寻找PJI诊断金标准的持续斗争。

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Emanuel-Cristian Sandu, Catalin Cirstoiu, Sergiu Iordache, Mihai Aurel Costache, Georgian Longin Iacobescu, Adrian Cursaru
{"title":"寻找PJI诊断金标准的持续斗争。","authors":"Emanuel-Cristian Sandu, Catalin Cirstoiu, Sergiu Iordache, Mihai Aurel Costache, Georgian Longin Iacobescu, Adrian Cursaru","doi":"10.3390/reports8030155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of joint arthroplasty surgery that is difficult to both diagnose and treat. Misdiagnosing a prosthetic infection has terrible consequences for both the patient and healthcare system. No currently used diagnostic test fulfills the requirements to be considered a gold standard. This shortcoming has been overcome through the implementation of multi-criteria diagnostic protocols elaborated by societies including the Infectious Diseases Society of America, International Consensus Meeting and European Bone and Joint Infection Society, using a combination of clinical, paraclinical and molecular findings in order to achieve the best accuracy in diagnosing PJI. This review aims to survey the current state of the techniques and technologies used for the diagnosis of PJI, investigating the accuracies of serum biomarkers (e.g., C-reactive protein, Interleukin-6, procalcitonin, D-dimers, Serum Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1), synovial biomarkers (e.g., Antimicrobial peptides, lipocalin-2, leukocyte esterase, calprotectin), tissue biomarkers (e.g., Toll-like receptors, CD15) and advanced molecular techniques (e.g., Polymerase chain reaction, Metagenomic next-generation sequencing), as well as describing their ongoing limitations. In the search for an accurate, inexpensive and fast diagnostic test for PJI, we conclude that the accuracies of the currently studied biomarkers could be further enhanced through the development of novel detection technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":74664,"journal":{"name":"Reports (MDPI)","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ongoing Struggle to Find a Gold Standard for PJI Diagnosis.\",\"authors\":\"Emanuel-Cristian Sandu, Catalin Cirstoiu, Sergiu Iordache, Mihai Aurel Costache, Georgian Longin Iacobescu, Adrian Cursaru\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/reports8030155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of joint arthroplasty surgery that is difficult to both diagnose and treat. Misdiagnosing a prosthetic infection has terrible consequences for both the patient and healthcare system. No currently used diagnostic test fulfills the requirements to be considered a gold standard. This shortcoming has been overcome through the implementation of multi-criteria diagnostic protocols elaborated by societies including the Infectious Diseases Society of America, International Consensus Meeting and European Bone and Joint Infection Society, using a combination of clinical, paraclinical and molecular findings in order to achieve the best accuracy in diagnosing PJI. This review aims to survey the current state of the techniques and technologies used for the diagnosis of PJI, investigating the accuracies of serum biomarkers (e.g., C-reactive protein, Interleukin-6, procalcitonin, D-dimers, Serum Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1), synovial biomarkers (e.g., Antimicrobial peptides, lipocalin-2, leukocyte esterase, calprotectin), tissue biomarkers (e.g., Toll-like receptors, CD15) and advanced molecular techniques (e.g., Polymerase chain reaction, Metagenomic next-generation sequencing), as well as describing their ongoing limitations. In the search for an accurate, inexpensive and fast diagnostic test for PJI, we conclude that the accuracies of the currently studied biomarkers could be further enhanced through the development of novel detection technologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reports (MDPI)\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452527/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reports (MDPI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/reports8030155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports (MDPI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/reports8030155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

假体周围关节感染(PJI)是关节置换术中一种难以诊断和治疗的严重并发症。假体感染的误诊对病人和医疗保健系统都有可怕的后果。目前使用的诊断测试没有满足被认为是金标准的要求。通过实施多标准诊断方案,包括美国传染病学会、国际共识会议和欧洲骨和关节感染学会制定的多标准诊断方案,克服了这一缺点,结合临床、临床旁和分子发现,以达到诊断PJI的最佳准确性。本文旨在综述目前用于PJI诊断的技术现状,研究血清生物标志物(如c反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6、降钙素原、d -二聚体、血清细胞间粘附分子-1)、滑膜生物标志物(如抗菌肽、脂钙素-2、白细胞酯酶、钙保护蛋白)、组织生物标志物(如toll样受体、CD15)和先进分子技术(如聚合酶链反应、新一代宏基因组测序),以及描述它们目前的局限性。在寻找一种准确、廉价和快速的PJI诊断方法的过程中,我们得出结论,通过开发新的检测技术,目前研究的生物标志物的准确性可以进一步提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Ongoing Struggle to Find a Gold Standard for PJI Diagnosis.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of joint arthroplasty surgery that is difficult to both diagnose and treat. Misdiagnosing a prosthetic infection has terrible consequences for both the patient and healthcare system. No currently used diagnostic test fulfills the requirements to be considered a gold standard. This shortcoming has been overcome through the implementation of multi-criteria diagnostic protocols elaborated by societies including the Infectious Diseases Society of America, International Consensus Meeting and European Bone and Joint Infection Society, using a combination of clinical, paraclinical and molecular findings in order to achieve the best accuracy in diagnosing PJI. This review aims to survey the current state of the techniques and technologies used for the diagnosis of PJI, investigating the accuracies of serum biomarkers (e.g., C-reactive protein, Interleukin-6, procalcitonin, D-dimers, Serum Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1), synovial biomarkers (e.g., Antimicrobial peptides, lipocalin-2, leukocyte esterase, calprotectin), tissue biomarkers (e.g., Toll-like receptors, CD15) and advanced molecular techniques (e.g., Polymerase chain reaction, Metagenomic next-generation sequencing), as well as describing their ongoing limitations. In the search for an accurate, inexpensive and fast diagnostic test for PJI, we conclude that the accuracies of the currently studied biomarkers could be further enhanced through the development of novel detection technologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信