Tennessee Randall , Louise Neilson , Menna Price , Charlotte A. Hardman , Laura L. Wilkinson
{"title":"内脏不是那么可怕吗?期望产品特性对杂类食品接受度的中介作用的探索","authors":"Tennessee Randall , Louise Neilson , Menna Price , Charlotte A. Hardman , Laura L. Wilkinson","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Offal is a nutritious food source that has been identified in having a role to play in improving the environmental sustainability of meat. However, current research has not identified how offal can be more acceptable to UK consumers. This study aimed to examine whether acceptance improved when offal was combined with more familiar meat cuts within an uncooked product (i.e., offal-enriched minced meat). Furthermore, acceptance of cooked offal-enriched meals (e.g., spaghetti bolognese with beef mince and liver) were explored in a path model that focused on the interaction between psychological characteristics and expected product characteristics. In an online survey with UK meat eaters (<em>N</em> = 390), expected product characteristics and acceptance were measured in response to images and descriptions of hypothetical uncooked meat products and cooked meals. As expected, offal-enriched minced meat was more acceptable than offal in its typical form. The mediation analysis showed that the relationship between health motives and acceptance of offal-enriched meals was partially mediated by expected taste and curiosity. Also, the relationship between food neophobia and acceptance was completely mediated by familiarity, expected taste and curiosity. Finally, the relationship between impression management and acceptance was completely mediated by curiosity and expected taste. The results highlight a potential pathway for the inclusion of offal into the UK diet, particularly for male consumers. To convert curiosity into regular consumption, it is essential that the initial experience with offal is enjoyable and not deemed abnormal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 105710"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surely offal isn't that awful? An exploration of the mediating effect of expected product characteristics on the acceptance of offal-enriched foods\",\"authors\":\"Tennessee Randall , Louise Neilson , Menna Price , Charlotte A. Hardman , Laura L. Wilkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Offal is a nutritious food source that has been identified in having a role to play in improving the environmental sustainability of meat. However, current research has not identified how offal can be more acceptable to UK consumers. This study aimed to examine whether acceptance improved when offal was combined with more familiar meat cuts within an uncooked product (i.e., offal-enriched minced meat). Furthermore, acceptance of cooked offal-enriched meals (e.g., spaghetti bolognese with beef mince and liver) were explored in a path model that focused on the interaction between psychological characteristics and expected product characteristics. In an online survey with UK meat eaters (<em>N</em> = 390), expected product characteristics and acceptance were measured in response to images and descriptions of hypothetical uncooked meat products and cooked meals. As expected, offal-enriched minced meat was more acceptable than offal in its typical form. The mediation analysis showed that the relationship between health motives and acceptance of offal-enriched meals was partially mediated by expected taste and curiosity. Also, the relationship between food neophobia and acceptance was completely mediated by familiarity, expected taste and curiosity. Finally, the relationship between impression management and acceptance was completely mediated by curiosity and expected taste. The results highlight a potential pathway for the inclusion of offal into the UK diet, particularly for male consumers. To convert curiosity into regular consumption, it is essential that the initial experience with offal is enjoyable and not deemed abnormal.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"volume\":\"135 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105710\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095032932500285X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095032932500285X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Surely offal isn't that awful? An exploration of the mediating effect of expected product characteristics on the acceptance of offal-enriched foods
Offal is a nutritious food source that has been identified in having a role to play in improving the environmental sustainability of meat. However, current research has not identified how offal can be more acceptable to UK consumers. This study aimed to examine whether acceptance improved when offal was combined with more familiar meat cuts within an uncooked product (i.e., offal-enriched minced meat). Furthermore, acceptance of cooked offal-enriched meals (e.g., spaghetti bolognese with beef mince and liver) were explored in a path model that focused on the interaction between psychological characteristics and expected product characteristics. In an online survey with UK meat eaters (N = 390), expected product characteristics and acceptance were measured in response to images and descriptions of hypothetical uncooked meat products and cooked meals. As expected, offal-enriched minced meat was more acceptable than offal in its typical form. The mediation analysis showed that the relationship between health motives and acceptance of offal-enriched meals was partially mediated by expected taste and curiosity. Also, the relationship between food neophobia and acceptance was completely mediated by familiarity, expected taste and curiosity. Finally, the relationship between impression management and acceptance was completely mediated by curiosity and expected taste. The results highlight a potential pathway for the inclusion of offal into the UK diet, particularly for male consumers. To convert curiosity into regular consumption, it is essential that the initial experience with offal is enjoyable and not deemed abnormal.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.