Xue Tian , Zejin Liu , Yucheng Zhang , Shiyi Guo , Yunhan Wang
{"title":"水鸟多样性作为识别长江流域重要生境的指标","authors":"Xue Tian , Zejin Liu , Yucheng Zhang , Shiyi Guo , Yunhan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Large human-modified river basins require biologically meaningful yet operational indicators to locate key habitats and guide protection. The Yangtze River Basin (YRB), as the world’s third longest river and a core inland segment of the East Asian-Australasian Flyway, exemplifies a highly heterogeneous socio-ecological system where rapid, uneven urbanization intersects steep climatic and hydrological gradients. Drawing on 26,429 citizen‑science waterbird observation reports (2007–2021), we found a spatiotemporal divergence in environmental factors affecting waterbird diversity across urban versus non-urban areas and between breeding and wintering seasons. Specifically, waterbird diversity is driven mainly by disturbance and fine-scale site conditions in urban areas but by a broader environmental suite in non‑urban areas. We also found that currently designated protected areas (PAs) only covered most of the key habitats in non‑urban areas during breeding season. Thus, we proposed a spatially stratified framework to identify key habitats that distinguishes urban and non‑urban areas for waterbirds. Connectivity modeling based on these key habitats identified corridors bridging urban and non‑urban wetland complexes and highlighted unprotected linkage bottlenecks. Integrating the revealed spatial and seasonal driver contrasts with diversity hotspots, focal species distributions, and connectivity outputs, we propose a stratified multi‑indicator framework that operationalizes waterbird diversity as a habitat network design tool to guide targeted protected areas expansion and ecological corridor planning in large human‑modified river basins.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 114230"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Waterbird diversity as an indicator for identifying key habitats in the Yangtze River Basin\",\"authors\":\"Xue Tian , Zejin Liu , Yucheng Zhang , Shiyi Guo , Yunhan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Large human-modified river basins require biologically meaningful yet operational indicators to locate key habitats and guide protection. The Yangtze River Basin (YRB), as the world’s third longest river and a core inland segment of the East Asian-Australasian Flyway, exemplifies a highly heterogeneous socio-ecological system where rapid, uneven urbanization intersects steep climatic and hydrological gradients. Drawing on 26,429 citizen‑science waterbird observation reports (2007–2021), we found a spatiotemporal divergence in environmental factors affecting waterbird diversity across urban versus non-urban areas and between breeding and wintering seasons. Specifically, waterbird diversity is driven mainly by disturbance and fine-scale site conditions in urban areas but by a broader environmental suite in non‑urban areas. We also found that currently designated protected areas (PAs) only covered most of the key habitats in non‑urban areas during breeding season. Thus, we proposed a spatially stratified framework to identify key habitats that distinguishes urban and non‑urban areas for waterbirds. Connectivity modeling based on these key habitats identified corridors bridging urban and non‑urban wetland complexes and highlighted unprotected linkage bottlenecks. Integrating the revealed spatial and seasonal driver contrasts with diversity hotspots, focal species distributions, and connectivity outputs, we propose a stratified multi‑indicator framework that operationalizes waterbird diversity as a habitat network design tool to guide targeted protected areas expansion and ecological corridor planning in large human‑modified river basins.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"179 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25011628\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25011628","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Waterbird diversity as an indicator for identifying key habitats in the Yangtze River Basin
Large human-modified river basins require biologically meaningful yet operational indicators to locate key habitats and guide protection. The Yangtze River Basin (YRB), as the world’s third longest river and a core inland segment of the East Asian-Australasian Flyway, exemplifies a highly heterogeneous socio-ecological system where rapid, uneven urbanization intersects steep climatic and hydrological gradients. Drawing on 26,429 citizen‑science waterbird observation reports (2007–2021), we found a spatiotemporal divergence in environmental factors affecting waterbird diversity across urban versus non-urban areas and between breeding and wintering seasons. Specifically, waterbird diversity is driven mainly by disturbance and fine-scale site conditions in urban areas but by a broader environmental suite in non‑urban areas. We also found that currently designated protected areas (PAs) only covered most of the key habitats in non‑urban areas during breeding season. Thus, we proposed a spatially stratified framework to identify key habitats that distinguishes urban and non‑urban areas for waterbirds. Connectivity modeling based on these key habitats identified corridors bridging urban and non‑urban wetland complexes and highlighted unprotected linkage bottlenecks. Integrating the revealed spatial and seasonal driver contrasts with diversity hotspots, focal species distributions, and connectivity outputs, we propose a stratified multi‑indicator framework that operationalizes waterbird diversity as a habitat network design tool to guide targeted protected areas expansion and ecological corridor planning in large human‑modified river basins.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.