Xingmin He , Shuai Zheng , Kai Sun , Yi He , Dan Yang , Anmin Wang , Yasen Hao , Peng Tan
{"title":"电极尺度应力表征揭示石墨阳极Li+插入机理","authors":"Xingmin He , Shuai Zheng , Kai Sun , Yi He , Dan Yang , Anmin Wang , Yasen Hao , Peng Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.ensm.2025.104629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As a preferred anode material for lithium-ion batteries, a deeper understanding of the lithiation mechanism in graphite is essential for advancing novel optimization strategies. In this study, the lattice evolution information traditionally obtained through techniques such as X-ray diffraction and neutron powder diffraction is innovatively translated into stress signals for analysis, providing mechanical insights into the Li⁺ intercalation mechanism in graphite. The dynamic lithiation behavior of graphite particle assemblies is simulated using the Monte Carlo method, and combined with in situ X-ray diffraction and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, the mechanical–electrochemical mapping relationship during lithiation is systematically elucidated. The lithiation process of graphite exhibits three distinct mechanical stages: C→LiC<sub>30</sub>, LiC<sub>30</sub>→LiC<sub>12</sub>, and LiC<sub>12</sub>→LiC<sub>6</sub>. Notably, during the transitions between the first/second and second/third stages, significantly differentiated mechanical signatures are observed, which deviate from theoretical predictions. Further analysis reveals that the former originates from a rapid phase separation process, while the latter is driven by lattice reconstruction induced by lithium intercalation. These two phenomena can be well explained by the Rüdorff–Hofmann interlayer intercalation model and the Daumas–Herold domain wall migration mechanism, respectively. The presence of such stage-specific mechanical responses suggests that distinct intercalation mechanisms govern different stages of graphite lithiation. The experimental findings presented in this work contribute to a multidimensional and comprehensive understanding of the graphite lithiation mechanism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":306,"journal":{"name":"Energy Storage Materials","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 104629"},"PeriodicalIF":20.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operando electrode-scale stress characterization revealing the Li+ insertion mechanism of graphite anode\",\"authors\":\"Xingmin He , Shuai Zheng , Kai Sun , Yi He , Dan Yang , Anmin Wang , Yasen Hao , Peng Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ensm.2025.104629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As a preferred anode material for lithium-ion batteries, a deeper understanding of the lithiation mechanism in graphite is essential for advancing novel optimization strategies. In this study, the lattice evolution information traditionally obtained through techniques such as X-ray diffraction and neutron powder diffraction is innovatively translated into stress signals for analysis, providing mechanical insights into the Li⁺ intercalation mechanism in graphite. The dynamic lithiation behavior of graphite particle assemblies is simulated using the Monte Carlo method, and combined with in situ X-ray diffraction and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, the mechanical–electrochemical mapping relationship during lithiation is systematically elucidated. The lithiation process of graphite exhibits three distinct mechanical stages: C→LiC<sub>30</sub>, LiC<sub>30</sub>→LiC<sub>12</sub>, and LiC<sub>12</sub>→LiC<sub>6</sub>. Notably, during the transitions between the first/second and second/third stages, significantly differentiated mechanical signatures are observed, which deviate from theoretical predictions. Further analysis reveals that the former originates from a rapid phase separation process, while the latter is driven by lattice reconstruction induced by lithium intercalation. These two phenomena can be well explained by the Rüdorff–Hofmann interlayer intercalation model and the Daumas–Herold domain wall migration mechanism, respectively. The presence of such stage-specific mechanical responses suggests that distinct intercalation mechanisms govern different stages of graphite lithiation. The experimental findings presented in this work contribute to a multidimensional and comprehensive understanding of the graphite lithiation mechanism.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Storage Materials\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104629\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Storage Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405829725006270\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Storage Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405829725006270","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Operando electrode-scale stress characterization revealing the Li+ insertion mechanism of graphite anode
As a preferred anode material for lithium-ion batteries, a deeper understanding of the lithiation mechanism in graphite is essential for advancing novel optimization strategies. In this study, the lattice evolution information traditionally obtained through techniques such as X-ray diffraction and neutron powder diffraction is innovatively translated into stress signals for analysis, providing mechanical insights into the Li⁺ intercalation mechanism in graphite. The dynamic lithiation behavior of graphite particle assemblies is simulated using the Monte Carlo method, and combined with in situ X-ray diffraction and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, the mechanical–electrochemical mapping relationship during lithiation is systematically elucidated. The lithiation process of graphite exhibits three distinct mechanical stages: C→LiC30, LiC30→LiC12, and LiC12→LiC6. Notably, during the transitions between the first/second and second/third stages, significantly differentiated mechanical signatures are observed, which deviate from theoretical predictions. Further analysis reveals that the former originates from a rapid phase separation process, while the latter is driven by lattice reconstruction induced by lithium intercalation. These two phenomena can be well explained by the Rüdorff–Hofmann interlayer intercalation model and the Daumas–Herold domain wall migration mechanism, respectively. The presence of such stage-specific mechanical responses suggests that distinct intercalation mechanisms govern different stages of graphite lithiation. The experimental findings presented in this work contribute to a multidimensional and comprehensive understanding of the graphite lithiation mechanism.
期刊介绍:
Energy Storage Materials is a global interdisciplinary journal dedicated to sharing scientific and technological advancements in materials and devices for advanced energy storage and related energy conversion, such as in metal-O2 batteries. The journal features comprehensive research articles, including full papers and short communications, as well as authoritative feature articles and reviews by leading experts in the field.
Energy Storage Materials covers a wide range of topics, including the synthesis, fabrication, structure, properties, performance, and technological applications of energy storage materials. Additionally, the journal explores strategies, policies, and developments in the field of energy storage materials and devices for sustainable energy.
Published papers are selected based on their scientific and technological significance, their ability to provide valuable new knowledge, and their relevance to the international research community.