地聚合物混凝土快速氯化物渗透性测试中的不一致性:对粘合剂化学,孔隙结构和测试单元配置的见解

IF 13.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Md Ibrahim Mostazid , Taehwan Kim , Stephen Foster , Basil Ben , Hossein Asadi , Ailar Hajimohammadi
{"title":"地聚合物混凝土快速氯化物渗透性测试中的不一致性:对粘合剂化学,孔隙结构和测试单元配置的见解","authors":"Md Ibrahim Mostazid ,&nbsp;Taehwan Kim ,&nbsp;Stephen Foster ,&nbsp;Basil Ben ,&nbsp;Hossein Asadi ,&nbsp;Ailar Hajimohammadi","doi":"10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2025.106340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Rapid Chloride Permeability Test (RCPT) is commonly used to evaluate chloride resistance in concrete; however, its applicability to geopolymer concrete (GPC) remains highly disputed due to inconsistent and often contradictory results under standard testing conditions (60 V, 6 h). This study addresses this critical gap by conducting a comprehensive experimental investigation, analysing the RCPT performance of 34 GPC mixes while systematically varying nine key mix design parameters (including precursor composition, activator modulus, FA/GGBS ratio, synthesis method, and others). In addition to RCPT results, the porosity and pore solution chemistry of selected mixes were characterised to uncover the mechanistic origins of charge transport behaviour in GPC. The findings reveal that CaO/SiO<sub>2</sub> ratio, modulated by precursor and activator chemistry, plays a dominant role in controlling capillary porosity and ultimately the charge passed. GPC mixes in this study showed premature test termination when the CaO/SiO<sub>2</sub> ratio was ≤0.28, except in one-part or thermally cured systems. Test termination also occurred at 85 % FA content, but this threshold dropped to 65 % with low-CaO fly ash and varied further with the synthesis method. Notably, the study identifies an unexpected negative correlation between pore solution conductivity and charge passed, challenging conventional assumptions based on OPC systems. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that standard RCPT protocols are often unreliable for GPC, especially in mixes with high porosity and low pore solution conductivity, where premature test termination is triggered by excessive current flow. This work provides new mechanistic insights into the electrically driven chloride transport in GPC and establishes a foundational framework for developing more reliable durability testing methods for alkali-activated materials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9865,"journal":{"name":"Cement & concrete composites","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 106340"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inconsistencies in rapid chloride permeability testing of geopolymer concrete: Insights into binder chemistry, pore structure, and test cell configuration\",\"authors\":\"Md Ibrahim Mostazid ,&nbsp;Taehwan Kim ,&nbsp;Stephen Foster ,&nbsp;Basil Ben ,&nbsp;Hossein Asadi ,&nbsp;Ailar Hajimohammadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2025.106340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Rapid Chloride Permeability Test (RCPT) is commonly used to evaluate chloride resistance in concrete; however, its applicability to geopolymer concrete (GPC) remains highly disputed due to inconsistent and often contradictory results under standard testing conditions (60 V, 6 h). This study addresses this critical gap by conducting a comprehensive experimental investigation, analysing the RCPT performance of 34 GPC mixes while systematically varying nine key mix design parameters (including precursor composition, activator modulus, FA/GGBS ratio, synthesis method, and others). In addition to RCPT results, the porosity and pore solution chemistry of selected mixes were characterised to uncover the mechanistic origins of charge transport behaviour in GPC. The findings reveal that CaO/SiO<sub>2</sub> ratio, modulated by precursor and activator chemistry, plays a dominant role in controlling capillary porosity and ultimately the charge passed. GPC mixes in this study showed premature test termination when the CaO/SiO<sub>2</sub> ratio was ≤0.28, except in one-part or thermally cured systems. Test termination also occurred at 85 % FA content, but this threshold dropped to 65 % with low-CaO fly ash and varied further with the synthesis method. Notably, the study identifies an unexpected negative correlation between pore solution conductivity and charge passed, challenging conventional assumptions based on OPC systems. