尿内结石手术后残留的肾内导丝碎片:顺行经皮网取及文献回顾。

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Timoleon Giannakas, Aris Kaltsas, Ornella Moschovaki-Zeiger, Stavros Grigoriadis, Michael Chrisofos
{"title":"尿内结石手术后残留的肾内导丝碎片:顺行经皮网取及文献回顾。","authors":"Timoleon Giannakas, Aris Kaltsas, Ornella Moschovaki-Zeiger, Stavros Grigoriadis, Michael Chrisofos","doi":"10.3390/reports8030178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Clinical Significance</b>: Retained intrarenal foreign bodies are rare adverse events after endourological stone surgery. Guidewire fracture or detachment is uncommon and can trigger infection, obstruction, or encrustation if unrecognized. We report antegrade percutaneous snare retrieval of a retained hydrophilic guidewire tip and provide a concise literature review (seven PubMed-indexed intrarenal cases identified by a structured search) to inform diagnosis, management, and prevention. We also clarify the clinical rationale for an antegrade versus retrograde approach and the sequencing of decompression, definitive stone management, and stenting in the context of sepsis. <b>Case Presentation</b>: A 75-year-old woman with diabetes presented with obstructive left pyelonephritis from ureteral and renal calculi. After urgent percutaneous nephrostomy, she underwent semirigid and flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with double-J stenting; the nephrostomy remained. During routine tube removal, the stent was inadvertently extracted. Seven days later she re-presented with fever and flank pain. KUB and non-contrast CT showed a linear 4 cm radiopaque foreign body in the left renal pelvis with dilatation. Under local anesthesia and fluoroscopy, a percutaneous tract was used to deploy a 35 mm gooseneck snare and retrieve the distal tip of a hydrophilic guidewire (Sensor/ZIP-type). Inflammatory markers were normalized; the nephrostomy was removed on day 5; six-week imaging confirmed complete clearance without complications. <b>Conclusions</b>: Retained guidewire fragments should be suspected in postoperative patients with unexplained urinary symptoms or infection. Cross-sectional imaging confirms the diagnosis, while minimally invasive extraction-preferably an antegrade percutaneous approach for rigid or coiled fragments-achieves prompt resolution. This case adds to the seven prior PubMed-indexed intrarenal reports identified in our review, bringing the total to eight, underscoring prevention through pre-/post-use instrument checks, immediate fluoroscopy when withdrawal resistance occurs, and structured device accounting to avoid \"never events.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":74664,"journal":{"name":"Reports (MDPI)","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retained Intrarenal Guidewire Fragment After Endourological Stone Surgery: Antegrade Percutaneous Snare Retrieval and Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"Timoleon Giannakas, Aris Kaltsas, Ornella Moschovaki-Zeiger, Stavros Grigoriadis, Michael Chrisofos\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/reports8030178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and Clinical Significance</b>: Retained intrarenal foreign bodies are rare adverse events after endourological stone surgery. Guidewire fracture or detachment is uncommon and can trigger infection, obstruction, or encrustation if unrecognized. We report antegrade percutaneous snare retrieval of a retained hydrophilic guidewire tip and provide a concise literature review (seven PubMed-indexed intrarenal cases identified by a structured search) to inform diagnosis, management, and prevention. We also clarify the clinical rationale for an antegrade versus retrograde approach and the sequencing of decompression, definitive stone management, and stenting in the context of sepsis. <b>Case Presentation</b>: A 75-year-old woman with diabetes presented with obstructive left pyelonephritis from ureteral and renal calculi. After urgent percutaneous nephrostomy, she underwent semirigid and flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with double-J stenting; the nephrostomy remained. During routine tube removal, the stent was inadvertently extracted. Seven days later she re-presented with fever and flank pain. KUB and non-contrast CT showed a linear 4 cm radiopaque foreign body in the left renal pelvis with dilatation. Under local anesthesia and fluoroscopy, a percutaneous tract was used to deploy a 35 mm gooseneck snare and retrieve the distal tip of a hydrophilic guidewire (Sensor/ZIP-type). Inflammatory markers were normalized; the nephrostomy was removed on day 5; six-week imaging confirmed complete clearance without complications. <b>Conclusions</b>: Retained guidewire fragments should be suspected in postoperative patients with unexplained urinary symptoms or infection. Cross-sectional imaging confirms the diagnosis, while minimally invasive extraction-preferably an antegrade percutaneous approach for rigid or coiled fragments-achieves prompt resolution. This case adds to the seven prior PubMed-indexed intrarenal reports identified in our review, bringing the total to eight, underscoring prevention through pre-/post-use instrument checks, immediate fluoroscopy when withdrawal resistance occurs, and structured device accounting to avoid \\\"never events.\\\"</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reports (MDPI)\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452311/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reports (MDPI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/reports8030178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports (MDPI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/reports8030178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与临床意义:肾内异物残留是泌尿道结石手术后罕见的不良事件。导丝骨折或脱离是不常见的,如果不被识别,会引发感染、阻塞或结痂。我们报道顺行经皮取下保留的亲水导丝尖端,并提供简明的文献综述(通过结构化搜索确定的7例pubmed索引的肾内病例),以告知诊断、管理和预防。我们还澄清了在脓毒症背景下顺行与逆行入路的临床依据,以及减压、明确结石处理和支架植入术的顺序。病例介绍:一名75岁女性糖尿病患者表现为输尿管结石和肾结石引起的梗阻性左肾盂肾炎。经皮肾造瘘后,患者接受了半刚性和柔性输尿管镜碎石术,双j型支架置入;肾造口术仍然存在。在常规拔管过程中,不慎取出支架。7天后,她再次出现发烧和腹部疼痛。KUB和非对比CT显示左侧肾盂一线状4cm不透射线的异物,呈扩张状。在局部麻醉和透视下,使用经皮通道部署35mm鹅颈圈套并取出亲水导丝(Sensor/ zip型)的远端。炎症指标归一化;第5天切除肾造口;6周影像学证实完全清除,无并发症。结论:术后出现不明原因泌尿系统症状或感染的患者应怀疑有导丝碎片残留。横断成像证实了诊断,而微创提取-最好是对刚性或卷曲碎片进行顺行经皮入路-可迅速解决问题。该病例加上我们回顾中发现的7例经pubmed索引的静脉内报告,使总数达到8例,强调通过使用前/使用后器械检查进行预防,当出现戒断阻力时立即进行透视检查,并进行结构化的器械会计以避免“从未发生的事件”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retained Intrarenal Guidewire Fragment After Endourological Stone Surgery: Antegrade Percutaneous Snare Retrieval and Literature Review.

