多发性硬化症认知评估新方法研究进展。

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
NeuroSci Pub Date : 2025-09-05 DOI:10.3390/neurosci6030087
Jacob Balconi, Dawn Langdon, Bishal Dhakal, Ralph H B Benedict
{"title":"多发性硬化症认知评估新方法研究进展。","authors":"Jacob Balconi, Dawn Langdon, Bishal Dhakal, Ralph H B Benedict","doi":"10.3390/neurosci6030087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accessible, dependable cognitive assessment is integral to patient care of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Traditional neuropsychological tests are well validated in the multiple sclerosis (MS) population, but not without limitations, such as the time and financial cost associated with traditional in person administration. Recent endeavors have sought to refine assessment, with particular attention to psychometric properties, accessibility, efficiency, and other practical considerations. One approach has been to streamline neuropsychological batteries to brief measures of essential domains, such as the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS). Another approach is the use of computerized neuropsychological assessment devices (CNADs). A systematic review of CNADs in PwMS was published in 2019. However, research has continued to expand in the years since. Here, we present an updated review of the BICAMS and further development of CNADs in MS. Tests with strong psychometric foundations are highlighted.</p>","PeriodicalId":74294,"journal":{"name":"NeuroSci","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Update on New Approaches to Cognitive Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Balconi, Dawn Langdon, Bishal Dhakal, Ralph H B Benedict\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/neurosci6030087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accessible, dependable cognitive assessment is integral to patient care of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Traditional neuropsychological tests are well validated in the multiple sclerosis (MS) population, but not without limitations, such as the time and financial cost associated with traditional in person administration. Recent endeavors have sought to refine assessment, with particular attention to psychometric properties, accessibility, efficiency, and other practical considerations. One approach has been to streamline neuropsychological batteries to brief measures of essential domains, such as the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS). Another approach is the use of computerized neuropsychological assessment devices (CNADs). A systematic review of CNADs in PwMS was published in 2019. However, research has continued to expand in the years since. Here, we present an updated review of the BICAMS and further development of CNADs in MS. Tests with strong psychometric foundations are highlighted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NeuroSci\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452307/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NeuroSci\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurosci6030087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroSci","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurosci6030087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可获得、可靠的认知评估是多发性硬化症(PwMS)患者护理不可或缺的一部分。传统的神经心理学测试在多发性硬化症(MS)人群中得到了很好的验证,但并非没有限制,例如与传统的亲自给药相关的时间和经济成本。最近的努力试图改进评估,特别关注心理测量特性、可及性、效率和其他实际考虑因素。一种方法是简化神经心理学电池,以对基本领域进行简短的测量,例如MS的简要国际认知评估(BICAMS)。另一种方法是使用计算机神经心理评估设备(cnad)。2019年发表了一篇关于cnad在PwMS中的系统综述。然而,从那以后的几年里,研究一直在不断扩大。在此,我们对BICAMS进行了最新的回顾,并强调了具有强大心理测量基础的ms测试中cnad的进一步发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Update on New Approaches to Cognitive Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis.

Accessible, dependable cognitive assessment is integral to patient care of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Traditional neuropsychological tests are well validated in the multiple sclerosis (MS) population, but not without limitations, such as the time and financial cost associated with traditional in person administration. Recent endeavors have sought to refine assessment, with particular attention to psychometric properties, accessibility, efficiency, and other practical considerations. One approach has been to streamline neuropsychological batteries to brief measures of essential domains, such as the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS). Another approach is the use of computerized neuropsychological assessment devices (CNADs). A systematic review of CNADs in PwMS was published in 2019. However, research has continued to expand in the years since. Here, we present an updated review of the BICAMS and further development of CNADs in MS. Tests with strong psychometric foundations are highlighted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信