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that standard RCPT protocols are often unreliable for GPC, especially in mixes with high porosity and low pore solution conductivity, where premature test termination is triggered by excessive current flow. This work provides new mechanistic insights into the electrically driven chloride transport in GPC and establishes a foundational framework for developing more reliable durability testing methods for alkali-activated materials.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cement & concrete composites\",\"volume\":\"165 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cement & concrete composites\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958946525004226\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cement & concrete composites","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958946525004226","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

快速氯离子渗透试验(RCPT)是评价混凝土抗氯离子性能的常用方法;然而,其对地聚合物混凝土(GPC)的适用性仍然存在很大争议,因为在标准测试条件下(60 V, 6 h)的结果不一致且经常相互矛盾。本研究通过进行全面的实验调查,分析了34种GPC混合料的RCPT性能,同时系统地改变了9个关键混合料设计参数(包括前驱体成分、活化剂模量、FA/GGBS比、合成方法等),从而解决了这一关键空白。除了RCPT结果外,还对选定混合物的孔隙率和孔溶液化学进行了表征,以揭示GPC中电荷传输行为的机制起源。研究结果表明,CaO/SiO2比受前驱体和活化剂化学性质的调节,在控制毛细管孔隙度和最终电荷通过中起主导作用。除单组分或热固化体系外,本研究中GPC混合料在CaO/SiO2比≤0.28时试验提前终止。当FA含量达到85%时,试验也会终止,但在低cao粉煤灰中,该阈值降至65%,并且随着合成方法的不同而进一步变化。值得注意的是,该研究发现孔隙溶液电导率与通过的电荷之间存在意想不到的负相关关系,挑战了基于OPC系统的传统假设。此外,研究结果表明,对于GPC,标准RCPT方案通常不可靠,特别是在高孔隙率和低导电性的混合物中,过大的电流会导致测试过早终止。这项工作为GPC中电驱动氯化物传输提供了新的机制见解,并为开发更可靠的碱活性材料耐久性测试方法建立了基础框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inconsistencies in rapid chloride permeability testing of geopolymer concrete: Insights into binder chemistry, pore structure, and test cell configuration
The Rapid Chloride Permeability Test (RCPT) is commonly used to evaluate chloride resistance in concrete; however, its applicability to geopolymer concrete (GPC) remains highly disputed due to inconsistent and often contradictory results under standard testing conditions (60 V, 6 h). This study addresses this critical gap by conducting a comprehensive experimental investigation, analysing the RCPT performance of 34 GPC mixes while systematically varying nine key mix design parameters (including precursor composition, activator modulus, FA/GGBS ratio, synthesis method, and others). In addition to RCPT results, the porosity and pore solution chemistry of selected mixes were characterised to uncover the mechanistic origins of charge transport behaviour in GPC. The findings reveal that CaO/SiO2 ratio, modulated by precursor and activator chemistry, plays a dominant role in controlling capillary porosity and ultimately the charge passed. GPC mixes in this study showed premature test termination when the CaO/SiO2 ratio was ≤0.28, except in one-part or thermally cured systems. Test termination also occurred at 85 % FA content, but this threshold dropped to 65 % with low-CaO fly ash and varied further with the synthesis method. Notably, the study identifies an unexpected negative correlation between pore solution conductivity and charge passed, challenging conventional assumptions based on OPC systems. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that standard RCPT protocols are often unreliable for GPC, especially in mixes with high porosity and low pore solution conductivity, where premature test termination is triggered by excessive current flow. This work provides new mechanistic insights into the electrically driven chloride transport in GPC and establishes a foundational framework for developing more reliable durability testing methods for alkali-activated materials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cement & concrete composites
Cement & concrete composites 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
11.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Cement & concrete composites focuses on advancements in cement-concrete composite technology and the production, use, and performance of cement-based construction materials. It covers a wide range of materials, including fiber-reinforced composites, polymer composites, ferrocement, and those incorporating special aggregates or waste materials. Major themes include microstructure, material properties, testing, durability, mechanics, modeling, design, fabrication, and practical applications. The journal welcomes papers on structural behavior, field studies, repair and maintenance, serviceability, and sustainability. It aims to enhance understanding, provide a platform for unconventional materials, promote low-cost energy-saving materials, and bridge the gap between materials science, engineering, and construction. Special issues on emerging topics are also published to encourage collaboration between materials scientists, engineers, designers, and fabricators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信