James Conrad Pritchard , Maxwell Hire , Jeffrey McDonough , Christopher P. Higgins , Charles E. Schaefer
{"title":"基于高分辨率土壤、孔隙水和地下水采样的受afff影响的消防训练区域的PFAS概念场地模型","authors":"James Conrad Pritchard , Maxwell Hire , Jeffrey McDonough , Christopher P. Higgins , Charles E. Schaefer","doi":"10.1016/j.jconhyd.2025.104728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High spatial resolution sampling of vadose zone soil and porewater as well as near downgradient groundwater at an aqueous film forming foam (AFFF)-impacted former firefighting training area (FTA) was conducted to enable more accurate conceptual site models and mass distribution assessments of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). The total mass and distribution of all individual detectable PFASs in the source zone was determined from the compiled data set, which included 28 soil borings with multi-depth PFAS samples, 17 porous cup suction lysimeters sampled 3 times over 8 months, and 8 shallow groundwater wells sampled 3 times over 8 months. PFAS analyses consisted of both target (quantified) and suspect (semi-quantified) analytes. Results showed that PFASs varied in their vertical and horizontal distribution within the FTA, and that a majority of the zwitterionic and cationic precursors were retained in shallow soils. While perfluoroalkyl acid (PFAA) precursors comprised 61 % the PFASs in collected soil sample, PFAAs were by far the dominant PFAS class within both porewater and near downgradient groundwater (78 % and 87 %, respectively). PFAS porewater concentrations generally increased with increasing soil moisture content, and these increases were reasonably described for perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) by an equilibrium-based mass balance model that accounted for PFAS accumulation at the air-water interface and soil-water partitioning. PFAS porewater concentrations located within or adjacent to low permeability soils showed greater increases with moisture content than in porewater associated with sandy materials, likely due to the larger role of air-water interfacial area in PFAS phase distribution in these fine-grained soils. Bench-scale batch desorption tests conducted with site material reveal a significant PFAS mass that is not readily desorbed from the soil. Observed K<sub>d</sub> values measured in the field are comparable to the bench-scale data if this desorption-resistant PFAS mass is considered. These novel findings at the scale of an FTA highlight potential challenges with evaluating PFAS porewater concentrations and leaching in heterogeneous unsaturated soils.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15530,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contaminant hydrology","volume":"276 ","pages":"Article 104728"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PFAS conceptual site model of an AFFF-impacted firefighting training area informed by high resolution soil, porewater, and groundwater sampling\",\"authors\":\"James Conrad Pritchard , Maxwell Hire , Jeffrey McDonough , Christopher P. Higgins , Charles E. Schaefer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jconhyd.2025.104728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>High spatial resolution sampling of vadose zone soil and porewater as well as near downgradient groundwater at an aqueous film forming foam (AFFF)-impacted former firefighting training area (FTA) was conducted to enable more accurate conceptual site models and mass distribution assessments of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). The total mass and distribution of all individual detectable PFASs in the source zone was determined from the compiled data set, which included 28 soil borings with multi-depth PFAS samples, 17 porous cup suction lysimeters sampled 3 times over 8 months, and 8 shallow groundwater wells sampled 3 times over 8 months. PFAS analyses consisted of both target (quantified) and suspect (semi-quantified) analytes. Results showed that PFASs varied in their vertical and horizontal distribution within the FTA, and that a majority of the zwitterionic and cationic precursors were retained in shallow soils. While perfluoroalkyl acid (PFAA) precursors comprised 61 % the PFASs in collected soil sample, PFAAs were by far the dominant PFAS class within both porewater and near downgradient groundwater (78 % and 87 %, respectively). PFAS porewater concentrations generally increased with increasing soil moisture content, and these increases were reasonably described for perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) by an equilibrium-based mass balance model that accounted for PFAS accumulation at the air-water interface and soil-water partitioning. PFAS porewater concentrations located within or adjacent to low permeability soils showed greater increases with moisture content than in porewater associated with sandy materials, likely due to the larger role of air-water interfacial area in PFAS phase distribution in these fine-grained soils. Bench-scale batch desorption tests conducted with site material reveal a significant PFAS mass that is not readily desorbed from the soil. Observed K<sub>d</sub> values measured in the field are comparable to the bench-scale data if this desorption-resistant PFAS mass is considered. These novel findings at the scale of an FTA highlight potential challenges with evaluating PFAS porewater concentrations and leaching in heterogeneous unsaturated soils.