Parthenay Kevin , Carina C. de Oliveira , Ana Flávia Barros-Platiau
{"title":"BBNJ谈判中的拉丁美洲核心成员:南方对海洋制度规则制定影响的一个案例","authors":"Parthenay Kevin , Carina C. de Oliveira , Ana Flávia Barros-Platiau","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The legally binding International Agreement on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biodiversity Beyond Areas of National Jurisdiction (known as the “BBNJ Agreement”) is the result of almost twenty years of a multilateral debates (2004–2023). This treaty-making process has revealed, as with many others, the complex relationships between the Global North and Global South, and between Southern States. For the duration of the last Intergovernmental Conferences for the BBNJ agreement (IGC, 2019–2023), Latin America States have become closer, and have exerted rule-making influence in this multilateral process. Some Latin American States (LAS) quickly formed an <em>ad hoc</em> coalition called “Core Latin American Members” (CLAM), which played a decisive role in developing diplomatic strategies of rule entrepreneurship. How has CLAM been influential in the multilateral negotiation of the BBNJ Agreement and for what outcomes? To answer this question, the article will explore two dimensions: first, how this <em>ad hoc</em> coalition was created and how it has operated during the negotiations, including its alignment with other groups; second, what has been the CLAM’s rule-making contribution in the agreement-making process. To carry out the empirical examination, the article used a wide range of qualitative methods, from participant observation (in the IGC 4 and 5) to digital observation (IGC 1–5bis), from semi-structured interviews (with delegates and CLAM members) to process-tracing based on official negotiation documents. This article will contribute to understanding the strategic and relevant continent’s role in the BBNJ negotiations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 106920"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Core Latin American Members (CLAM) in BBNJ negotiations: A case of rule-making influence from the South on the ocean regime\",\"authors\":\"Parthenay Kevin , Carina C. de Oliveira , Ana Flávia Barros-Platiau\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The legally binding International Agreement on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biodiversity Beyond Areas of National Jurisdiction (known as the “BBNJ Agreement”) is the result of almost twenty years of a multilateral debates (2004–2023). This treaty-making process has revealed, as with many others, the complex relationships between the Global North and Global South, and between Southern States. For the duration of the last Intergovernmental Conferences for the BBNJ agreement (IGC, 2019–2023), Latin America States have become closer, and have exerted rule-making influence in this multilateral process. Some Latin American States (LAS) quickly formed an <em>ad hoc</em> coalition called “Core Latin American Members” (CLAM), which played a decisive role in developing diplomatic strategies of rule entrepreneurship. How has CLAM been influential in the multilateral negotiation of the BBNJ Agreement and for what outcomes? To answer this question, the article will explore two dimensions: first, how this <em>ad hoc</em> coalition was created and how it has operated during the negotiations, including its alignment with other groups; second, what has been the CLAM’s rule-making contribution in the agreement-making process. To carry out the empirical examination, the article used a wide range of qualitative methods, from participant observation (in the IGC 4 and 5) to digital observation (IGC 1–5bis), from semi-structured interviews (with delegates and CLAM members) to process-tracing based on official negotiation documents. This article will contribute to understanding the strategic and relevant continent’s role in the BBNJ negotiations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Policy\",\"volume\":\"183 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106920\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25003367\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25003367","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Core Latin American Members (CLAM) in BBNJ negotiations: A case of rule-making influence from the South on the ocean regime
The legally binding International Agreement on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biodiversity Beyond Areas of National Jurisdiction (known as the “BBNJ Agreement”) is the result of almost twenty years of a multilateral debates (2004–2023). This treaty-making process has revealed, as with many others, the complex relationships between the Global North and Global South, and between Southern States. For the duration of the last Intergovernmental Conferences for the BBNJ agreement (IGC, 2019–2023), Latin America States have become closer, and have exerted rule-making influence in this multilateral process. Some Latin American States (LAS) quickly formed an ad hoc coalition called “Core Latin American Members” (CLAM), which played a decisive role in developing diplomatic strategies of rule entrepreneurship. How has CLAM been influential in the multilateral negotiation of the BBNJ Agreement and for what outcomes? To answer this question, the article will explore two dimensions: first, how this ad hoc coalition was created and how it has operated during the negotiations, including its alignment with other groups; second, what has been the CLAM’s rule-making contribution in the agreement-making process. To carry out the empirical examination, the article used a wide range of qualitative methods, from participant observation (in the IGC 4 and 5) to digital observation (IGC 1–5bis), from semi-structured interviews (with delegates and CLAM members) to process-tracing based on official negotiation documents. This article will contribute to understanding the strategic and relevant continent’s role in the BBNJ negotiations.
期刊介绍:
Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.