Yi-Xiang Zhang, Hao-Tian Yin, Ya-Xing Liu, Xin Fu, Jun Liu
{"title":"短视频分享平台视频作为骨关节炎信息来源的横断面内容分析研究","authors":"Yi-Xiang Zhang, Hao-Tian Yin, Ya-Xing Liu, Xin Fu, Jun Liu","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1622503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating condition characterized by pain, stiffness, and impaired mobility, significantly affecting patients' quality of life. Health education is crucial in helping individuals understand OA and its management. In China, where OA is highly prevalent, platforms such as TikTok, WeChat, and XiaoHongshu have become prominent sources of health information. However, there is a lack of research regarding the reliability and educational quality of OA-related content on these platforms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed the top 100 OA-related videos across three major platforms: TikTok, WeChat, and XiaoHongshu. We systematically evaluated the content quality, reliability, and educational value using established tools, such as the DISCERN scale, JAMA benchmark criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) system. The study also compared differences in video content across platforms, offering insights into their relevance for addressing professional needs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Video quality varied significantly between platforms. TikTok outperformed WeChat and XiaoHongshu in all scoring criteria, with mean DISCERN scores of 32.42 (SD 0.37), 24.57 (SD 0.34), and 30.21 (SD 0.10), respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). TikTok also scored higher on the JAMA (1.36, SD 0.07) and GQS (2.46, SD 0.08) scales (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Videos created by healthcare professionals scored higher than those created by non-professionals (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Disease education and symptom self-examination content were more engaging, whereas rehabilitation videos received less attention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short-video platforms have great potential for chronic disease health education, with the caveat that the quality of the videos currently varies, and the authenticity of the video content is yet to be verified. While professional doctors play a crucial role in ensuring the quality and authenticity of video content, viewers should approach it with a critical mindset. Even without medical expertise, viewers should be encouraged to question the information and consult multiple sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1622503"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Videos in short-video sharing platforms as sources of information on osteoarthritis: cross-sectional content analysis study.\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Xiang Zhang, Hao-Tian Yin, Ya-Xing Liu, Xin Fu, Jun Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1622503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating condition characterized by pain, stiffness, and impaired mobility, significantly affecting patients' quality of life. Health education is crucial in helping individuals understand OA and its management. In China, where OA is highly prevalent, platforms such as TikTok, WeChat, and XiaoHongshu have become prominent sources of health information. However, there is a lack of research regarding the reliability and educational quality of OA-related content on these platforms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed the top 100 OA-related videos across three major platforms: TikTok, WeChat, and XiaoHongshu. We systematically evaluated the content quality, reliability, and educational value using established tools, such as the DISCERN scale, JAMA benchmark criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) system. The study also compared differences in video content across platforms, offering insights into their relevance for addressing professional needs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Video quality varied significantly between platforms. TikTok outperformed WeChat and XiaoHongshu in all scoring criteria, with mean DISCERN scores of 32.42 (SD 0.37), 24.57 (SD 0.34), and 30.21 (SD 0.10), respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). TikTok also scored higher on the JAMA (1.36, SD 0.07) and GQS (2.46, SD 0.08) scales (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Videos created by healthcare professionals scored higher than those created by non-professionals (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Disease education and symptom self-examination content were more engaging, whereas rehabilitation videos received less attention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short-video platforms have great potential for chronic disease health education, with the caveat that the quality of the videos currently varies, and the authenticity of the video content is yet to be verified. While professional doctors play a crucial role in ensuring the quality and authenticity of video content, viewers should approach it with a critical mindset. Even without medical expertise, viewers should be encouraged to question the information and consult multiple sources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in digital health\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1622503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446246/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1622503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1622503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:骨关节炎(OA)是一种以疼痛、僵硬和活动能力受损为特征的衰弱性疾病,严重影响患者的生活质量。健康教育对于帮助个人了解OA及其管理至关重要。在OA高度普及的中国,抖音、b微信、小红书等平台已经成为重要的健康信息来源。然而,这些平台上与oa相关的内容的可靠性和教育质量缺乏研究。方法:本研究分析了三大平台:TikTok、微信和小红书的前100个oa相关视频。我们系统地评估了内容的质量、可靠性和教育价值,使用了现有的工具,如DISCERN量表、JAMA基准标准和全球质量评分(GQS)系统。该研究还比较了不同平台视频内容的差异,为解决专业需求的相关性提供了见解。结果:平台间视频质量差异显著。TikTok在所有评分标准上都优于微信和小红书,其平均DISCERN得分分别为32.42 (SD 0.37)、24.57 (SD 0.34)和30.21 (SD 0.10) (P P P)结论:短视频平台在慢性病健康教育方面具有很大的潜力,但目前视频质量不一,视频内容的真实性有待验证。虽然专业医生在确保视频内容的质量和真实性方面发挥着至关重要的作用,但观众应该以批判的心态看待它。即使没有医学专业知识,也应该鼓励观众对信息提出质疑,并咨询多个来源。
Videos in short-video sharing platforms as sources of information on osteoarthritis: cross-sectional content analysis study.
Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating condition characterized by pain, stiffness, and impaired mobility, significantly affecting patients' quality of life. Health education is crucial in helping individuals understand OA and its management. In China, where OA is highly prevalent, platforms such as TikTok, WeChat, and XiaoHongshu have become prominent sources of health information. However, there is a lack of research regarding the reliability and educational quality of OA-related content on these platforms.
Methods: This study analyzed the top 100 OA-related videos across three major platforms: TikTok, WeChat, and XiaoHongshu. We systematically evaluated the content quality, reliability, and educational value using established tools, such as the DISCERN scale, JAMA benchmark criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) system. The study also compared differences in video content across platforms, offering insights into their relevance for addressing professional needs.
Results: Video quality varied significantly between platforms. TikTok outperformed WeChat and XiaoHongshu in all scoring criteria, with mean DISCERN scores of 32.42 (SD 0.37), 24.57 (SD 0.34), and 30.21 (SD 0.10), respectively (P < 0.001). TikTok also scored higher on the JAMA (1.36, SD 0.07) and GQS (2.46, SD 0.08) scales (P < 0.001). Videos created by healthcare professionals scored higher than those created by non-professionals (P < 0.001). Disease education and symptom self-examination content were more engaging, whereas rehabilitation videos received less attention.
Conclusions: Short-video platforms have great potential for chronic disease health education, with the caveat that the quality of the videos currently varies, and the authenticity of the video content is yet to be verified. While professional doctors play a crucial role in ensuring the quality and authenticity of video content, viewers should approach it with a critical mindset. Even without medical expertise, viewers should be encouraged to question the information and consult multiple sources.