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of contaminant hydrology\",\"volume\":\"276 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104728\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of contaminant hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169772225002335\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contaminant hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169772225002335","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
PFAS conceptual site model of an AFFF-impacted firefighting training area informed by high resolution soil, porewater, and groundwater sampling
High spatial resolution sampling of vadose zone soil and porewater as well as near downgradient groundwater at an aqueous film forming foam (AFFF)-impacted former firefighting training area (FTA) was conducted to enable more accurate conceptual site models and mass distribution assessments of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). The total mass and distribution of all individual detectable PFASs in the source zone was determined from the compiled data set, which included 28 soil borings with multi-depth PFAS samples, 17 porous cup suction lysimeters sampled 3 times over 8 months, and 8 shallow groundwater wells sampled 3 times over 8 months. PFAS analyses consisted of both target (quantified) and suspect (semi-quantified) analytes. Results showed that PFASs varied in their vertical and horizontal distribution within the FTA, and that a majority of the zwitterionic and cationic precursors were retained in shallow soils. While perfluoroalkyl acid (PFAA) precursors comprised 61 % the PFASs in collected soil sample, PFAAs were by far the dominant PFAS class within both porewater and near downgradient groundwater (78 % and 87 %, respectively). PFAS porewater concentrations generally increased with increasing soil moisture content, and these increases were reasonably described for perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) by an equilibrium-based mass balance model that accounted for PFAS accumulation at the air-water interface and soil-water partitioning. PFAS porewater concentrations located within or adjacent to low permeability soils showed greater increases with moisture content than in porewater associated with sandy materials, likely due to the larger role of air-water interfacial area in PFAS phase distribution in these fine-grained soils. Bench-scale batch desorption tests conducted with site material reveal a significant PFAS mass that is not readily desorbed from the soil. Observed Kd values measured in the field are comparable to the bench-scale data if this desorption-resistant PFAS mass is considered. These novel findings at the scale of an FTA highlight potential challenges with evaluating PFAS porewater concentrations and leaching in heterogeneous unsaturated soils.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Contaminant Hydrology is an international journal publishing scientific articles pertaining to the contamination of subsurface water resources. Emphasis is placed on investigations of the physical, chemical, and biological processes influencing the behavior and fate of organic and inorganic contaminants in the unsaturated (vadose) and saturated (groundwater) zones, as well as at groundwater-surface water interfaces. The ecological impacts of contaminants transported both from and to aquifers are of interest. Articles on contamination of surface water only, without a link to groundwater, are out of the scope. Broad latitude is allowed in identifying contaminants of interest, and include legacy and emerging pollutants, nutrients, nanoparticles, pathogenic microorganisms (e.g., bacteria, viruses, protozoa), microplastics, and various constituents associated with energy production (e.g., methane, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide).
The journal''s scope embraces a wide range of topics including: experimental investigations of contaminant sorption, diffusion, transformation, volatilization and transport in the surface and subsurface; characterization of soil and aquifer properties only as they influence contaminant behavior; development and testing of mathematical models of contaminant behaviour; innovative techniques for restoration of contaminated sites; development of new tools or techniques for monitoring the extent of soil and groundwater contamination; transformation of contaminants in the hyporheic zone; effects of contaminants traversing the hyporheic zone on surface water and groundwater ecosystems; subsurface carbon sequestration and/or turnover; and migration of fluids associated with energy production into groundwater.