“阴险的习惯”:历史视角下《拉隆德报告》的道德视野。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Catherine Carstairs
{"title":"“阴险的习惯”:历史视角下《拉隆德报告》的道德视野。","authors":"Catherine Carstairs","doi":"10.17269/s41997-025-01063-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Lalonde Report, A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians, is rightly celebrated as an important Canadian contribution to the development of health promotion. It introduced the \"Health Field Concept\"-the idea that health was the result of human biology, health care systems, the environment, and lifestyle. Although the health field concept was new, the report drew on a long tradition within public health of blaming individuals for their own health problems. With less evidence, some scholars have also made the case for the Lalonde Report contributing to the social determinants of health. But A New Perspective paid little attention to the systemic barriers that prevented people from eating well, exercising, drinking less, or quitting smoking. While it occasionally acknowledged the constraints of poverty, the focus was much more on people's individual responsibility to improve their health. This paper contextualizes the Lalonde Report in the longer history of public health campaigns in Canada and shows the extent to which the Lalonde Report was a product of its time, age, and authors. At the end, the paper will address the intellectual origins of the social determinants of health and argue that the Lalonde Report made only a marginal contribution to the social determinants of health.</p>","PeriodicalId":51407,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique","volume":"116 Suppl 1","pages":"15-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Insidious habits\\\": The moral vision of the Lalonde Report in historical perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Carstairs\",\"doi\":\"10.17269/s41997-025-01063-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Lalonde Report, A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians, is rightly celebrated as an important Canadian contribution to the development of health promotion. It introduced the \\\"Health Field Concept\\\"-the idea that health was the result of human biology, health care systems, the environment, and lifestyle. Although the health field concept was new, the report drew on a long tradition within public health of blaming individuals for their own health problems. With less evidence, some scholars have also made the case for the Lalonde Report contributing to the social determinants of health. But A New Perspective paid little attention to the systemic barriers that prevented people from eating well, exercising, drinking less, or quitting smoking. While it occasionally acknowledged the constraints of poverty, the focus was much more on people's individual responsibility to improve their health. This paper contextualizes the Lalonde Report in the longer history of public health campaigns in Canada and shows the extent to which the Lalonde Report was a product of its time, age, and authors. At the end, the paper will address the intellectual origins of the social determinants of health and argue that the Lalonde Report made only a marginal contribution to the social determinants of health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique\",\"volume\":\"116 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"15-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12483007/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-025-01063-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-025-01063-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《拉隆德报告:对加拿大人健康的新看法》作为加拿大对促进健康发展的重要贡献而受到赞扬是正确的。它引入了“健康领域概念”——认为健康是人类生物学、医疗保健系统、环境和生活方式的结果。虽然卫生领域的概念是新的,但该报告借鉴了公共卫生领域的一个长期传统,即将个人的健康问题归咎于个人。在证据较少的情况下,一些学者也认为《拉隆德报告》有助于促进健康的社会决定因素。但《新视角》很少关注那些阻碍人们健康饮食、锻炼、少喝酒或戒烟的系统性障碍。虽然它偶尔承认贫穷的限制,但重点更多地放在人们改善健康的个人责任上。本文将《拉隆德报告》置于加拿大公共卫生运动的较长历史背景中,并展示了《拉隆德报告》在多大程度上是其时代、年龄和作者的产物。最后,本文将讨论健康的社会决定因素的知识起源,并认为拉隆德报告对健康的社会决定因素的贡献很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Insidious habits": The moral vision of the Lalonde Report in historical perspective.

The Lalonde Report, A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians, is rightly celebrated as an important Canadian contribution to the development of health promotion. It introduced the "Health Field Concept"-the idea that health was the result of human biology, health care systems, the environment, and lifestyle. Although the health field concept was new, the report drew on a long tradition within public health of blaming individuals for their own health problems. With less evidence, some scholars have also made the case for the Lalonde Report contributing to the social determinants of health. But A New Perspective paid little attention to the systemic barriers that prevented people from eating well, exercising, drinking less, or quitting smoking. While it occasionally acknowledged the constraints of poverty, the focus was much more on people's individual responsibility to improve their health. This paper contextualizes the Lalonde Report in the longer history of public health campaigns in Canada and shows the extent to which the Lalonde Report was a product of its time, age, and authors. At the end, the paper will address the intellectual origins of the social determinants of health and argue that the Lalonde Report made only a marginal contribution to the social determinants of health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique
Canadian Journal of Public Health-Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.70%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Public Health is dedicated to fostering excellence in public health research, scholarship, policy and practice. The aim of the Journal is to advance public health research and practice in Canada and around the world, thus contributing to the improvement of the health of populations and the reduction of health inequalities. CJPH publishes original research and scholarly articles submitted in either English or French that are relevant to population and public health. CJPH is an independent, peer-reviewed journal owned by the Canadian Public Health Association and published by Springer.   Énoncé de mission La Revue canadienne de santé publique se consacre à promouvoir l’excellence dans la recherche, les travaux d’érudition, les politiques et les pratiques de santé publique. Son but est de faire progresser la recherche et les pratiques de santé publique au Canada et dans le monde, contribuant ainsi à l’amélioration de la santé des populations et à la réduction des inégalités de santé. La RCSP publie des articles savants et des travaux inédits, soumis en anglais ou en français, qui sont d’intérêt pour la santé publique et des populations. La RCSP est une revue indépendante avec comité de lecture, propriété de l’Association canadienne de santé publique et publiée par Springer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信