Tian Hao , Lizhuo Zhou , Peng Hu , Tongpu Zhao , Peiqiong Wang
{"title":"从对冲到风险:气候政策不确定性对企业生物多样性风险的非线性影响","authors":"Tian Hao , Lizhuo Zhou , Peng Hu , Tongpu Zhao , Peiqiong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While climate policy uncertainty has been widely studied in relation to corporate environmental practices, its impact on biodiversity exposure remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by constructing quantitative indices of policy uncertainty and biodiversity exposure using spatial data from Chinese A-share listed firms and nature reserves from 2003 to 2023. We document an inverted U-shaped relationship: at moderate levels of uncertainty, firms tend to increase biodiversity engagement to hedge against potential regulatory risks; at higher levels, however, firms reduce ecological investments, leading to greater biodiversity exposure. Notably, strong internal governance and rigorous external regulation significantly mitigate the rise in biodiversity exposure under high uncertainty by fostering more stable and consistent environmental management. These moderating effects highlight the crucial role of governance and regulatory oversight in shaping corporate response to ecological risks. Our findings provide new empirical evidence on the behavioral dynamics of firms facing ecological risks and offer policy-relevant insights for improving environmental governance in uncertain regulatory environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 108885"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From hedge to risk: Nonlinear effects of climate policy uncertainty on corporate biodiversity exposure\",\"authors\":\"Tian Hao , Lizhuo Zhou , Peng Hu , Tongpu Zhao , Peiqiong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While climate policy uncertainty has been widely studied in relation to corporate environmental practices, its impact on biodiversity exposure remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by constructing quantitative indices of policy uncertainty and biodiversity exposure using spatial data from Chinese A-share listed firms and nature reserves from 2003 to 2023. We document an inverted U-shaped relationship: at moderate levels of uncertainty, firms tend to increase biodiversity engagement to hedge against potential regulatory risks; at higher levels, however, firms reduce ecological investments, leading to greater biodiversity exposure. Notably, strong internal governance and rigorous external regulation significantly mitigate the rise in biodiversity exposure under high uncertainty by fostering more stable and consistent environmental management. These moderating effects highlight the crucial role of governance and regulatory oversight in shaping corporate response to ecological risks. Our findings provide new empirical evidence on the behavioral dynamics of firms facing ecological risks and offer policy-relevant insights for improving environmental governance in uncertain regulatory environments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"151 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108885\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007121\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
From hedge to risk: Nonlinear effects of climate policy uncertainty on corporate biodiversity exposure
While climate policy uncertainty has been widely studied in relation to corporate environmental practices, its impact on biodiversity exposure remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by constructing quantitative indices of policy uncertainty and biodiversity exposure using spatial data from Chinese A-share listed firms and nature reserves from 2003 to 2023. We document an inverted U-shaped relationship: at moderate levels of uncertainty, firms tend to increase biodiversity engagement to hedge against potential regulatory risks; at higher levels, however, firms reduce ecological investments, leading to greater biodiversity exposure. Notably, strong internal governance and rigorous external regulation significantly mitigate the rise in biodiversity exposure under high uncertainty by fostering more stable and consistent environmental management. These moderating effects highlight the crucial role of governance and regulatory oversight in shaping corporate response to ecological risks. Our findings provide new empirical evidence on the behavioral dynamics of firms facing ecological risks and offer policy-relevant insights for improving environmental governance in uncertain regulatory environments.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.