BBNJ谈判中的拉丁美洲核心成员:南方对海洋制度规则制定影响的一个案例

IF 3.7 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Parthenay Kevin , Carina C. de Oliveira , Ana Flávia Barros-Platiau
{"title":"BBNJ谈判中的拉丁美洲核心成员:南方对海洋制度规则制定影响的一个案例","authors":"Parthenay Kevin ,&nbsp;Carina C. de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Ana Flávia Barros-Platiau","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The legally binding International Agreement on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biodiversity Beyond Areas of National Jurisdiction (known as the “BBNJ Agreement”) is the result of almost twenty years of a multilateral debates (2004–2023). This treaty-making process has revealed, as with many others, the complex relationships between the Global North and Global South, and between Southern States. For the duration of the last Intergovernmental Conferences for the BBNJ agreement (IGC, 2019–2023), Latin America States have become closer, and have exerted rule-making influence in this multilateral process. Some Latin American States (LAS) quickly formed an <em>ad hoc</em> coalition called “Core Latin American Members” (CLAM), which played a decisive role in developing diplomatic strategies of rule entrepreneurship. How has CLAM been influential in the multilateral negotiation of the BBNJ Agreement and for what outcomes? To answer this question, the article will explore two dimensions: first, how this <em>ad hoc</em> coalition was created and how it has operated during the negotiations, including its alignment with other groups; second, what has been the CLAM’s rule-making contribution in the agreement-making process. To carry out the empirical examination, the article used a wide range of qualitative methods, from participant observation (in the IGC 4 and 5) to digital observation (IGC 1–5bis), from semi-structured interviews (with delegates and CLAM members) to process-tracing based on official negotiation documents. This article will contribute to understanding the strategic and relevant continent’s role in the BBNJ negotiations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 106920"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Core Latin American Members (CLAM) in BBNJ negotiations: A case of rule-making influence from the South on the ocean regime\",\"authors\":\"Parthenay Kevin ,&nbsp;Carina C. de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Ana Flávia Barros-Platiau\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The legally binding International Agreement on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biodiversity Beyond Areas of National Jurisdiction (known as the “BBNJ Agreement”) is the result of almost twenty years of a multilateral debates (2004–2023). This treaty-making process has revealed, as with many others, the complex relationships between the Global North and Global South, and between Southern States. For the duration of the last Intergovernmental Conferences for the BBNJ agreement (IGC, 2019–2023), Latin America States have become closer, and have exerted rule-making influence in this multilateral process. Some Latin American States (LAS) quickly formed an <em>ad hoc</em> coalition called “Core Latin American Members” (CLAM), which played a decisive role in developing diplomatic strategies of rule entrepreneurship. How has CLAM been influential in the multilateral negotiation of the BBNJ Agreement and for what outcomes? To answer this question, the article will explore two dimensions: first, how this <em>ad hoc</em> coalition was created and how it has operated during the negotiations, including its alignment with other groups; second, what has been the CLAM’s rule-making contribution in the agreement-making process. To carry out the empirical examination, the article used a wide range of qualitative methods, from participant observation (in the IGC 4 and 5) to digital observation (IGC 1–5bis), from semi-structured interviews (with delegates and CLAM members) to process-tracing based on official negotiation documents. This article will contribute to understanding the strategic and relevant continent’s role in the BBNJ negotiations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Policy\",\"volume\":\"183 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106920\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25003367\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25003367","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

具有法律约束力的《保护和可持续利用国家管辖区域以外海洋生物多样性国际协定》(简称“BBNJ协定”)是近二十年(2004-2023年)多边辩论的结果。这一条约制定进程同许多其他进程一样,揭示了全球北方和全球南方之间以及南方国家之间的复杂关系。在上一届bbj协定政府间会议期间(IGC, 2019-2023年),拉丁美洲国家变得更加紧密,并在这一多边进程中发挥了规则制定影响。一些拉丁美洲国家迅速组成了一个名为“拉丁美洲核心成员”(CLAM)的特设联盟,在制定规则创业外交战略方面发挥了决定性作用。蛤蚌委员会在BBNJ协定的多边谈判中发挥了怎样的影响,取得了什么成果?为了回答这个问题,本文将探讨两个方面:首先,这个特别联盟是如何创建的,以及它在谈判期间是如何运作的,包括它与其他团体的结盟;第二,CLAM在协议制定过程中的规则制定贡献。为了进行实证检验,本文使用了广泛的定性方法,从参与者观察(在IGC 4和5中)到数字观察(IGC 1-5bis),从半结构化访谈(与代表和CLAM成员)到基于官方谈判文件的过程追踪。这篇文章将有助于理解战略和相关大陆在BBNJ谈判中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Core Latin American Members (CLAM) in BBNJ negotiations: A case of rule-making influence from the South on the ocean regime
The legally binding International Agreement on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biodiversity Beyond Areas of National Jurisdiction (known as the “BBNJ Agreement”) is the result of almost twenty years of a multilateral debates (2004–2023). This treaty-making process has revealed, as with many others, the complex relationships between the Global North and Global South, and between Southern States. For the duration of the last Intergovernmental Conferences for the BBNJ agreement (IGC, 2019–2023), Latin America States have become closer, and have exerted rule-making influence in this multilateral process. Some Latin American States (LAS) quickly formed an ad hoc coalition called “Core Latin American Members” (CLAM), which played a decisive role in developing diplomatic strategies of rule entrepreneurship. How has CLAM been influential in the multilateral negotiation of the BBNJ Agreement and for what outcomes? To answer this question, the article will explore two dimensions: first, how this ad hoc coalition was created and how it has operated during the negotiations, including its alignment with other groups; second, what has been the CLAM’s rule-making contribution in the agreement-making process. To carry out the empirical examination, the article used a wide range of qualitative methods, from participant observation (in the IGC 4 and 5) to digital observation (IGC 1–5bis), from semi-structured interviews (with delegates and CLAM members) to process-tracing based on official negotiation documents. This article will contribute to understanding the strategic and relevant continent’s role in the BBNJ negotiations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marine Policy
Marine Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
428
期刊介绍: Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信