考虑需求响应和能量存储的混合能源脱碳系统的最优规模

IF 7.6 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Mohammad Reza Maghami , Jagadeesh Pasupuleti , Mohamed Mazlan , Janaka Ekanayake
{"title":"考虑需求响应和能量存储的混合能源脱碳系统的最优规模","authors":"Mohammad Reza Maghami ,&nbsp;Jagadeesh Pasupuleti ,&nbsp;Mohamed Mazlan ,&nbsp;Janaka Ekanayake","doi":"10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Designing cost-effective and low-emission Hybrid Energy Systems (HES) for off-grid rural areas requires not only optimal sizing but also a strong understanding of how key parameters impact system performance. In this study, sensitivity analysis is a central component, used to evaluate the effects of varying capital costs, battery capacity, Demand Response (DR) parameters, Diesel Generator (DG) size, and Renewable Energy Fraction (REF) on both economic and environmental outcomes. This approach ensures that the most robust and resilient configuration is identified under changing technical and financial conditions. A rural village in South Khorasan, Iran, with a daily load demand of 68 kWh, was selected as the case study. Four system configurations were simulated using HOMER Pro and MATLAB: (1) base HES, (2) HES with DR, (3) HES with DG, and (4) HES with both DR and DG. The results show that Scenario 4 (HES + DR + DG) provided the best performance. It reduced the Cost of Energy (COE) by 17 % (from $0.392/kWh to $0.328/kWh) and the Net Present Cost (NPC) by 16 % (from $124,780 to $104,706). The system achieved an 88 % RF, while DG operation was limited to 1831 h per year with 1108 L of fuel consumed. DR implementation also reduced battery size requirements by 37 %. This study demonstrates that integrating DR and DG, guided by detailed sensitivity analysis, leads to an optimized, low-emission, and cost-efficient HES suitable for rural electrification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37131,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management-X","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 101250"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal sizing of hybrid energy systems for decarbonization considering demand response and energy storage\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Reza Maghami ,&nbsp;Jagadeesh Pasupuleti ,&nbsp;Mohamed Mazlan ,&nbsp;Janaka Ekanayake\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Designing cost-effective and low-emission Hybrid Energy Systems (HES) for off-grid rural areas requires not only optimal sizing but also a strong understanding of how key parameters impact system performance. In this study, sensitivity analysis is a central component, used to evaluate the effects of varying capital costs, battery capacity, Demand Response (DR) parameters, Diesel Generator (DG) size, and Renewable Energy Fraction (REF) on both economic and environmental outcomes. This approach ensures that the most robust and resilient configuration is identified under changing technical and financial conditions. A rural village in South Khorasan, Iran, with a daily load demand of 68 kWh, was selected as the case study. Four system configurations were simulated using HOMER Pro and MATLAB: (1) base HES, (2) HES with DR, (3) HES with DG, and (4) HES with both DR and DG. The results show that Scenario 4 (HES + DR + DG) provided the best performance. It reduced the Cost of Energy (COE) by 17 % (from $0.392/kWh to $0.328/kWh) and the Net Present Cost (NPC) by 16 % (from $124,780 to $104,706). The system achieved an 88 % RF, while DG operation was limited to 1831 h per year with 1108 L of fuel consumed. DR implementation also reduced battery size requirements by 37 %. This study demonstrates that integrating DR and DG, guided by detailed sensitivity analysis, leads to an optimized, low-emission, and cost-efficient HES suitable for rural electrification.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Conversion and Management-X\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Conversion and Management-X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174525003824\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management-X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174525003824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为离网农村地区设计具有成本效益和低排放的混合能源系统(HES)不仅需要优化规模,还需要深入了解关键参数如何影响系统性能。在本研究中,敏感性分析是一个核心组成部分,用于评估不同资本成本、电池容量、需求响应(DR)参数、柴油发电机(DG)尺寸和可再生能源比例(REF)对经济和环境结果的影响。这种方法确保在不断变化的技术和财务条件下确定最稳健和最具弹性的配置。伊朗南呼罗珊的一个农村,其日负荷需求为68千瓦时,被选为案例研究。利用HOMER Pro和MATLAB仿真了四种系统配置:(1)基HES、(2)HES与DR、(3)HES与DG、(4)HES与DR和DG同时存在。结果表明,场景4 (HES + DR + DG)的性能最佳。它将能源成本(COE)降低了17% %(从0.392美元/千瓦时降至0.328美元/千瓦时),净现值成本(NPC)降低了16% %(从124,780美元降至104,706美元)。该系统实现了88% %的RF,而DG操作限制在每年1831 小时,燃料消耗为1108 L。DR的实施也将电池尺寸要求降低了37% %。本研究表明,在详细敏感性分析的指导下,将DR和DG整合在一起,可以产生适合农村电气化的优化、低排放和成本效益高的HES。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal sizing of hybrid energy systems for decarbonization considering demand response and energy storage
Designing cost-effective and low-emission Hybrid Energy Systems (HES) for off-grid rural areas requires not only optimal sizing but also a strong understanding of how key parameters impact system performance. In this study, sensitivity analysis is a central component, used to evaluate the effects of varying capital costs, battery capacity, Demand Response (DR) parameters, Diesel Generator (DG) size, and Renewable Energy Fraction (REF) on both economic and environmental outcomes. This approach ensures that the most robust and resilient configuration is identified under changing technical and financial conditions. A rural village in South Khorasan, Iran, with a daily load demand of 68 kWh, was selected as the case study. Four system configurations were simulated using HOMER Pro and MATLAB: (1) base HES, (2) HES with DR, (3) HES with DG, and (4) HES with both DR and DG. The results show that Scenario 4 (HES + DR + DG) provided the best performance. It reduced the Cost of Energy (COE) by 17 % (from $0.392/kWh to $0.328/kWh) and the Net Present Cost (NPC) by 16 % (from $124,780 to $104,706). The system achieved an 88 % RF, while DG operation was limited to 1831 h per year with 1108 L of fuel consumed. DR implementation also reduced battery size requirements by 37 %. This study demonstrates that integrating DR and DG, guided by detailed sensitivity analysis, leads to an optimized, low-emission, and cost-efficient HES suitable for rural electrification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
180
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Energy Conversion and Management: X is the open access extension of the reputable journal Energy Conversion and Management, serving as a platform for interdisciplinary research on a wide array of critical energy subjects. The journal is dedicated to publishing original contributions and in-depth technical review articles that present groundbreaking research on topics spanning energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management, and sustainability. The scope of Energy Conversion and Management: X encompasses various forms of energy, including mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic, and electric energy. It addresses all known energy resources, highlighting both conventional sources like fossil fuels and nuclear power, as well as renewable resources such as solar, biomass, hydro, wind, geothermal, and ocean energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信