{"title":"鱼类病原体盔甲:鱼类细菌病原体中噬菌体防御系统的研究进展","authors":"Kaushika Olymon , Nafeesah Kinoo , Nitul Roy , Venkata Rajesh Yella , Valentina Teronpi , Aditya Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.aquaculture.2025.743192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bacterial diseases remain a major bottleneck to sustainable aquaculture, and interest in bacteriophage (phage) therapy has surged accordingly. However, the efficacy and durability of phage interventions are constrained by the range of chromosomally encoded antiphage defense systems in fish-pathogenic bacteria. Here, we survey publicly available genomes to establish an aquaculture-centric landscape of these defenses and their implications for therapeutic design. Across 272 genomes representing 35 fish-pathogenic species, we identified 1,174 antiphage defense systems spanning 304 distinct defense types (e.g., CRISPR-Cas, restriction-modification, DISARM, BREX, CBASS). Core systems (restriction–modification and CRISPR-Cas) are widespread, while emerging systems show patchy, lineage-specific distributions. Genomic context analysis reveals frequent clustering into defense “islands” and recurrent co-occurrence patterns, suggesting modular acquisition and potential redundancy. To translate these findings, we compile a curated crosswalk of defense types versus known phage countermeasures (anti-CRISPRs, DNA mimic proteins, anti-CBASS factors, and others) and critically appraise evidence for phage therapy from laboratory to farm settings in aquaculture species. Together, these results (i) delineate defense repertoires most likely to impede single-phage treatments, (ii) highlight taxa where cocktail rotation or engineered anti-defense traits may be necessary, and (iii) provide a practical decision framework for candidate selection, monitoring, and stewardship. This study delivers a consolidated resource and actionable guidance for rational phage development and deployment against fish-pathogenic bacteria, supporting more resilient, evidence-based disease control in aquaculture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8375,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture","volume":"612 ","pages":"Article 743192"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fish pathogen armor: A review of antiphage defense systems in bacterial fish pathogens\",\"authors\":\"Kaushika Olymon , Nafeesah Kinoo , Nitul Roy , Venkata Rajesh Yella , Valentina Teronpi , Aditya Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aquaculture.2025.743192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Bacterial diseases remain a major bottleneck to sustainable aquaculture, and interest in bacteriophage (phage) therapy has surged accordingly. However, the efficacy and durability of phage interventions are constrained by the range of chromosomally encoded antiphage defense systems in fish-pathogenic bacteria. Here, we survey publicly available genomes to establish an aquaculture-centric landscape of these defenses and their implications for therapeutic design. Across 272 genomes representing 35 fish-pathogenic species, we identified 1,174 antiphage defense systems spanning 304 distinct defense types (e.g., CRISPR-Cas, restriction-modification, DISARM, BREX, CBASS). Core systems (restriction–modification and CRISPR-Cas) are widespread, while emerging systems show patchy, lineage-specific distributions. Genomic context analysis reveals frequent clustering into defense “islands” and recurrent co-occurrence patterns, suggesting modular acquisition and potential redundancy. To translate these findings, we compile a curated crosswalk of defense types versus known phage countermeasures (anti-CRISPRs, DNA mimic proteins, anti-CBASS factors, and others) and critically appraise evidence for phage therapy from laboratory to farm settings in aquaculture species. Together, these results (i) delineate defense repertoires most likely to impede single-phage treatments, (ii) highlight taxa where cocktail rotation or engineered anti-defense traits may be necessary, and (iii) provide a practical decision framework for candidate selection, monitoring, and stewardship. This study delivers a consolidated resource and actionable guidance for rational phage development and deployment against fish-pathogenic bacteria, supporting more resilient, evidence-based disease control in aquaculture.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aquaculture\",\"volume\":\"612 \",\"pages\":\"Article 743192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aquaculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0044848625010786\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0044848625010786","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fish pathogen armor: A review of antiphage defense systems in bacterial fish pathogens
Bacterial diseases remain a major bottleneck to sustainable aquaculture, and interest in bacteriophage (phage) therapy has surged accordingly. However, the efficacy and durability of phage interventions are constrained by the range of chromosomally encoded antiphage defense systems in fish-pathogenic bacteria. Here, we survey publicly available genomes to establish an aquaculture-centric landscape of these defenses and their implications for therapeutic design. Across 272 genomes representing 35 fish-pathogenic species, we identified 1,174 antiphage defense systems spanning 304 distinct defense types (e.g., CRISPR-Cas, restriction-modification, DISARM, BREX, CBASS). Core systems (restriction–modification and CRISPR-Cas) are widespread, while emerging systems show patchy, lineage-specific distributions. Genomic context analysis reveals frequent clustering into defense “islands” and recurrent co-occurrence patterns, suggesting modular acquisition and potential redundancy. To translate these findings, we compile a curated crosswalk of defense types versus known phage countermeasures (anti-CRISPRs, DNA mimic proteins, anti-CBASS factors, and others) and critically appraise evidence for phage therapy from laboratory to farm settings in aquaculture species. Together, these results (i) delineate defense repertoires most likely to impede single-phage treatments, (ii) highlight taxa where cocktail rotation or engineered anti-defense traits may be necessary, and (iii) provide a practical decision framework for candidate selection, monitoring, and stewardship. This study delivers a consolidated resource and actionable guidance for rational phage development and deployment against fish-pathogenic bacteria, supporting more resilient, evidence-based disease control in aquaculture.
期刊介绍:
Aquaculture is an international journal for the exploration, improvement and management of all freshwater and marine food resources. It publishes novel and innovative research of world-wide interest on farming of aquatic organisms, which includes finfish, mollusks, crustaceans and aquatic plants for human consumption. Research on ornamentals is not a focus of the Journal. Aquaculture only publishes papers with a clear relevance to improving aquaculture practices or a potential application.