评估农村人口获得精神卫生保健的障碍和对处方数字疗法的看法:一项横断面调查。

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-09-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1655446
Grace Danon, Cody E Dunn, Michael Robins, Arundati Nagendra, Chuck Strand, Lisa Palko, Adam Colborn, Jackie Menjivar, Junko Saber
{"title":"评估农村人口获得精神卫生保健的障碍和对处方数字疗法的看法:一项横断面调查。","authors":"Grace Danon, Cody E Dunn, Michael Robins, Arundati Nagendra, Chuck Strand, Lisa Palko, Adam Colborn, Jackie Menjivar, Junko Saber","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1655446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prescription Digital Therapeutics (PDTs) hold unique potential to improve mental health in underserved rural areas. However, potential users' perceptions towards PDTs and community-specific differences in barriers to care are not well-understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an online survey of 351 U.S. adults with ≥1 mental health condition and care-seeking behaviors. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used to evaluate rural and non-rural differences in demographics, social determinants of health, current barriers to mental health treatment, and the perceived value of PDTs. Key limitations of this approach include self-reported rurality and digital access bias associated with online survey distribution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers to mental healthcare impacted 60% of all rural respondents, and rurality was associated with unique challenges like lower incomes, lower education levels, substantial Medicaid enrollment, and further distances from care. Rural respondents were also more likely to be completely unfamiliar with digital apps for mental health treatment. 89% of all respondents thought PDTs could address at least one barrier to care and about 97% of respondents were likely to use a PDT recommended by their provider.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Existing gaps in care and positive perceptions towards PDTs demonstrate unique promise for these modalities to address unmet mental health needs. However, lower PDT familiarity among rural respondents suggests a need for provider intervention and policy reforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1655446"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443765/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing rural populations' barriers to mental healthcare and perceptions towards prescription digital therapeutics: a cross-sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Grace Danon, Cody E Dunn, Michael Robins, Arundati Nagendra, Chuck Strand, Lisa Palko, Adam Colborn, Jackie Menjivar, Junko Saber\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1655446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prescription Digital Therapeutics (PDTs) hold unique potential to improve mental health in underserved rural areas. However, potential users' perceptions towards PDTs and community-specific differences in barriers to care are not well-understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an online survey of 351 U.S. adults with ≥1 mental health condition and care-seeking behaviors. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used to evaluate rural and non-rural differences in demographics, social determinants of health, current barriers to mental health treatment, and the perceived value of PDTs. Key limitations of this approach include self-reported rurality and digital access bias associated with online survey distribution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers to mental healthcare impacted 60% of all rural respondents, and rurality was associated with unique challenges like lower incomes, lower education levels, substantial Medicaid enrollment, and further distances from care. Rural respondents were also more likely to be completely unfamiliar with digital apps for mental health treatment. 89% of all respondents thought PDTs could address at least one barrier to care and about 97% of respondents were likely to use a PDT recommended by their provider.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Existing gaps in care and positive perceptions towards PDTs demonstrate unique promise for these modalities to address unmet mental health needs. However, lower PDT familiarity among rural respondents suggests a need for provider intervention and policy reforms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in digital health\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1655446\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443765/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1655446\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1655446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

处方数字疗法(PDTs)在改善服务不足的农村地区的精神健康方面具有独特的潜力。然而,潜在用户对pdt的看法以及社区在护理障碍方面的具体差异尚未得到很好的了解。方法:我们对351名有≥1种心理健康状况和求医行为的美国成年人进行了在线调查。使用描述性统计和非参数检验来评估农村和非农村在人口统计学、健康的社会决定因素、目前心理健康治疗的障碍和PDTs的感知价值方面的差异。这种方法的主要局限性包括自我报告的农村性和与在线调查分布相关的数字访问偏见。结果:60%的农村受访者受到精神卫生保健障碍的影响,农村地区面临着独特的挑战,如收入较低、教育水平较低、大量的医疗补助登记以及距离医疗中心较远。农村受访者也更有可能完全不熟悉用于心理健康治疗的数字应用程序。89%的受访者认为PDT可以解决至少一个护理障碍,约97%的受访者可能会使用其提供者推荐的PDT。讨论:在护理方面的现有差距和对pdt的积极看法表明,这些模式在解决未满足的精神卫生需求方面具有独特的前景。然而,农村受访者对PDT的熟悉程度较低,这表明需要进行提供者干预和政策改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing rural populations' barriers to mental healthcare and perceptions towards prescription digital therapeutics: a cross-sectional survey.

Assessing rural populations' barriers to mental healthcare and perceptions towards prescription digital therapeutics: a cross-sectional survey.

Introduction: Prescription Digital Therapeutics (PDTs) hold unique potential to improve mental health in underserved rural areas. However, potential users' perceptions towards PDTs and community-specific differences in barriers to care are not well-understood.

Methods: We conducted an online survey of 351 U.S. adults with ≥1 mental health condition and care-seeking behaviors. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used to evaluate rural and non-rural differences in demographics, social determinants of health, current barriers to mental health treatment, and the perceived value of PDTs. Key limitations of this approach include self-reported rurality and digital access bias associated with online survey distribution.

Results: Barriers to mental healthcare impacted 60% of all rural respondents, and rurality was associated with unique challenges like lower incomes, lower education levels, substantial Medicaid enrollment, and further distances from care. Rural respondents were also more likely to be completely unfamiliar with digital apps for mental health treatment. 89% of all respondents thought PDTs could address at least one barrier to care and about 97% of respondents were likely to use a PDT recommended by their provider.

Discussion: Existing gaps in care and positive perceptions towards PDTs demonstrate unique promise for these modalities to address unmet mental health needs. However, lower PDT familiarity among rural respondents suggests a need for provider intervention and policy reforms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信