如何塑造当地特色和更广阔的景观

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Rochelle Kennedy , Elisa Fuentes-Montemayor , Kirsty J. Park , Nick Littlewood
{"title":"混合耕作对飞蛾有益吗?探索不同的农业系统如何塑造当地特色和更广阔的景观","authors":"Rochelle Kennedy ,&nbsp;Elisa Fuentes-Montemayor ,&nbsp;Kirsty J. Park ,&nbsp;Nick Littlewood","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.109996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Moths are important pollinators and provide an essential food source for higher taxa, yet many species that were once widespread are in decline across Europe. This is largely due to practices associated with intensive farming, such as pesticide and fertiliser applications and habitat loss. There is increasing interest in finding ways of farming that are beneficial to both humans and biodiversity. ‘Mixed’ farming, where livestock are integrated into the crop rotation, is thought to provide benefits to biodiversity by reducing synthetic inputs and by increasing habitat and crop diversity. However, at commercial stocking levels, livestock can have detrimental impacts on grassland Lepidoptera. We investigate the different pathways through which mixed farming could benefit moths in comparison to arable farming (where livestock are absent). Between June and August 2022, twenty-six farms in Scotland were surveyed for moths using light-trapping. Woodland edge density, which was higher on mixed farms, increased micro moth abundance and species richness. Positive effects of woodland were also observed for ‘farmland’ micro moths that do not feed on woody plants. However, for micro moth species richness this positive effect of woodland edge was outweighed by a direct negative effect of mixed farming, highlighting the need for more research to find livestock management practices that are beneficial for moths.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"396 ","pages":"Article 109996"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does mixed farming benefit moths? Exploring how different farming systems shape both local features and the wider landscape\",\"authors\":\"Rochelle Kennedy ,&nbsp;Elisa Fuentes-Montemayor ,&nbsp;Kirsty J. Park ,&nbsp;Nick Littlewood\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agee.2025.109996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Moths are important pollinators and provide an essential food source for higher taxa, yet many species that were once widespread are in decline across Europe. This is largely due to practices associated with intensive farming, such as pesticide and fertiliser applications and habitat loss. There is increasing interest in finding ways of farming that are beneficial to both humans and biodiversity. ‘Mixed’ farming, where livestock are integrated into the crop rotation, is thought to provide benefits to biodiversity by reducing synthetic inputs and by increasing habitat and crop diversity. However, at commercial stocking levels, livestock can have detrimental impacts on grassland Lepidoptera. We investigate the different pathways through which mixed farming could benefit moths in comparison to arable farming (where livestock are absent). Between June and August 2022, twenty-six farms in Scotland were surveyed for moths using light-trapping. Woodland edge density, which was higher on mixed farms, increased micro moth abundance and species richness. Positive effects of woodland were also observed for ‘farmland’ micro moths that do not feed on woody plants. However, for micro moth species richness this positive effect of woodland edge was outweighed by a direct negative effect of mixed farming, highlighting the need for more research to find livestock management practices that are beneficial for moths.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"volume\":\"396 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109996\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925005286\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925005286","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

飞蛾是重要的传粉者,为高等分类群提供重要的食物来源,然而,许多曾经广泛分布的物种在欧洲各地正在减少。这主要是由于与集约化农业有关的做法,如农药和化肥的施用以及栖息地的丧失。人们对寻找既有利于人类又有利于生物多样性的耕作方式越来越感兴趣。人们认为,将牲畜纳入轮作的“混合”农业通过减少合成投入和增加生境和作物多样性,为生物多样性带来好处。然而,在商业放养水平上,牲畜可能对草地鳞翅目产生有害影响。我们研究了与耕地耕作(没有牲畜)相比,混合耕作可以使飞蛾受益的不同途径。在2022年6月至8月期间,对苏格兰的26个农场进行了为期数月的光捕获调查。林地边缘密度越高,微蛾的丰度和物种丰富度越高。林地对不以木本植物为食的“农田”微蛾也有积极影响。然而,对于微蛾物种丰富度而言,林地边缘的这种积极影响被混合耕作的直接负面影响所抵消,这表明需要更多的研究来寻找对微蛾有益的牲畜管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does mixed farming benefit moths? Exploring how different farming systems shape both local features and the wider landscape
Moths are important pollinators and provide an essential food source for higher taxa, yet many species that were once widespread are in decline across Europe. This is largely due to practices associated with intensive farming, such as pesticide and fertiliser applications and habitat loss. There is increasing interest in finding ways of farming that are beneficial to both humans and biodiversity. ‘Mixed’ farming, where livestock are integrated into the crop rotation, is thought to provide benefits to biodiversity by reducing synthetic inputs and by increasing habitat and crop diversity. However, at commercial stocking levels, livestock can have detrimental impacts on grassland Lepidoptera. We investigate the different pathways through which mixed farming could benefit moths in comparison to arable farming (where livestock are absent). Between June and August 2022, twenty-six farms in Scotland were surveyed for moths using light-trapping. Woodland edge density, which was higher on mixed farms, increased micro moth abundance and species richness. Positive effects of woodland were also observed for ‘farmland’ micro moths that do not feed on woody plants. However, for micro moth species richness this positive effect of woodland edge was outweighed by a direct negative effect of mixed farming, highlighting the need for more research to find livestock management practices that are beneficial for moths.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信