Background and Clinical Significance: Retained intrarenal foreign bodies are rare adverse events after endourological stone surgery. Guidewire fracture or detachment is uncommon and can trigger infection, obstruction, or encrustation if unrecognized. We report antegrade percutaneous snare retrieval of a retained hydrophilic guidewire tip and provide a concise literature review (seven PubMed-indexed intrarenal cases identified by a structured search) to inform diagnosis, management, and prevention. We also clarify the clinical rationale for an antegrade versus retrograde approach and the sequencing of decompression, definitive stone management, and stenting in the context of sepsis. Case Presentation: A 75-year-old woman with diabetes presented with obstructive left pyelonephritis from ureteral and renal calculi. After urgent percutaneous nephrostomy, she underwent semirigid and flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with double-J stenting; the nephrostomy remained. During routine tube removal, the stent was inadvertently extracted. Seven days later she re-presented with fever and flank pain. KUB and non-contrast CT showed a linear 4 cm radiopaque foreign body in the left renal pelvis with dilatation. Under local anesthesia and fluoroscopy, a percutaneous tract was used to deploy a 35 mm gooseneck snare and retrieve the distal tip of a hydrophilic guidewire (Sensor/ZIP-type). Inflammatory markers were normalized; the nephrostomy was removed on day 5; six-week imaging confirmed complete clearance without complications. Conclusions: Retained guidewire fragments should be suspected in postoperative patients with unexplained urinary symptoms or infection. Cross-sectional imaging confirms the diagnosis, while minimally invasive extraction-preferably an antegrade percutaneous approach for rigid or coiled fragments-achieves prompt resolution. This case adds to the seven prior PubMed-indexed intrarenal reports identified in our review, bringing the total to eight, underscoring prevention through pre-/post-use instrument checks, immediate fluoroscopy when withdrawal resistance occurs, and structured device accounting to avoid "never events."

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信