量化典型环境因素对油库火灾爆炸风险的影响

IF 4.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Ye Song , Shuai Zhang , Qichang Dong , Zhongyu Zheng , Zihao Song , Hui Yang , Yan Wang , Long Shi
{"title":"量化典型环境因素对油库火灾爆炸风险的影响","authors":"Ye Song ,&nbsp;Shuai Zhang ,&nbsp;Qichang Dong ,&nbsp;Zhongyu Zheng ,&nbsp;Zihao Song ,&nbsp;Hui Yang ,&nbsp;Yan Wang ,&nbsp;Long Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate change poses new requirements for fire risk assessment, necessitating methods to quantify the impacts of environmental factors. As a high fire and explosion risk place, crude oil depot, typically exposed to open air, is highly susceptible to such factors. However, conventional risk assessment frameworks usually overlook the quantitative characterization of environmental factors' impacts. Furthermore, existing single-method frameworks are generally inadequate for quantitatively capturing complex and dynamic relationships between environmental factors and risk levels. In response, this study developed a risk assessment method that enabled the quantification of typical environmental factors’ impacts on oil depot fire and explosion risk. Specifically, the method quantified impacts through these pathways that are air temperature-driven, increasing human error probabilities and relative humidity-dependent electrostatic sparks events. To achieve this, the method synergistically combined fault tree analysis, cloud model theory, and information diffusion technique. The results indicated that oil depot fire and explosion risk exhibited a parabolic curve opening upward against air temperature, reaching its minimum at 20 °C. In contrast, the risk decreased monotonically with increasing relative humidity. It was also known that the impacts of relative humidity were relatively much smaller than those from the air temperature, which can be ignored during the analysis of oil depot fire and explosion risk. In practical application, the assessment results support the development of a predictive risk chart, facilitating real-time risk forecasting and enabling customization based on regional climatic conditions. Under the background of climate change, the developed method fulfills the critical demand for reliable risk assessment under evolving weather conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 105800"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying the impacts of typical environmental factors on oil depot fire and explosion risk\",\"authors\":\"Ye Song ,&nbsp;Shuai Zhang ,&nbsp;Qichang Dong ,&nbsp;Zhongyu Zheng ,&nbsp;Zihao Song ,&nbsp;Hui Yang ,&nbsp;Yan Wang ,&nbsp;Long Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Climate change poses new requirements for fire risk assessment, necessitating methods to quantify the impacts of environmental factors. As a high fire and explosion risk place, crude oil depot, typically exposed to open air, is highly susceptible to such factors. However, conventional risk assessment frameworks usually overlook the quantitative characterization of environmental factors' impacts. Furthermore, existing single-method frameworks are generally inadequate for quantitatively capturing complex and dynamic relationships between environmental factors and risk levels. In response, this study developed a risk assessment method that enabled the quantification of typical environmental factors’ impacts on oil depot fire and explosion risk. Specifically, the method quantified impacts through these pathways that are air temperature-driven, increasing human error probabilities and relative humidity-dependent electrostatic sparks events. To achieve this, the method synergistically combined fault tree analysis, cloud model theory, and information diffusion technique. The results indicated that oil depot fire and explosion risk exhibited a parabolic curve opening upward against air temperature, reaching its minimum at 20 °C. In contrast, the risk decreased monotonically with increasing relative humidity. It was also known that the impacts of relative humidity were relatively much smaller than those from the air temperature, which can be ignored during the analysis of oil depot fire and explosion risk. In practical application, the assessment results support the development of a predictive risk chart, facilitating real-time risk forecasting and enabling customization based on regional climatic conditions. Under the background of climate change, the developed method fulfills the critical demand for reliable risk assessment under evolving weather conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries\",\"volume\":\"99 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105800\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095042302500258X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095042302500258X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气候变化对火灾风险评估提出了新的要求,需要量化环境因素影响的方法。油库是火灾和爆炸的高危场所,露天露天环境对这些因素的影响很大。然而,传统的风险评估框架往往忽略了环境因素影响的定量表征。此外,现有的单一方法框架通常不足以定量地捕捉环境因素与风险水平之间复杂和动态的关系。为此,本研究开发了一种风险评估方法,可以量化典型环境因素对油库火灾和爆炸风险的影响。具体来说,该方法通过空气温度驱动、增加人为错误概率和相对湿度依赖的静电火花事件的这些途径量化了影响。为此,该方法将故障树分析、云模型理论和信息扩散技术相结合。结果表明:油库火灾爆炸危险性随气温升高呈抛物线曲线上升,在20℃时达到最小值;相反,风险随相对湿度的增加而单调降低。相对湿度对油库火灾爆炸危险性的影响相对较小,在油库火灾爆炸危险性分析中可以忽略。在实际应用中,评估结果支持开发预测风险图,促进实时风险预测,并可根据区域气候条件进行定制。在气候变化背景下,该方法满足了在不断变化的天气条件下进行可靠风险评估的关键需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying the impacts of typical environmental factors on oil depot fire and explosion risk
Climate change poses new requirements for fire risk assessment, necessitating methods to quantify the impacts of environmental factors. As a high fire and explosion risk place, crude oil depot, typically exposed to open air, is highly susceptible to such factors. However, conventional risk assessment frameworks usually overlook the quantitative characterization of environmental factors' impacts. Furthermore, existing single-method frameworks are generally inadequate for quantitatively capturing complex and dynamic relationships between environmental factors and risk levels. In response, this study developed a risk assessment method that enabled the quantification of typical environmental factors’ impacts on oil depot fire and explosion risk. Specifically, the method quantified impacts through these pathways that are air temperature-driven, increasing human error probabilities and relative humidity-dependent electrostatic sparks events. To achieve this, the method synergistically combined fault tree analysis, cloud model theory, and information diffusion technique. The results indicated that oil depot fire and explosion risk exhibited a parabolic curve opening upward against air temperature, reaching its minimum at 20 °C. In contrast, the risk decreased monotonically with increasing relative humidity. It was also known that the impacts of relative humidity were relatively much smaller than those from the air temperature, which can be ignored during the analysis of oil depot fire and explosion risk. In practical application, the assessment results support the development of a predictive risk chart, facilitating real-time risk forecasting and enabling customization based on regional climatic conditions. Under the background of climate change, the developed method fulfills the critical demand for reliable risk assessment under evolving weather conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信