Lauren Sheppard, Vicki Brown, Kim Robinson, Marj Moodie
{"title":"对澳大利亚减少对妇女的暴力行为的长期资助的批判性审查。","authors":"Lauren Sheppard, Vicki Brown, Kim Robinson, Marj Moodie","doi":"10.1071/PU24027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives and importance of study Adequate funding for comprehensive strategies is crucial to eliminating violence against women. This study examined funding committed during a major policy initiative aimed at reducing violence against women in Australia between 2010 and 2023. Study type A retrospective review of federal, state and territory government budget documents to estimate funding levels and examine the distribution of resources across types of strategies aimed at addressing violence against women in Australia. Methods Review and data extraction of budget estimates and activity descriptions addressing violence against women and gender inequality during the time of Australia's National Plan to Reduce Violence Against Women and their Children . Mixed-method analysis explored trends in funding over time by jurisdiction and strategy type and identified priority actions. Results Of the 508 papers screened, 201 documented relevant information with over 900 extractions for activities addressing violence against women (n =797) and gender inequality (n =110), totalling an estimated A$12.1billion. Rather than a steady investment, funding fluctuated, and jurisdictional differences occurred. Supporting people impacted by violence, raising workforce capacity and developing systems to strengthen the response were supported. Primary prevention, incorporating awareness-raising and promoting gender equality, received fewer resources overall, with funding directed towards education, workplace and sports settings. Conclusions During a critical time of action to reduce violence against women, increased government funding occurred, supporting diverse strategies. However, a lack of clarity and consistency in budget reporting contributed to uncertainty in total funding committed over this timeline. Having a fiscal strategy over the entire action plan will embed long-term funding and improve future planning and monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":45898,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Research & Practice","volume":"35 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A critical review of long-term funding for reducing violence against women in Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Sheppard, Vicki Brown, Kim Robinson, Marj Moodie\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/PU24027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objectives and importance of study Adequate funding for comprehensive strategies is crucial to eliminating violence against women. This study examined funding committed during a major policy initiative aimed at reducing violence against women in Australia between 2010 and 2023. Study type A retrospective review of federal, state and territory government budget documents to estimate funding levels and examine the distribution of resources across types of strategies aimed at addressing violence against women in Australia. Methods Review and data extraction of budget estimates and activity descriptions addressing violence against women and gender inequality during the time of Australia's National Plan to Reduce Violence Against Women and their Children . Mixed-method analysis explored trends in funding over time by jurisdiction and strategy type and identified priority actions. Results Of the 508 papers screened, 201 documented relevant information with over 900 extractions for activities addressing violence against women (n =797) and gender inequality (n =110), totalling an estimated A$12.1billion. Rather than a steady investment, funding fluctuated, and jurisdictional differences occurred. Supporting people impacted by violence, raising workforce capacity and developing systems to strengthen the response were supported. Primary prevention, incorporating awareness-raising and promoting gender equality, received fewer resources overall, with funding directed towards education, workplace and sports settings. Conclusions During a critical time of action to reduce violence against women, increased government funding occurred, supporting diverse strategies. However, a lack of clarity and consistency in budget reporting contributed to uncertainty in total funding committed over this timeline. Having a fiscal strategy over the entire action plan will embed long-term funding and improve future planning and monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Research & Practice\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Research & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/PU24027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PU24027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
A critical review of long-term funding for reducing violence against women in Australia.
Objectives and importance of study Adequate funding for comprehensive strategies is crucial to eliminating violence against women. This study examined funding committed during a major policy initiative aimed at reducing violence against women in Australia between 2010 and 2023. Study type A retrospective review of federal, state and territory government budget documents to estimate funding levels and examine the distribution of resources across types of strategies aimed at addressing violence against women in Australia. Methods Review and data extraction of budget estimates and activity descriptions addressing violence against women and gender inequality during the time of Australia's National Plan to Reduce Violence Against Women and their Children . Mixed-method analysis explored trends in funding over time by jurisdiction and strategy type and identified priority actions. Results Of the 508 papers screened, 201 documented relevant information with over 900 extractions for activities addressing violence against women (n =797) and gender inequality (n =110), totalling an estimated A$12.1billion. Rather than a steady investment, funding fluctuated, and jurisdictional differences occurred. Supporting people impacted by violence, raising workforce capacity and developing systems to strengthen the response were supported. Primary prevention, incorporating awareness-raising and promoting gender equality, received fewer resources overall, with funding directed towards education, workplace and sports settings. Conclusions During a critical time of action to reduce violence against women, increased government funding occurred, supporting diverse strategies. However, a lack of clarity and consistency in budget reporting contributed to uncertainty in total funding committed over this timeline. Having a fiscal strategy over the entire action plan will embed long-term funding and improve future planning and monitoring.
期刊介绍:
Public Health Research & Practice is an open-access, quarterly, online journal with a strong focus on the connection between research, policy and practice. It publishes innovative, high-quality papers that inform public health policy and practice, paying particular attention to innovations, data and perspectives from policy and practice. The journal is published by the Sax Institute, a national leader in promoting the use of research evidence in health policy. Formerly known as The NSW Public Health Bulletin, the journal has a long history. It was published by the NSW Ministry of Health for nearly a quarter of a century. Responsibility for its publication transferred to the Sax Institute in 2014, and the journal receives guidance from an expert editorial board.